{"title":"响尾蛇山，怀俄明州，辩论:对模型的回顾和批判","authors":"D. Stone","doi":"10.31582/rmag.mg.21.2.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Structural interpretation of Rattlesnake Mountain, located on the west flank of the Big Horn Basin, Wyoming, at Buffalo Bill Reservoir, has been the subject of lively debate since at least 1930. Six structural \"models\" of this feature published previously, representing both the verticalists' \"drape fold\" and the horizontal compressionists' thrust-fold interpretations, are shown and dis cussed. It is concluded that the \"drape fold\" model for Rattlesnake Mountain or for any other intrabasin fault-fold structure in the Rocky Mountain fore/and is fundamentally untenable, and that the developmental sequence proposed by Blackstone in 1940 is essentially correct as indicated by data from deep wells and modern seismic profiling. However, a number of questions still need answers.","PeriodicalId":101513,"journal":{"name":"Mountain Geologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Rattlesnake Mountain, Wyoming, Debate: A Review and Critique of Models\",\"authors\":\"D. Stone\",\"doi\":\"10.31582/rmag.mg.21.2.37\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Structural interpretation of Rattlesnake Mountain, located on the west flank of the Big Horn Basin, Wyoming, at Buffalo Bill Reservoir, has been the subject of lively debate since at least 1930. Six structural \\\"models\\\" of this feature published previously, representing both the verticalists' \\\"drape fold\\\" and the horizontal compressionists' thrust-fold interpretations, are shown and dis cussed. It is concluded that the \\\"drape fold\\\" model for Rattlesnake Mountain or for any other intrabasin fault-fold structure in the Rocky Mountain fore/and is fundamentally untenable, and that the developmental sequence proposed by Blackstone in 1940 is essentially correct as indicated by data from deep wells and modern seismic profiling. However, a number of questions still need answers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mountain Geologist\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1984-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mountain Geologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31582/rmag.mg.21.2.37\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mountain Geologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31582/rmag.mg.21.2.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
响尾蛇山(Rattlesnake Mountain)位于怀俄明州大角盆地(Big Horn Basin)西侧的布法罗比尔水库(Buffalo Bill Reservoir)，其构造解释至少自1930年以来一直是激烈辩论的主题。本文展示并讨论了先前发表的这一特征的六个构造“模型”，分别代表了垂直论者的“褶皱褶皱”和水平挤压论者的逆冲褶皱解释。认为响尾蛇山或落基山脉前、后盆地内断褶构造的“褶皱”模式根本站不住脚，1940年Blackstone提出的发育层序从深井资料和现代地震剖面资料来看基本正确。然而，仍有许多问题需要解答。
The Rattlesnake Mountain, Wyoming, Debate: A Review and Critique of Models
Structural interpretation of Rattlesnake Mountain, located on the west flank of the Big Horn Basin, Wyoming, at Buffalo Bill Reservoir, has been the subject of lively debate since at least 1930. Six structural "models" of this feature published previously, representing both the verticalists' "drape fold" and the horizontal compressionists' thrust-fold interpretations, are shown and dis cussed. It is concluded that the "drape fold" model for Rattlesnake Mountain or for any other intrabasin fault-fold structure in the Rocky Mountain fore/and is fundamentally untenable, and that the developmental sequence proposed by Blackstone in 1940 is essentially correct as indicated by data from deep wells and modern seismic profiling. However, a number of questions still need answers.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
