抽样方案对Cpk影响的分析分析

X.Q. Liu
{"title":"抽样方案对Cpk影响的分析分析","authors":"X.Q. Liu","doi":"10.1109/IEMC.1995.524589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use and abuse of process capability indices (PCIs) have become topics of considerable controversy in the last few years. A simulation shows that the difference in Cpk's estimated by three approaches, which are widely used in manufacturing industry, is at least 0.5. In this paper, the authors study analytically the differences in Cpk's calculated by these three different approaches. A few analytical relationships among the Cpk's are derived in this paper and are illustrated with a case study.","PeriodicalId":231067,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings for Operating Research and the Management Sciences","volume":"1955 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytical analysis of effect of sampling plan on Cpk\",\"authors\":\"X.Q. Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEMC.1995.524589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use and abuse of process capability indices (PCIs) have become topics of considerable controversy in the last few years. A simulation shows that the difference in Cpk's estimated by three approaches, which are widely used in manufacturing industry, is at least 0.5. In this paper, the authors study analytically the differences in Cpk's calculated by these three different approaches. A few analytical relationships among the Cpk's are derived in this paper and are illustrated with a case study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings for Operating Research and the Management Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1955 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings for Operating Research and the Management Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.1995.524589\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings for Operating Research and the Management Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.1995.524589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去几年中,过程能力指数(pci)的使用和滥用已经成为相当有争议的话题。仿真结果表明,在制造业中广泛使用的三种方法估计的Cpk值的差异至少为0.5。在本文中,作者分析了这三种不同方法计算的Cpk的差异。本文推导了Cpk之间的一些分析关系,并通过实例加以说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analytical analysis of effect of sampling plan on Cpk
The use and abuse of process capability indices (PCIs) have become topics of considerable controversy in the last few years. A simulation shows that the difference in Cpk's estimated by three approaches, which are widely used in manufacturing industry, is at least 0.5. In this paper, the authors study analytically the differences in Cpk's calculated by these three different approaches. A few analytical relationships among the Cpk's are derived in this paper and are illustrated with a case study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quality issues in database reverse engineering: an overview Managing R&D projects: a systemic approach Application of hierarchy multistage-multiobjective approach to network design: case of express road Productivity increase in process and device simulation throughput for integrated circuit manufacturing companies Energy conservation through building management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1