使用不同数据来源的财富计量和结构差异:以英国为例

Zoé Oldfield, Eva Sierminska
{"title":"使用不同数据来源的财富计量和结构差异:以英国为例","authors":"Zoé Oldfield, Eva Sierminska","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1008240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we identify methodological differences and similarities in the measurement of wealth using survey data constructed for different purposes in the U.K. and separately for England. The focus of the paper is on two prominent surveys in the U.K.: the English Longitudinal Survey of Ageing (ELSA) and the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS). We find conceptual differences in the measurement of financial assets and debt. At the same time, striking similarities exist in the measurement of non-financial assets. For the most part, many differences arise in the tails of the distributions of wealth. Comparable definitions of overall wealth in the surveys lead us to find a 10% and 3% difference in mean and conditional median of total net worth, respectively. Reassuring is the fact that inequality results carried out with the two surveys support one another and quantile regression shows that the distribution of total net worth across demographic groups is similar in the two surveys.","PeriodicalId":398400,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: National Income & Product Accounts (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in the Measurement and Structure of Wealth Using Alternative Data Sources: The Case of the UK\",\"authors\":\"Zoé Oldfield, Eva Sierminska\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1008240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we identify methodological differences and similarities in the measurement of wealth using survey data constructed for different purposes in the U.K. and separately for England. The focus of the paper is on two prominent surveys in the U.K.: the English Longitudinal Survey of Ageing (ELSA) and the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS). We find conceptual differences in the measurement of financial assets and debt. At the same time, striking similarities exist in the measurement of non-financial assets. For the most part, many differences arise in the tails of the distributions of wealth. Comparable definitions of overall wealth in the surveys lead us to find a 10% and 3% difference in mean and conditional median of total net worth, respectively. Reassuring is the fact that inequality results carried out with the two surveys support one another and quantile regression shows that the distribution of total net worth across demographic groups is similar in the two surveys.\",\"PeriodicalId\":398400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: National Income & Product Accounts (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: National Income & Product Accounts (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1008240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: National Income & Product Accounts (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1008240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本文中,我们使用在英国和英国分别为不同目的构建的调查数据来确定财富测量方法的差异和相似之处。本文的重点是在英国的两个突出的调查:英国老龄化纵向调查(ELSA)和英国家庭面板调查(BHPS)。我们发现在金融资产和债务的计量上存在概念上的差异。与此同时,非金融资产的计量也存在惊人的相似性。在大多数情况下,许多差异出现在财富分配的尾部。调查中对总体财富的可比定义让我们发现,总净资产的平均值和条件中位数分别有10%和3%的差异。令人欣慰的是,这两项调查得出的不平等结果相互支持,分位数回归显示,在这两项调查中,总净资产在不同人口群体中的分布是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences in the Measurement and Structure of Wealth Using Alternative Data Sources: The Case of the UK
In this paper, we identify methodological differences and similarities in the measurement of wealth using survey data constructed for different purposes in the U.K. and separately for England. The focus of the paper is on two prominent surveys in the U.K.: the English Longitudinal Survey of Ageing (ELSA) and the British Household Panel Survey (BHPS). We find conceptual differences in the measurement of financial assets and debt. At the same time, striking similarities exist in the measurement of non-financial assets. For the most part, many differences arise in the tails of the distributions of wealth. Comparable definitions of overall wealth in the surveys lead us to find a 10% and 3% difference in mean and conditional median of total net worth, respectively. Reassuring is the fact that inequality results carried out with the two surveys support one another and quantile regression shows that the distribution of total net worth across demographic groups is similar in the two surveys.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Firms’ Response to Macroeconomic Estimation Errors Expanded GDP for Welfare Measurement in the 21st Century An Analysis of Sustainability of Digital Economy in Select Member Countries of Asian Development Bank Why Comparative Advantage is a Problematic Guide to Practical Policy Transport Infrastructure, Growth and Persistence: The Rise and Demise of the Sui Canal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1