医学辅助生殖和同性伴侣:意大利议会坚持自己的立场

Francesca Maoli
{"title":"医学辅助生殖和同性伴侣:意大利议会坚持自己的立场","authors":"Francesca Maoli","doi":"10.1163/27725650-02020010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis contribution examines a recent ruling of the Italian Corte di Cassazione, concerning the recognition of parentage resulting from medically assisted procreation (“map”) techniques performed abroad by female same-sex couples. In cases where the birth of the child occurs in Italy, the Italian birth certificate usually contains the indication of the woman who gave birth, but does not mention the intentional mother, even when the latter has a biological relationship with the child. The Corte di Cassazione has confirmed its consolidated position in denying the amendment of the birth certificate, on the basis of a rigorous interpretation of the limits provided by the Law No. 40/2004. The Italian law prohibits the access of map techniques by same-sex couples, because their condition cannot be equated to a pathological infertility. The ruling under review overlooks the human rights implications possibly deriving from the recognition of intentional motherhood: in rejecting the allegations concerning the infringment of the fundamental rights enshrined by the European Convention on Human Rights (“echr”), the court has stated that the gaps in protection that may result from the application of Italian law may only be solved through an intervention of the lawmaker.","PeriodicalId":275877,"journal":{"name":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medically Assisted Procreation and Same-Sex Couples: The Italian Corte di Cassazione Stands its Ground\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Maoli\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/27725650-02020010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis contribution examines a recent ruling of the Italian Corte di Cassazione, concerning the recognition of parentage resulting from medically assisted procreation (“map”) techniques performed abroad by female same-sex couples. In cases where the birth of the child occurs in Italy, the Italian birth certificate usually contains the indication of the woman who gave birth, but does not mention the intentional mother, even when the latter has a biological relationship with the child. The Corte di Cassazione has confirmed its consolidated position in denying the amendment of the birth certificate, on the basis of a rigorous interpretation of the limits provided by the Law No. 40/2004. The Italian law prohibits the access of map techniques by same-sex couples, because their condition cannot be equated to a pathological infertility. The ruling under review overlooks the human rights implications possibly deriving from the recognition of intentional motherhood: in rejecting the allegations concerning the infringment of the fundamental rights enshrined by the European Convention on Human Rights (“echr”), the court has stated that the gaps in protection that may result from the application of Italian law may only be solved through an intervention of the lawmaker.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-02020010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-02020010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章审查了意大利卡萨齐奥尼法院最近的一项裁决,该裁决涉及承认女性同性伴侣在国外采用医学辅助生殖技术(" map ")所产生的亲子关系。在孩子在意大利出生的情况下,意大利出生证明通常包含分娩妇女的指示,但不提及有意为之的母亲,即使后者与孩子有生理关系。卡萨齐奥尼法院根据对第40/2004号法律规定的限制的严格解释,确认了其拒绝修改出生证明的坚定立场。意大利法律禁止同性伴侣使用地图技术,因为他们的情况不能等同于病理性不孕。正在审查的裁决忽略了承认故意为人母可能产生的人权问题:法院在驳回关于侵犯《欧洲人权公约》所载基本权利的指控时指出,只有通过立法者的干预才能解决因适用意大利法律而可能造成的保护方面的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medically Assisted Procreation and Same-Sex Couples: The Italian Corte di Cassazione Stands its Ground
This contribution examines a recent ruling of the Italian Corte di Cassazione, concerning the recognition of parentage resulting from medically assisted procreation (“map”) techniques performed abroad by female same-sex couples. In cases where the birth of the child occurs in Italy, the Italian birth certificate usually contains the indication of the woman who gave birth, but does not mention the intentional mother, even when the latter has a biological relationship with the child. The Corte di Cassazione has confirmed its consolidated position in denying the amendment of the birth certificate, on the basis of a rigorous interpretation of the limits provided by the Law No. 40/2004. The Italian law prohibits the access of map techniques by same-sex couples, because their condition cannot be equated to a pathological infertility. The ruling under review overlooks the human rights implications possibly deriving from the recognition of intentional motherhood: in rejecting the allegations concerning the infringment of the fundamental rights enshrined by the European Convention on Human Rights (“echr”), the court has stated that the gaps in protection that may result from the application of Italian law may only be solved through an intervention of the lawmaker.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Victim Status of Individuals in Climate Change Litigation before the ECtHR State Immunity from Civil Jurisdiction in Transboundary Environmental Litigations The Deterrent Effect of Financial Sanctions Pursuant to Article 260(2) tfeu in the Context of Violations of Environmental Obligations Authorisations to Emit Greenhouse Gases – A Conflict-of-Laws Perspective Upholding Maritime Migrants’ Rights at the Borders of Europe – J.A. and Others v. Italy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1