正义战争理论中的战后正义

L. Yakushev
{"title":"正义战争理论中的战后正义","authors":"L. Yakushev","doi":"10.21146//2074-4870-2019-19-2-128-136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to substantiate the extension of traditional just war theory to the post war period. The author believes that prerequisites for creating the system of principles governing the actions of the participants of a military conflict in the postwar period (the so-called \"jus post bellum\") is embedded in the very foundations of just war theory. This thesis is confirmed by some historical precedents (Augustine, Francisco de Vitoria, Hugo Grotius, Immanuel Kant). However, the systematic research of the subject started only in the second half of the XX-th century. The interest in jus post bellum was renewed due to the increase the devastating effects of modern warfare, the growing recognition of the priority of human rights and the expanding interdependence of the members of the international community. Contemporary ethicists and political philosophers suggested some versions of jus post bellum for the classical interstate wars. The situation is much less clear with jus post bellum for the non-classical military conflicts where non-state participants are involved. Filling this gap is one of the most important tasks of just war theory.","PeriodicalId":360102,"journal":{"name":"Ethical Thought","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jus Post Bellum in Just War Theory\",\"authors\":\"L. Yakushev\",\"doi\":\"10.21146//2074-4870-2019-19-2-128-136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the article is to substantiate the extension of traditional just war theory to the post war period. The author believes that prerequisites for creating the system of principles governing the actions of the participants of a military conflict in the postwar period (the so-called \\\"jus post bellum\\\") is embedded in the very foundations of just war theory. This thesis is confirmed by some historical precedents (Augustine, Francisco de Vitoria, Hugo Grotius, Immanuel Kant). However, the systematic research of the subject started only in the second half of the XX-th century. The interest in jus post bellum was renewed due to the increase the devastating effects of modern warfare, the growing recognition of the priority of human rights and the expanding interdependence of the members of the international community. Contemporary ethicists and political philosophers suggested some versions of jus post bellum for the classical interstate wars. The situation is much less clear with jus post bellum for the non-classical military conflicts where non-state participants are involved. Filling this gap is one of the most important tasks of just war theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethical Thought\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethical Thought\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21146//2074-4870-2019-19-2-128-136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethical Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146//2074-4870-2019-19-2-128-136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是证实传统正义战争理论在战后时期的延伸。作者认为,建立战后军事冲突参与者行为准则体系(所谓“战后正义”)的先决条件根植于正义战争理论的基础之中。这一论点得到了一些历史先例的证实(奥古斯丁、弗朗西斯科·德·维多利亚、雨果·格劳秀斯、伊曼努尔·康德)。然而,对这一学科的系统研究直到20世纪下半叶才开始。由于现代战争的破坏性影响增加,人们日益认识到人权的优先地位以及国际社会成员之间日益扩大的相互依存关系,人们重新对战后法产生了兴趣。当代伦理学家和政治哲学家对经典的国家间战争提出了一些战后正义的说法。在非国家参与者参与的非经典军事冲突中,战争后的情况就不那么清楚了。填补这一空白,是正义战争理论最重要的任务之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Jus Post Bellum in Just War Theory
The purpose of the article is to substantiate the extension of traditional just war theory to the post war period. The author believes that prerequisites for creating the system of principles governing the actions of the participants of a military conflict in the postwar period (the so-called "jus post bellum") is embedded in the very foundations of just war theory. This thesis is confirmed by some historical precedents (Augustine, Francisco de Vitoria, Hugo Grotius, Immanuel Kant). However, the systematic research of the subject started only in the second half of the XX-th century. The interest in jus post bellum was renewed due to the increase the devastating effects of modern warfare, the growing recognition of the priority of human rights and the expanding interdependence of the members of the international community. Contemporary ethicists and political philosophers suggested some versions of jus post bellum for the classical interstate wars. The situation is much less clear with jus post bellum for the non-classical military conflicts where non-state participants are involved. Filling this gap is one of the most important tasks of just war theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Ethical, Moral and Pragmatic Justification of Political Decisions The Idea of Just War in the Western Ethical Tradition (from Antiquity to the Mid-18th Century) Proceedings of a Discussion on the Paper “Moral Philosophy and Ethics”, by Abduslam Guseynov, a Member of Russian Academy of Sciences Aristotle in the Moral Philosophy of the Early Modern Period (Treatise of H. Grotius «On the Law of War and Peace») Jus Post Bellum in Just War Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1