使用SPARQL和Relational将关系数据引入语义web。猫头鹰

C. Laborda, Stefan Conrad
{"title":"使用SPARQL和Relational将关系数据引入语义web。猫头鹰","authors":"C. Laborda, Stefan Conrad","doi":"10.1109/ICDEW.2006.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite all the efforts to build up a Semantic Web, where each machine can understand and interpret the data it processes, information is usually still stored in ordinary relational databases. Semantic Web applications needing access to such semantically unexploited data, have to create their own manual relational database to Semantic Web mappings. In this paper we analyze, whether the combination of Relational.OWL as a Semantic Web representation of relational databases and a semantic query language like SPARQL could be an alternative. The benefits of such an approach are clear, since it enables Semantic Web applications to access and query data actually stored in relational databases using their own built-in functionality.","PeriodicalId":331953,"journal":{"name":"22nd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW'06)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"71","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bringing Relational Data into the SemanticWeb using SPARQL and Relational.OWL\",\"authors\":\"C. Laborda, Stefan Conrad\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDEW.2006.37\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite all the efforts to build up a Semantic Web, where each machine can understand and interpret the data it processes, information is usually still stored in ordinary relational databases. Semantic Web applications needing access to such semantically unexploited data, have to create their own manual relational database to Semantic Web mappings. In this paper we analyze, whether the combination of Relational.OWL as a Semantic Web representation of relational databases and a semantic query language like SPARQL could be an alternative. The benefits of such an approach are clear, since it enables Semantic Web applications to access and query data actually stored in relational databases using their own built-in functionality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"22nd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW'06)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"71\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"22nd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW'06)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDEW.2006.37\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"22nd International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops (ICDEW'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDEW.2006.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 71

摘要

尽管人们努力构建语义网,使每台机器都能理解和解释它所处理的数据,但信息通常仍然存储在普通的关系数据库中。语义Web应用程序需要访问这些语义上未被利用的数据,必须创建自己的手动关系数据库来映射语义Web。在本文中我们分析,是否结合关系。OWL作为关系数据库的语义Web表示和语义查询语言(如SPARQL)可能是另一种选择。这种方法的好处是显而易见的,因为它使语义Web应用程序能够使用自己的内置功能访问和查询实际存储在关系数据库中的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bringing Relational Data into the SemanticWeb using SPARQL and Relational.OWL
Despite all the efforts to build up a Semantic Web, where each machine can understand and interpret the data it processes, information is usually still stored in ordinary relational databases. Semantic Web applications needing access to such semantically unexploited data, have to create their own manual relational database to Semantic Web mappings. In this paper we analyze, whether the combination of Relational.OWL as a Semantic Web representation of relational databases and a semantic query language like SPARQL could be an alternative. The benefits of such an approach are clear, since it enables Semantic Web applications to access and query data actually stored in relational databases using their own built-in functionality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Web Interface Navigation Design: Which Style of Navigation-Link Menus Do Users Prefer? Replication Based on Objects Load under a Content Distribution Network A Stochastic Approach for Trust Management A Multiple-Perspective, Interactive Approach for Web Information Extraction and Exploration Seaweed: Distributed Scalable Ad Hoc Querying
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1