好的官僚主义:马克斯·韦伯与今天的公共行政

W. Drechsler
{"title":"好的官僚主义:马克斯·韦伯与今天的公共行政","authors":"W. Drechsler","doi":"10.1353/max.2020.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Max Weber passed away on 14 June 1920 at the early age of 56, from consequences of the last pandemic – the Spanish Flu (Kaesler 2014: 15-16). During the last 100 years, Weber’s position as one of the world's great economists, sociologists, social science theorists, and public administration scholars has been secure, if with ups and downs. I will in this short tribute focus on public administration, because Weber’s eminence is probably the least contested there – not uncontested, for sure, as eminence must attract criticism. There are, even within the pages of Max Weber Studies, complaints that Weber has to be rediscovered – but these complaints are themselves part of the reason why this is not so, and a fortiori in public administration. Ups and downs yes, but Weber remains central in public administration. At a minimum, we may say that he is the most important public administration thinker of his time, even of modern public administration. One can think with or against Weber in public administration, but by and large, not really without him.","PeriodicalId":103306,"journal":{"name":"Max Weber Studies","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Good Bureaucracy: Max Weber and Public Administration Today\",\"authors\":\"W. Drechsler\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/max.2020.0014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Max Weber passed away on 14 June 1920 at the early age of 56, from consequences of the last pandemic – the Spanish Flu (Kaesler 2014: 15-16). During the last 100 years, Weber’s position as one of the world's great economists, sociologists, social science theorists, and public administration scholars has been secure, if with ups and downs. I will in this short tribute focus on public administration, because Weber’s eminence is probably the least contested there – not uncontested, for sure, as eminence must attract criticism. There are, even within the pages of Max Weber Studies, complaints that Weber has to be rediscovered – but these complaints are themselves part of the reason why this is not so, and a fortiori in public administration. Ups and downs yes, but Weber remains central in public administration. At a minimum, we may say that he is the most important public administration thinker of his time, even of modern public administration. One can think with or against Weber in public administration, but by and large, not really without him.\",\"PeriodicalId\":103306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Max Weber Studies\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Max Weber Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/max.2020.0014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Max Weber Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/max.2020.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

马克斯·韦伯于1920年6月14日去世,年仅56岁,死因是上一次大流行——西班牙流感(Kaesler 2014: 15-16)。在过去的100年里,韦伯作为世界上最伟大的经济学家、社会学家、社会科学理论家和公共行政学者之一的地位一直是稳固的,尽管有起起落落。在这篇简短的颂词中,我将把重点放在公共管理上,因为韦伯的卓越可能是最不受争议的——当然,并非毫无争议,因为卓越必然会招致批评。甚至在《马克斯·韦伯研究》中,也有人抱怨说,韦伯必须被重新发现——但这些抱怨本身就是为什么事实并非如此的部分原因,而且是公共管理领域的一种强化。起起落落是的,但韦伯仍然是公共行政的核心。至少,我们可以说他是他那个时代,甚至是现代公共行政最重要的公共行政思想家。在公共管理方面,人们可以赞同或反对韦伯,但总的来说,不能没有他。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Good Bureaucracy: Max Weber and Public Administration Today
Max Weber passed away on 14 June 1920 at the early age of 56, from consequences of the last pandemic – the Spanish Flu (Kaesler 2014: 15-16). During the last 100 years, Weber’s position as one of the world's great economists, sociologists, social science theorists, and public administration scholars has been secure, if with ups and downs. I will in this short tribute focus on public administration, because Weber’s eminence is probably the least contested there – not uncontested, for sure, as eminence must attract criticism. There are, even within the pages of Max Weber Studies, complaints that Weber has to be rediscovered – but these complaints are themselves part of the reason why this is not so, and a fortiori in public administration. Ups and downs yes, but Weber remains central in public administration. At a minimum, we may say that he is the most important public administration thinker of his time, even of modern public administration. One can think with or against Weber in public administration, but by and large, not really without him.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Narratives of Disenchantment and Secularization: Critiquing Max Weber's Idea of Modernity ed. by Robert A Yelle and Lorenz Trein (review) List of Contributors Otto Neurath's Distorted Reception of Weber's Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism Methodology from the Standpoint of Experience: A Comparison of Max Weber, Heinrich Rickert and John Stuart Mill Planned Introduction to the Abriß der universalen Sozial- und Wirtschaftsgeschichte Mit- und Nachschriften 1919–1920 in the Max Weber Gesamtausgabe (Sections 1-6)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1