印刷业化学品安全信息质量。

Chung-Jung Tsai, I. Mao, Joey Ting, Chi H. Young, Jhih-Sian Lin, Wei-lun Li
{"title":"印刷业化学品安全信息质量。","authors":"Chung-Jung Tsai, I. Mao, Joey Ting, Chi H. Young, Jhih-Sian Lin, Wei-lun Li","doi":"10.1093/annhyg/mev079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nEmployees in printing industries can be exposed to multiple solvents in their work environment. The objectives of this study were to investigate the critical components of chemical solvents by analyzing the components of the solvents and collecting the Safety data sheets (SDSs), and to evaluate the hazard communication implementation status in printing industries.\n\n\nMETHOD\nAbout 152 printing-related industries were recruited by area-stratified random sampling and included 23 plate-making, 102 printing and 27 printing-assistance companies in Taiwan. We analyzed company questionnaires (n = 152), SDSs (n = 180), and solvents (n = 20) collected from this sample of printing-related companies.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAnalytical results indicated that benzene and ethylbenzene, which were carcinogen and possibly carcinogen, were detectable in the cleaning solvents, and the detection rate were 54.5% (concentrations: <0.011-0.035 wt%) and 63.6% (concentrations: <0.011-6.22 wt%), respectively; however, neither compound was disclosed in the SDS for the solvents. Several other undisclosed components, including methanol, isopropanol and n-butanol, were also identified in the printing inks, fountain solutions and dilution solvents. We noted that, of the companies we surveyed, only 57.2% had a hazard communication program, 61.8% had SDSs on file and 59.9% provided employee safety and health training. We note that hazard communication programs were missing or ineffective in almost half of the 152 printing industries surveyed.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nCurrent safety information of solvents components in printing industries was inadequate, and many hazardous compounds were undisclosed in the SDSs of the solvents or the labels of the containers. The implementation of hazard communications in printing industries was still not enough for protecting the employees' safety and health.","PeriodicalId":342592,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of occupational hygiene","volume":"95 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Chemical Safety Information in Printing Industry.\",\"authors\":\"Chung-Jung Tsai, I. Mao, Joey Ting, Chi H. Young, Jhih-Sian Lin, Wei-lun Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/annhyg/mev079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES\\nEmployees in printing industries can be exposed to multiple solvents in their work environment. The objectives of this study were to investigate the critical components of chemical solvents by analyzing the components of the solvents and collecting the Safety data sheets (SDSs), and to evaluate the hazard communication implementation status in printing industries.\\n\\n\\nMETHOD\\nAbout 152 printing-related industries were recruited by area-stratified random sampling and included 23 plate-making, 102 printing and 27 printing-assistance companies in Taiwan. We analyzed company questionnaires (n = 152), SDSs (n = 180), and solvents (n = 20) collected from this sample of printing-related companies.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nAnalytical results indicated that benzene and ethylbenzene, which were carcinogen and possibly carcinogen, were detectable in the cleaning solvents, and the detection rate were 54.5% (concentrations: <0.011-0.035 wt%) and 63.6% (concentrations: <0.011-6.22 wt%), respectively; however, neither compound was disclosed in the SDS for the solvents. Several other undisclosed components, including methanol, isopropanol and n-butanol, were also identified in the printing inks, fountain solutions and dilution solvents. We noted that, of the companies we surveyed, only 57.2% had a hazard communication program, 61.8% had SDSs on file and 59.9% provided employee safety and health training. We note that hazard communication programs were missing or ineffective in almost half of the 152 printing industries surveyed.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nCurrent safety information of solvents components in printing industries was inadequate, and many hazardous compounds were undisclosed in the SDSs of the solvents or the labels of the containers. The implementation of hazard communications in printing industries was still not enough for protecting the employees' safety and health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Annals of occupational hygiene\",\"volume\":\"95 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Annals of occupational hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mev079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of occupational hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mev079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

目的印刷业的员工在工作环境中可能会接触到多种溶剂。本研究的目的是通过分析溶剂成分和收集安全数据表(sds)来调查化学溶剂的关键成分,并评估印刷行业的危害沟通实施状况。方法采用区域分层随机抽样的方法,选取台湾地区约152家印刷相关行业,其中制版企业23家,印刷企业102家,印刷辅助企业27家。我们分析了从印刷相关公司样本中收集的公司问卷(n = 152)、sds (n = 180)和溶剂(n = 20)。结果清洗溶剂中检出致癌物苯和可能致癌物乙苯,检出率分别为54.5%(浓度<0.011 ~ 0.035 wt%)和63.6%(浓度<0.011 ~ 6.22 wt%);然而,这两种化合物在溶剂的SDS中都没有公开。在印刷油墨、润版液和稀释溶剂中还发现了其他几种未公开的成分,包括甲醇、异丙醇和正丁醇。我们注意到,在我们调查的公司中,只有57.2%的公司有危害沟通计划,61.8%的公司有sds档案,59.9%的公司提供员工安全和健康培训。我们注意到,在接受调查的152个印刷行业中,几乎有一半的行业缺少或无效的危害沟通程序。结论目前印刷行业溶剂组分安全信息不充分,溶剂sds或容器标签中存在许多未公开的有害化合物。在印刷业实施危险通报仍然不足以保护雇员的安全和健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality of Chemical Safety Information in Printing Industry.
OBJECTIVES Employees in printing industries can be exposed to multiple solvents in their work environment. The objectives of this study were to investigate the critical components of chemical solvents by analyzing the components of the solvents and collecting the Safety data sheets (SDSs), and to evaluate the hazard communication implementation status in printing industries. METHOD About 152 printing-related industries were recruited by area-stratified random sampling and included 23 plate-making, 102 printing and 27 printing-assistance companies in Taiwan. We analyzed company questionnaires (n = 152), SDSs (n = 180), and solvents (n = 20) collected from this sample of printing-related companies. RESULTS Analytical results indicated that benzene and ethylbenzene, which were carcinogen and possibly carcinogen, were detectable in the cleaning solvents, and the detection rate were 54.5% (concentrations: <0.011-0.035 wt%) and 63.6% (concentrations: <0.011-6.22 wt%), respectively; however, neither compound was disclosed in the SDS for the solvents. Several other undisclosed components, including methanol, isopropanol and n-butanol, were also identified in the printing inks, fountain solutions and dilution solvents. We noted that, of the companies we surveyed, only 57.2% had a hazard communication program, 61.8% had SDSs on file and 59.9% provided employee safety and health training. We note that hazard communication programs were missing or ineffective in almost half of the 152 printing industries surveyed. CONCLUSIONS Current safety information of solvents components in printing industries was inadequate, and many hazardous compounds were undisclosed in the SDSs of the solvents or the labels of the containers. The implementation of hazard communications in printing industries was still not enough for protecting the employees' safety and health.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Response to Article by Prof. Hans Kromhout, Hygiene Without Numbers. The Validity and Applicability of Using a Generic Exposure Assessment Model for Occupational Exposure to Nano-Objects and Their Aggregates and Agglomerates. Occupational Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Polish Coke Plant Workers. A New Miniature Respirable Sampler for In-mask Sampling: Part 2-Tests Performed Inside the Mask. When Are Risk Analyses on Job Titles Informative?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1