渗流带输运模型VLEACH的研究

Y. Rong
{"title":"渗流带输运模型VLEACH的研究","authors":"Y. Rong","doi":"10.1080/10588339991339315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Application of vadose zone transport models has been hampered by lack of model validation. Difficulties to validate vadose zone models using field data not only come from model assumptions that are uncertain to the subsurface transport processes but also from the uncertainties associated with soil contaminants’ release time and quantity, soil sampling, sample transport, and analytical procedures. This article first conducts a test of a popularly used vadose zone transport VLEACH by comparing model results with a set of laboratory soil column infiltration and volatilization study data. The comparison shows a close agreement between the VLEACH model results and the laboratory data. Second, the sorption coefficient Kd calculated in VLEACH is compared with field data. The comparison indicates that VLEACH may overestimate the mass leached from soil to groundwater. The article also discusses the selection of the model simulation timestep, the vertical dimension increment, the Courant criterion, and the lower bo...","PeriodicalId":433778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soil Contamination","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study of Vadose Zone Transport Model VLEACH\",\"authors\":\"Y. Rong\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10588339991339315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Application of vadose zone transport models has been hampered by lack of model validation. Difficulties to validate vadose zone models using field data not only come from model assumptions that are uncertain to the subsurface transport processes but also from the uncertainties associated with soil contaminants’ release time and quantity, soil sampling, sample transport, and analytical procedures. This article first conducts a test of a popularly used vadose zone transport VLEACH by comparing model results with a set of laboratory soil column infiltration and volatilization study data. The comparison shows a close agreement between the VLEACH model results and the laboratory data. Second, the sorption coefficient Kd calculated in VLEACH is compared with field data. The comparison indicates that VLEACH may overestimate the mass leached from soil to groundwater. The article also discusses the selection of the model simulation timestep, the vertical dimension increment, the Courant criterion, and the lower bo...\",\"PeriodicalId\":433778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Soil Contamination\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Soil Contamination\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10588339991339315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soil Contamination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10588339991339315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

气包带输运模型的应用一直受到模型验证不足的阻碍。利用野外数据验证渗透带模型的困难不仅来自模型假设对地下运移过程的不确定性,还来自与土壤污染物释放时间和数量、土壤采样、样品运输和分析程序相关的不确定性。本文首先通过将模型结果与室内一组土壤柱入渗挥发研究数据进行对比,对一种常用的渗透带输运VLEACH进行了测试。对比表明,VLEACH模型的计算结果与实验室数据非常吻合。其次,将VLEACH计算的吸附系数Kd与现场数据进行了比较。对比表明,VLEACH方法可能高估了从土壤到地下水的浸出量。本文还讨论了模型仿真时间步长、垂直维数增量、Courant准则和下限的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Study of Vadose Zone Transport Model VLEACH
Application of vadose zone transport models has been hampered by lack of model validation. Difficulties to validate vadose zone models using field data not only come from model assumptions that are uncertain to the subsurface transport processes but also from the uncertainties associated with soil contaminants’ release time and quantity, soil sampling, sample transport, and analytical procedures. This article first conducts a test of a popularly used vadose zone transport VLEACH by comparing model results with a set of laboratory soil column infiltration and volatilization study data. The comparison shows a close agreement between the VLEACH model results and the laboratory data. Second, the sorption coefficient Kd calculated in VLEACH is compared with field data. The comparison indicates that VLEACH may overestimate the mass leached from soil to groundwater. The article also discusses the selection of the model simulation timestep, the vertical dimension increment, the Courant criterion, and the lower bo...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bioremediation of Soil Contaminated with Explosives at the Naval Weapons Station Yorktown Settlement Prediction for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills Using Power Creep Law Quantification of Compositional Changes of Petroleum Hydrocarbons by GC/FID and GC/MS during a Long-Term Bioremediation Experiment A Method for Assessing Leaching Potential for Petroleum Hydrocarbons Release Sites: Multiphase and Multisubstance Equilibrium Partitioning Monte Carlo Vadose Zone Model for Soil Remedial Criteria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1