两种不同镍钛旋转系统牙体检测的抗断裂性能比较

Aliaa Elgendy
{"title":"两种不同镍钛旋转系统牙体检测的抗断裂性能比较","authors":"Aliaa Elgendy","doi":"10.33425/2639-9490.1107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aimed to compare the fracture resistance exhibited by roots on instrumentation using two endodontic rotary systems: SANI S3 and EdgeEndo X7 rotary file systems. Materials and Methods: Sixty recently extracted human mandibular premolars comprising single root canals were selected in this study. All specimens were decoronated and mounted perpendicularly in self-cure acrylic resin blocks exposing 6 mm of the roots out of the acrylic resin blocks. The specimens were divided into two experimental groups, according to NiTi rotary systems used and one control group (n = 20). After instrumentation, the specimens of both experimental groups were then filled using master Gutta-percha cones size 35 (0.04 taper) and obturation was done using continuous wave compaction technique. The specimens were kept at 37 °C and 100% humidity for 2 weeks to allow complete setting of the sealer. Root fracture resistance was assessed using a universal testing machine (Instron) and the amount of load necessary for root fracture was recorded in Newtons (N). Statistics: Data were collected, tabulated and statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA test and Tukey’s posthoc test. Results: Group C (control) exhibited the highest mean fracture force (357.13 ± 20.61) while group A (SANI S3) showed the lowest mean fracture force (192.60 ± 22.73). One-way ANOVA test showed statistically significant differences between tested groups. Regarding inter-group comparisons using Tukey’s test, there was a significant statistical difference between groups (A and B) and between groups (A and C). Furthermore, there was a statistically significant difference between groups (B and C). (P?0.05) Conclusion: 1-Root canal instrumentation with NiTi rotary files possessed a negative impact on roots and higher risks of root fractures compared to intact unprepared roots. 2-Design of NiTi files with improved cutting efficiency could diminish the risk of crack formation in root canal dentinal walls.","PeriodicalId":263229,"journal":{"name":"Oral Health and Dental science","volume":"324 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Assessment of The Fracture Resistance of Teeth Instrumented by Two Different Nickel Titanium Rotary Systems\",\"authors\":\"Aliaa Elgendy\",\"doi\":\"10.33425/2639-9490.1107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: This study aimed to compare the fracture resistance exhibited by roots on instrumentation using two endodontic rotary systems: SANI S3 and EdgeEndo X7 rotary file systems. Materials and Methods: Sixty recently extracted human mandibular premolars comprising single root canals were selected in this study. All specimens were decoronated and mounted perpendicularly in self-cure acrylic resin blocks exposing 6 mm of the roots out of the acrylic resin blocks. The specimens were divided into two experimental groups, according to NiTi rotary systems used and one control group (n = 20). After instrumentation, the specimens of both experimental groups were then filled using master Gutta-percha cones size 35 (0.04 taper) and obturation was done using continuous wave compaction technique. The specimens were kept at 37 °C and 100% humidity for 2 weeks to allow complete setting of the sealer. Root fracture resistance was assessed using a universal testing machine (Instron) and the amount of load necessary for root fracture was recorded in Newtons (N). Statistics: Data were collected, tabulated and statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA test and Tukey’s posthoc test. Results: Group C (control) exhibited the highest mean fracture force (357.13 ± 20.61) while group A (SANI S3) showed the lowest mean fracture force (192.60 ± 22.73). One-way ANOVA test showed statistically significant differences between tested groups. Regarding inter-group comparisons using Tukey’s test, there was a significant statistical difference between groups (A and B) and between groups (A and C). Furthermore, there was a statistically significant difference between groups (B and C). (P?0.05) Conclusion: 1-Root canal instrumentation with NiTi rotary files possessed a negative impact on roots and higher risks of root fractures compared to intact unprepared roots. 2-Design of NiTi files with improved cutting efficiency could diminish the risk of crack formation in root canal dentinal walls.\",\"PeriodicalId\":263229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral Health and Dental science\",\"volume\":\"324 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral Health and Dental science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-9490.1107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Health and Dental science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-9490.1107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较两种根管旋转系统(SANI S3和EdgeEndo X7旋转文件系统)对根管内固定的抗骨折性。材料与方法:选取60颗新近拔除的含单根管的人下颌前磨牙为研究对象。将所有标本装饰并垂直安装在自固化丙烯酸树脂块中,露出丙烯酸树脂块外6mm的根部。根据使用的NiTi旋转系统将标本分为两个实验组和一个对照组(n = 20)。仪器测量完成后,两组实验标本均采用35(0.04锥度)古达-柏胶主锥体填充,并采用连续波压实技术进行封闭。标本在37°C和100%湿度下保存2周,以使密封剂完全定型。使用万能试验机(Instron)评估根断裂阻力,并以牛顿(N)记录根断裂所需的载荷。统计学:收集数据,制表并使用单因素方差分析和Tukey 's posthoc检验进行统计分析。结果:C组(对照组)平均断裂力最高(357.13±20.61),A组(SANI S3)平均断裂力最低(192.60±22.73)。单因素方差分析显示各组间差异有统计学意义。采用Tukey检验进行组间比较,a组与B组之间、a组与C组之间比较,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:1根管内固定NiTi旋转锉对根管有负面影响,根管骨折风险高于未预备根管。2 .设计切削效率更高的镍钛锉,可降低根管牙本质管壁产生裂纹的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Assessment of The Fracture Resistance of Teeth Instrumented by Two Different Nickel Titanium Rotary Systems
Aim: This study aimed to compare the fracture resistance exhibited by roots on instrumentation using two endodontic rotary systems: SANI S3 and EdgeEndo X7 rotary file systems. Materials and Methods: Sixty recently extracted human mandibular premolars comprising single root canals were selected in this study. All specimens were decoronated and mounted perpendicularly in self-cure acrylic resin blocks exposing 6 mm of the roots out of the acrylic resin blocks. The specimens were divided into two experimental groups, according to NiTi rotary systems used and one control group (n = 20). After instrumentation, the specimens of both experimental groups were then filled using master Gutta-percha cones size 35 (0.04 taper) and obturation was done using continuous wave compaction technique. The specimens were kept at 37 °C and 100% humidity for 2 weeks to allow complete setting of the sealer. Root fracture resistance was assessed using a universal testing machine (Instron) and the amount of load necessary for root fracture was recorded in Newtons (N). Statistics: Data were collected, tabulated and statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA test and Tukey’s posthoc test. Results: Group C (control) exhibited the highest mean fracture force (357.13 ± 20.61) while group A (SANI S3) showed the lowest mean fracture force (192.60 ± 22.73). One-way ANOVA test showed statistically significant differences between tested groups. Regarding inter-group comparisons using Tukey’s test, there was a significant statistical difference between groups (A and B) and between groups (A and C). Furthermore, there was a statistically significant difference between groups (B and C). (P?0.05) Conclusion: 1-Root canal instrumentation with NiTi rotary files possessed a negative impact on roots and higher risks of root fractures compared to intact unprepared roots. 2-Design of NiTi files with improved cutting efficiency could diminish the risk of crack formation in root canal dentinal walls.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Management of Edentulous Patients with Maxillary Substance Loss: A Case Report Correction of Anterior Crossbite, Using Removable Appliances in Mixed Dentition: 5-Year Follow-Up Bjork-Jarabak Analysis in Different Anteroposterior Skeletal Relationship: A Comparative Study Cephalometric Determination of the Vertical Dimension of Occlusion: Clinical Study A Comparative Study of Two Resonance Frequency Analysis Instruments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1