迷你钢板与螺钉对斜螺旋型掌骨骨折的治疗

M. Saleh, A. Toreih
{"title":"迷你钢板与螺钉对斜螺旋型掌骨骨折的治疗","authors":"M. Saleh, A. Toreih","doi":"10.4103/eoj.eoj_125_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Fractures involving the tubular bones of the hand are the most frequent of all skeletal injuries. The choice of treatment depends on a variety of clinical and radiological factors. The goal of treatment is restoration or preservation of the hand function. Objectives To compare the results of mini plate plus screw versus screw only in oblique and spiral metacarpal fractures. Patients and methods This is a randomized clinical trial that included 40 patients with oblique and spiral metacarpal fractures who divided into two groups according to management: either fixation by mini plate and mini screws (20 patients) or fixation by mini screws only (20 patients). Quick-DASH and total active motion (TAM) scoring systems were used to evaluate all patients on 4th, 12th, and 24th weeks postoperative. Results The mean value of TAM score in the mini plate group was significantly higher than screws only group at 4th week postoperative (P=0.007) while it was nonsignificantly higher at 12th and 24th week postoperative. Also, the mean value of DASH score in the mini plate group was significantly lower than screws only group at 4th week postoperative (P=0.0001) while it was nonsignificantly lower at 12th and 24th week postoperative. The total number of complicated patients in the mini plate group was 2 patients (10%) while it was 5 patients (25%) in the screw only group with significant difference between both groups (P=0.0001). Conclusion Although mini plate and screw group showed early mobilization of the affected hand and has significant Quick-DASH and TAM scores at 4th week postoperative, both groups revealed the same functional outcomes at the end of follow-up.","PeriodicalId":171084,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of oblique and spiral metacarpal fractures with mini plate and screw versus screws only\",\"authors\":\"M. Saleh, A. Toreih\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/eoj.eoj_125_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Fractures involving the tubular bones of the hand are the most frequent of all skeletal injuries. The choice of treatment depends on a variety of clinical and radiological factors. The goal of treatment is restoration or preservation of the hand function. Objectives To compare the results of mini plate plus screw versus screw only in oblique and spiral metacarpal fractures. Patients and methods This is a randomized clinical trial that included 40 patients with oblique and spiral metacarpal fractures who divided into two groups according to management: either fixation by mini plate and mini screws (20 patients) or fixation by mini screws only (20 patients). Quick-DASH and total active motion (TAM) scoring systems were used to evaluate all patients on 4th, 12th, and 24th weeks postoperative. Results The mean value of TAM score in the mini plate group was significantly higher than screws only group at 4th week postoperative (P=0.007) while it was nonsignificantly higher at 12th and 24th week postoperative. Also, the mean value of DASH score in the mini plate group was significantly lower than screws only group at 4th week postoperative (P=0.0001) while it was nonsignificantly lower at 12th and 24th week postoperative. The total number of complicated patients in the mini plate group was 2 patients (10%) while it was 5 patients (25%) in the screw only group with significant difference between both groups (P=0.0001). Conclusion Although mini plate and screw group showed early mobilization of the affected hand and has significant Quick-DASH and TAM scores at 4th week postoperative, both groups revealed the same functional outcomes at the end of follow-up.\",\"PeriodicalId\":171084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/eoj.eoj_125_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/eoj.eoj_125_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手管骨骨折是所有骨骼损伤中最常见的。治疗的选择取决于多种临床和放射学因素。治疗的目的是恢复或保留手的功能。目的比较微型钢板加螺钉与单纯螺钉治疗倾斜型和螺旋型掌骨骨折的疗效。患者和方法:这是一项随机临床试验,纳入了40例倾斜和螺旋型手掌骨折患者,根据治疗方法分为两组:采用微型钢板和微型螺钉固定(20例)或仅采用微型螺钉固定(20例)。术后第4周、第12周和第24周采用Quick-DASH和总主动运动(TAM)评分系统对所有患者进行评估。结果微创钢板组术后第4周TAM评分平均值显著高于单纯螺钉组(P=0.007),术后第12周和24周TAM评分平均值无显著差异。微创钢板组术后第4周DASH评分均值显著低于单纯螺钉组(P=0.0001),而术后第12周和第24周DASH评分均值差异无统计学意义。微型钢板组并发症总人数为2例(10%),单纯螺钉组并发症总人数为5例(25%),两组差异有统计学意义(P=0.0001)。结论小型钢板螺钉组术后4周患手活动较早,Quick-DASH和TAM评分显著,但随访结束时两组功能结果相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Management of oblique and spiral metacarpal fractures with mini plate and screw versus screws only
Background Fractures involving the tubular bones of the hand are the most frequent of all skeletal injuries. The choice of treatment depends on a variety of clinical and radiological factors. The goal of treatment is restoration or preservation of the hand function. Objectives To compare the results of mini plate plus screw versus screw only in oblique and spiral metacarpal fractures. Patients and methods This is a randomized clinical trial that included 40 patients with oblique and spiral metacarpal fractures who divided into two groups according to management: either fixation by mini plate and mini screws (20 patients) or fixation by mini screws only (20 patients). Quick-DASH and total active motion (TAM) scoring systems were used to evaluate all patients on 4th, 12th, and 24th weeks postoperative. Results The mean value of TAM score in the mini plate group was significantly higher than screws only group at 4th week postoperative (P=0.007) while it was nonsignificantly higher at 12th and 24th week postoperative. Also, the mean value of DASH score in the mini plate group was significantly lower than screws only group at 4th week postoperative (P=0.0001) while it was nonsignificantly lower at 12th and 24th week postoperative. The total number of complicated patients in the mini plate group was 2 patients (10%) while it was 5 patients (25%) in the screw only group with significant difference between both groups (P=0.0001). Conclusion Although mini plate and screw group showed early mobilization of the affected hand and has significant Quick-DASH and TAM scores at 4th week postoperative, both groups revealed the same functional outcomes at the end of follow-up.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Are olecranon osteotomies preferred to triceps-elevating approaches in intraarticular distal humerus fractures? A literature review Comparative study of posterior lumbar interbody fusion by strut laminar autograft versus cage in degenerative lumbar spine diseases Distal fibula locked plate versus nonlocked plate for treatment of Danis Weber type B fracture comparative prospective study Assessment of lateral malleolus weber C fractures’ outcomes in patients undergoing syndesmosis-only fixation versus syndesmosis and fibular fixation Anterior odontoid lag screw fixation in type II odontoid fractures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1