V. V. Trefilova, N. A. Shnayder, M. Novitsky, O. A. Ovdienko, Z. A. Nurgaliev
{"title":"患者报告的结果在成人背痛中的应用:第1部分","authors":"V. V. Trefilova, N. A. Shnayder, M. Novitsky, O. A. Ovdienko, Z. A. Nurgaliev","doi":"10.52667/2712-9179-2022-2-2-34-46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the research is generalization of information about the most common foreign and domestic scales and questionnaires used in acute and chronic back pain (BP). The analysis of Russian-language and foreign literature was carried out with a search depth of 5 years (2016–2021) in the following databases: e-Library, PubMed, Oxford Press, Clinical Keys, Springer, Elsevier, Google Scholar. For the diagnosis of acute and chronic BP and the assessment of the characteristics of its course in dynamics, both a standardized study may be use: collection of complaints, anamnesis, objective examination, assessment of neurological status, as well as valid scales and questionnaires. For the timely diagnosis and monitoring of the development of BP in patients, a wide range of scales and questionnaires were proposed, which were conventionally ranked into 4 groups: scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with BP; scales for assessing the characteristics of pain in BP; scales for assessing the outcomes of the disease in BP; scales for assessing disability in BP. The first part of the thematic review presents an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with BP. These perspective scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with BP are popular in the world neurological practice. It is necessary to adapt to the use in domestic clinical practice the Stratford Functional Back Pain Scale, the Index of Disability Associated with Pain, The Patient Assessment for Low Back Pain–Impacts.","PeriodicalId":414041,"journal":{"name":"Personalized Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Back Pain in Adults: Part 1\",\"authors\":\"V. V. Trefilova, N. A. Shnayder, M. Novitsky, O. A. Ovdienko, Z. A. Nurgaliev\",\"doi\":\"10.52667/2712-9179-2022-2-2-34-46\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the research is generalization of information about the most common foreign and domestic scales and questionnaires used in acute and chronic back pain (BP). The analysis of Russian-language and foreign literature was carried out with a search depth of 5 years (2016–2021) in the following databases: e-Library, PubMed, Oxford Press, Clinical Keys, Springer, Elsevier, Google Scholar. For the diagnosis of acute and chronic BP and the assessment of the characteristics of its course in dynamics, both a standardized study may be use: collection of complaints, anamnesis, objective examination, assessment of neurological status, as well as valid scales and questionnaires. For the timely diagnosis and monitoring of the development of BP in patients, a wide range of scales and questionnaires were proposed, which were conventionally ranked into 4 groups: scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with BP; scales for assessing the characteristics of pain in BP; scales for assessing the outcomes of the disease in BP; scales for assessing disability in BP. The first part of the thematic review presents an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with BP. These perspective scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with BP are popular in the world neurological practice. It is necessary to adapt to the use in domestic clinical practice the Stratford Functional Back Pain Scale, the Index of Disability Associated with Pain, The Patient Assessment for Low Back Pain–Impacts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personalized Psychiatry and Neurology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personalized Psychiatry and Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52667/2712-9179-2022-2-2-34-46\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized Psychiatry and Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52667/2712-9179-2022-2-2-34-46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本研究的目的是对国内外最常用的用于急性和慢性背痛(BP)的量表和问卷的信息进行归纳。在以下数据库中进行了俄语和外国文献的分析,检索深度为5年(2016-2021):e-Library, PubMed, Oxford Press, Clinical Keys, Springer, Elsevier, Google Scholar。对于急慢性BP的诊断和动态过程特征的评估,可以使用标准化的研究:收集主诉、记忆、客观检查、神经状态评估以及有效的量表和问卷。为了及时诊断和监测患者BP的发展,提出了广泛的量表和问卷,按常规分为4组:用于评估BP患者生活质量的量表;评估BP疼痛特征的量表;用于评估BP患者预后的量表;评估BP残疾的量表。主题综述的第一部分分析了用于评估BP患者生活质量的量表的优点和缺点。这些评估BP患者生活质量的透视量表在世界神经学实践中很流行。有必要适应国内临床实践中使用的斯特拉特福德功能性背痛量表、疼痛相关残疾指数、腰痛影响患者评估。
Application of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Back Pain in Adults: Part 1
The aim of the research is generalization of information about the most common foreign and domestic scales and questionnaires used in acute and chronic back pain (BP). The analysis of Russian-language and foreign literature was carried out with a search depth of 5 years (2016–2021) in the following databases: e-Library, PubMed, Oxford Press, Clinical Keys, Springer, Elsevier, Google Scholar. For the diagnosis of acute and chronic BP and the assessment of the characteristics of its course in dynamics, both a standardized study may be use: collection of complaints, anamnesis, objective examination, assessment of neurological status, as well as valid scales and questionnaires. For the timely diagnosis and monitoring of the development of BP in patients, a wide range of scales and questionnaires were proposed, which were conventionally ranked into 4 groups: scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with BP; scales for assessing the characteristics of pain in BP; scales for assessing the outcomes of the disease in BP; scales for assessing disability in BP. The first part of the thematic review presents an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with BP. These perspective scales for assessing the quality of life of patients with BP are popular in the world neurological practice. It is necessary to adapt to the use in domestic clinical practice the Stratford Functional Back Pain Scale, the Index of Disability Associated with Pain, The Patient Assessment for Low Back Pain–Impacts.