系统回顾:最高水平的证据

Ortho-tips Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.35366/102220
José María Jiménez Ávila, Andrea Melissa Briseño González, Martín Octavio García Salazar, Fernanda Ramírez Amado, Natasha Alexandra Medina Vincent, Alexis Vargas del Toro, Marlene Vanessa Salcido Reyna
{"title":"系统回顾:最高水平的证据","authors":"José María Jiménez Ávila, Andrea Melissa Briseño González, Martín Octavio García Salazar, Fernanda Ramírez Amado, Natasha Alexandra Medina Vincent, Alexis Vargas del Toro, Marlene Vanessa Salcido Reyna","doi":"10.35366/102220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The systematic review is a publication of secondary source, that is, it summarizes the information of primary articles, however it is necessary that the elaboration process is described in a transparent and understandable way, from the collection of articles, the criteria of the articles and the analysis of the results, to make it systematic. We can make a review of a topic without it being systematic, the difference is always the degree of evidence, the meta-analysis is the statistical analysis of two or more studies, these articles do not come from a systematic review, nor do all systematic reviews have meta-analysis. Systematic review is a scientific investigation that attempts to answer a research question. The elaboration process can be divided into simple stages, but it is important to show what was done in the study as well as the search dates. 1. Define the research question, 2. Establish eligibility criteria, 3. Establish the search strategy, 4. Analyze the bias and the results of the chosen studies, and 5. Interpretation and presentation of the results.","PeriodicalId":272585,"journal":{"name":"Ortho-tips","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisión sistemática: el más alto nivel de evidencia\",\"authors\":\"José María Jiménez Ávila, Andrea Melissa Briseño González, Martín Octavio García Salazar, Fernanda Ramírez Amado, Natasha Alexandra Medina Vincent, Alexis Vargas del Toro, Marlene Vanessa Salcido Reyna\",\"doi\":\"10.35366/102220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The systematic review is a publication of secondary source, that is, it summarizes the information of primary articles, however it is necessary that the elaboration process is described in a transparent and understandable way, from the collection of articles, the criteria of the articles and the analysis of the results, to make it systematic. We can make a review of a topic without it being systematic, the difference is always the degree of evidence, the meta-analysis is the statistical analysis of two or more studies, these articles do not come from a systematic review, nor do all systematic reviews have meta-analysis. Systematic review is a scientific investigation that attempts to answer a research question. The elaboration process can be divided into simple stages, but it is important to show what was done in the study as well as the search dates. 1. Define the research question, 2. Establish eligibility criteria, 3. Establish the search strategy, 4. Analyze the bias and the results of the chosen studies, and 5. Interpretation and presentation of the results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ortho-tips\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ortho-tips\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35366/102220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ortho-tips","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35366/102220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

系统综述是一种二次来源的出版物,也就是说,它总结了主要文章的信息,但是必须以透明和可理解的方式描述阐述过程,从文章的收集,文章的标准和结果的分析,使其系统化。我们可以对一个主题进行综述,而不是系统性的,区别总是证据的程度,荟萃分析是对两个或两个以上研究的统计分析,这些文章不是来自系统综述,也不是所有的系统综述都有荟萃分析。系统评价是一种试图回答研究问题的科学调查。细化过程可以分为几个简单的阶段,但重要的是要显示在研究中做了什么以及搜索日期。1. 定义研究问题,2。建立资格标准;4.建立搜索策略。分析所选研究的偏倚和结果;结果的解释和呈现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Revisión sistemática: el más alto nivel de evidencia
The systematic review is a publication of secondary source, that is, it summarizes the information of primary articles, however it is necessary that the elaboration process is described in a transparent and understandable way, from the collection of articles, the criteria of the articles and the analysis of the results, to make it systematic. We can make a review of a topic without it being systematic, the difference is always the degree of evidence, the meta-analysis is the statistical analysis of two or more studies, these articles do not come from a systematic review, nor do all systematic reviews have meta-analysis. Systematic review is a scientific investigation that attempts to answer a research question. The elaboration process can be divided into simple stages, but it is important to show what was done in the study as well as the search dates. 1. Define the research question, 2. Establish eligibility criteria, 3. Establish the search strategy, 4. Analyze the bias and the results of the chosen studies, and 5. Interpretation and presentation of the results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Luxación erecta de hombro con luxación posterior de codo ipsilateral simultánea sin lesión ósea asociada: reporte de caso Uso de fluoroscopia intraoperatoria para la colocación segura de los tornillos transpediculares en C2 en proyección anteroposterior Tuberculosis de calcáneo en lactante. Reporte de un caso Resultados funcionales del manejo quirúrgico y conservador de pacientes con fractura de calcáneo Eficacia de la vancomicina, reflejo en costos para la atención del tratamiento de infección en cirugía de columna
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1