利马(秘鲁)小学生综合学习的STEM与非STEM教学结果

Fiorela Mirella Tuva Vega, Sonia Morales, Ruth Demetria Ticona Tintaya, Milton Gonzales-Macavilca, Ivan Iraola-Real
{"title":"利马(秘鲁)小学生综合学习的STEM与非STEM教学结果","authors":"Fiorela Mirella Tuva Vega, Sonia Morales, Ruth Demetria Ticona Tintaya, Milton Gonzales-Macavilca, Ivan Iraola-Real","doi":"10.1109/SHIRCON48091.2019.9024744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparative analysis of two private primary schools located in Lima Norte (north of Lima, Peru), in one of them students are educated under the STEM methodology and in the other no. The objective of this comparison is to determine if the STEM favors the development of integral learning skills (critical thinking, communication, collaboration, creativity and research). For this, an investigation of quantitative, exploratory and descriptive approach was carried out. The sample is made up of 52 students; of them, 27 (51.9%) were educated with STEM methodology and 25 (48.1%) were not. The results revealed that students with STEM present high means and significant differences both in critical thinking (mean= 4.78, p= 0.008; <0.05), in communication and collaboration (mean= 4.52, p= 0.001; <0.05), and in creativity and research (mean= 4.93,p= 0.000; <0.05).","PeriodicalId":113450,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Sciences and Humanities International Research Conference (SHIRCON)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results between STEM and non-STEM Teaching for Integral Learning in Primary School Children in Lima (Peru)\",\"authors\":\"Fiorela Mirella Tuva Vega, Sonia Morales, Ruth Demetria Ticona Tintaya, Milton Gonzales-Macavilca, Ivan Iraola-Real\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SHIRCON48091.2019.9024744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a comparative analysis of two private primary schools located in Lima Norte (north of Lima, Peru), in one of them students are educated under the STEM methodology and in the other no. The objective of this comparison is to determine if the STEM favors the development of integral learning skills (critical thinking, communication, collaboration, creativity and research). For this, an investigation of quantitative, exploratory and descriptive approach was carried out. The sample is made up of 52 students; of them, 27 (51.9%) were educated with STEM methodology and 25 (48.1%) were not. The results revealed that students with STEM present high means and significant differences both in critical thinking (mean= 4.78, p= 0.008; <0.05), in communication and collaboration (mean= 4.52, p= 0.001; <0.05), and in creativity and research (mean= 4.93,p= 0.000; <0.05).\",\"PeriodicalId\":113450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE Sciences and Humanities International Research Conference (SHIRCON)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE Sciences and Humanities International Research Conference (SHIRCON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SHIRCON48091.2019.9024744\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Sciences and Humanities International Research Conference (SHIRCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SHIRCON48091.2019.9024744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文对位于利马北部(秘鲁利马北部)的两所私立小学进行了比较分析,其中一所学校的学生采用STEM方法进行教育,另一所学校采用STEM方法进行教育。这种比较的目的是确定STEM是否有利于培养整体学习技能(批判性思维、沟通、协作、创造力和研究)。为此,进行了定量、探索性和描述性的调查。样本由52名学生组成;其中27人(51.9%)接受过STEM方法学教育,25人(48.1%)未接受过STEM方法学教育。结果显示,STEM学生在批判性思维方面表现出高均值和显著差异(均值= 4.78,p= 0.008;<0.05),在沟通和协作方面(平均= 4.52,p= 0.001;<0.05),在创造力和研究方面(平均= 4.93,p= 0.000;< 0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Results between STEM and non-STEM Teaching for Integral Learning in Primary School Children in Lima (Peru)
This paper presents a comparative analysis of two private primary schools located in Lima Norte (north of Lima, Peru), in one of them students are educated under the STEM methodology and in the other no. The objective of this comparison is to determine if the STEM favors the development of integral learning skills (critical thinking, communication, collaboration, creativity and research). For this, an investigation of quantitative, exploratory and descriptive approach was carried out. The sample is made up of 52 students; of them, 27 (51.9%) were educated with STEM methodology and 25 (48.1%) were not. The results revealed that students with STEM present high means and significant differences both in critical thinking (mean= 4.78, p= 0.008; <0.05), in communication and collaboration (mean= 4.52, p= 0.001; <0.05), and in creativity and research (mean= 4.93,p= 0.000; <0.05).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Citizen science approach for spatiotemporal modelling of air pollution quality and traffic in Lima, Peru Latin American universities and digital craft: reaching out to regional development Perception Of The Adolescents On The Integral Sexual Education: A Study Of A Sample Of Lima Peru Physical and psychological violence against pregnant women in a district of Callao Application of Lean manufacturing tools in a footwear company
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1