超越隐性与显性:知识的四个维度

R. Casselman, D. Samson
{"title":"超越隐性与显性:知识的四个维度","authors":"R. Casselman, D. Samson","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.2005.446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge is a complex concept, yet the dominant view of knowledge in the management literature is a dichotomy between tacit and explicit. Even the knowledge management literature tends to view knowledge on a limited number of dimensions, whether this is in discussions of knowledge as a commodity or the process of knowing. A review of knowledge from first principles shows that knowledge has different degrees of validity, is highly heterogeneous and has complicated temporal and social aspects. A model of knowledge based on these aspects is presented. Comparing the four dimensions of knowledge with knowledge as a process opens up a more holistic view of knowledge management and helps articulate some of the key differences within streams of research in the field. This holistic perspective is also compatible with Polanyi's original complex conception of tacit knowledge, which drew heavily on Gestalt theory, a theory that examines the perception of \"wholes\". The dual perspectives of a multi-dimensional conception of knowledge as a commodity and a holistic perspective on knowledge management expands the avenues of potential research and improves our ability to put knowledge in action within organizations.","PeriodicalId":355838,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moving Beyond Tacit and Explicit: Four Dimensions of Knowledge\",\"authors\":\"R. Casselman, D. Samson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HICSS.2005.446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Knowledge is a complex concept, yet the dominant view of knowledge in the management literature is a dichotomy between tacit and explicit. Even the knowledge management literature tends to view knowledge on a limited number of dimensions, whether this is in discussions of knowledge as a commodity or the process of knowing. A review of knowledge from first principles shows that knowledge has different degrees of validity, is highly heterogeneous and has complicated temporal and social aspects. A model of knowledge based on these aspects is presented. Comparing the four dimensions of knowledge with knowledge as a process opens up a more holistic view of knowledge management and helps articulate some of the key differences within streams of research in the field. This holistic perspective is also compatible with Polanyi's original complex conception of tacit knowledge, which drew heavily on Gestalt theory, a theory that examines the perception of \\\"wholes\\\". The dual perspectives of a multi-dimensional conception of knowledge as a commodity and a holistic perspective on knowledge management expands the avenues of potential research and improves our ability to put knowledge in action within organizations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2005.446\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2005.446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

知识是一个复杂的概念,然而,在管理文献中,知识的主要观点是隐性和显性的二分法。即使是知识管理文献也倾向于在有限的维度上看待知识,无论是在讨论知识作为商品还是知识的过程时。对第一性原理知识的回顾表明,知识具有不同程度的有效性,高度异质性,具有复杂的时间和社会方面。提出了一个基于这些方面的知识模型。将知识的四个维度与作为一个过程的知识进行比较,可以打开一个更全面的知识管理视图,并有助于阐明该领域研究流中的一些关键差异。这种整体视角也与波兰尼最初的默会知识的复杂概念相一致,后者大量借鉴了格式塔理论,一种研究“整体”感知的理论。知识作为商品的多维概念和知识管理的整体视角的双重视角扩展了潜在研究的途径,并提高了我们在组织内将知识付诸行动的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Moving Beyond Tacit and Explicit: Four Dimensions of Knowledge
Knowledge is a complex concept, yet the dominant view of knowledge in the management literature is a dichotomy between tacit and explicit. Even the knowledge management literature tends to view knowledge on a limited number of dimensions, whether this is in discussions of knowledge as a commodity or the process of knowing. A review of knowledge from first principles shows that knowledge has different degrees of validity, is highly heterogeneous and has complicated temporal and social aspects. A model of knowledge based on these aspects is presented. Comparing the four dimensions of knowledge with knowledge as a process opens up a more holistic view of knowledge management and helps articulate some of the key differences within streams of research in the field. This holistic perspective is also compatible with Polanyi's original complex conception of tacit knowledge, which drew heavily on Gestalt theory, a theory that examines the perception of "wholes". The dual perspectives of a multi-dimensional conception of knowledge as a commodity and a holistic perspective on knowledge management expands the avenues of potential research and improves our ability to put knowledge in action within organizations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity: Is There More Than Meets The Eye? A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Technology Support on Teams with Differing Diversity A Framework for Evaluating Strategic Location-Based Applications in Businesses A Comparison of Relational and Trust Training Techniques for Virtual Team Communication: How Much Training is Enough? Prototyping the Emergence of Collaborative Knowledge Towards an Approach for Managing the Development Portfolio in Small Product-Oriented Software Companies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1