[对悬臂桥的重新审视-一项截面研究]。

E Paulisch, M Hartmann, C Thierfelder, K P Lange
{"title":"[对悬臂桥的重新审视-一项截面研究]。","authors":"E Paulisch,&nbsp;M Hartmann,&nbsp;C Thierfelder,&nbsp;K P Lange","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the present study reexaminations of 28 cantilever bridges and 26 conventional bridges were carried out. The aim was to evaluate the periodontal conditions and to give recommendations for use. Parameters were PI, GI, tooth mobility, pocket depth, gingival recession and BOP. Deducing from the results, which were statistical analysed, we recommend the cantilever bridges by right using. Special attention should be directed to antagonistical dentition.</p>","PeriodicalId":77521,"journal":{"name":"Deutsche Stomatologie (Berlin, Germany : 1990)","volume":"41 12","pages":"475-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Reexamination of cantilever bridges-a cross-section study].\",\"authors\":\"E Paulisch,&nbsp;M Hartmann,&nbsp;C Thierfelder,&nbsp;K P Lange\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the present study reexaminations of 28 cantilever bridges and 26 conventional bridges were carried out. The aim was to evaluate the periodontal conditions and to give recommendations for use. Parameters were PI, GI, tooth mobility, pocket depth, gingival recession and BOP. Deducing from the results, which were statistical analysed, we recommend the cantilever bridges by right using. Special attention should be directed to antagonistical dentition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deutsche Stomatologie (Berlin, Germany : 1990)\",\"volume\":\"41 12\",\"pages\":\"475-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deutsche Stomatologie (Berlin, Germany : 1990)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsche Stomatologie (Berlin, Germany : 1990)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对28座悬臂桥和26座普通桥进行了复核。目的是评估牙周状况并给出使用建议。参数包括PI、GI、牙活动度、牙袋深度、牙龈退行和BOP。通过对结果的统计分析,提出了正确使用悬臂桥的建议。应特别注意拮抗牙列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Reexamination of cantilever bridges-a cross-section study].

In the present study reexaminations of 28 cantilever bridges and 26 conventional bridges were carried out. The aim was to evaluate the periodontal conditions and to give recommendations for use. Parameters were PI, GI, tooth mobility, pocket depth, gingival recession and BOP. Deducing from the results, which were statistical analysed, we recommend the cantilever bridges by right using. Special attention should be directed to antagonistical dentition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Operative correction of dysgnathism as preprosthetic management]. [The effect of diamond grinding instrument of different grit on dental hard tissue]. [Standardization of the keratinization-index by filter imprints]. [Influence of calcium hydroxide under filling cements]. [Effectiveness of dental prevention programme for Swiss youth].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1