优化民事案件准备审理的法律规制

E. Potapenko
{"title":"优化民事案件准备审理的法律规制","authors":"E. Potapenko","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-6-16-20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article proves the need to prepare a case for trial as an obligatory stage in the civil process. In present times there is an ineffective implementation of the norms regulating the preparation of a case for trial, norms are ignored during legal proceedings in specific civil cases. One of the factors for this problem is a lack of clarity and consistent legal regulation. Many procedural norms, related to the implementation of preparatory procedures, are set out in the framework of other institutions (proof, filing a claim). Within the law norms on preparation constitute underdeveloped complexes that represent a large degree of discretion to the court; the institution of preparation is not structured. The author proposes both a normative adjustment of the rules for preparing a case and the improvement of this institution through the law-interpretation activity of the judicial authorities.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of the Legal Regulation of Preparation of a Civil Case for Hearing\",\"authors\":\"E. Potapenko\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-6-16-20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article proves the need to prepare a case for trial as an obligatory stage in the civil process. In present times there is an ineffective implementation of the norms regulating the preparation of a case for trial, norms are ignored during legal proceedings in specific civil cases. One of the factors for this problem is a lack of clarity and consistent legal regulation. Many procedural norms, related to the implementation of preparatory procedures, are set out in the framework of other institutions (proof, filing a claim). Within the law norms on preparation constitute underdeveloped complexes that represent a large degree of discretion to the court; the institution of preparation is not structured. The author proposes both a normative adjustment of the rules for preparing a case and the improvement of this institution through the law-interpretation activity of the judicial authorities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-6-16-20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-6-16-20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文论证了准备案件作为民事诉讼程序的一个必要阶段的必要性。目前,规范案件准备的规范没有得到有效的执行,规范在具体民事案件的法律程序中被忽视。造成这一问题的因素之一是缺乏明确性和一致的法律规定。与执行筹备程序有关的许多程序规范是在其他机构的框架内制定的(证明、提出索赔)。在法律范围内,关于准备的规范构成了欠发达的复合体,这在很大程度上代表了法院的自由裁量权;准备的制度是没有结构的。笔者提出既要对案件准备规则进行规范调整,又要通过司法机关的法律解释活动来完善这一制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimization of the Legal Regulation of Preparation of a Civil Case for Hearing
The article proves the need to prepare a case for trial as an obligatory stage in the civil process. In present times there is an ineffective implementation of the norms regulating the preparation of a case for trial, norms are ignored during legal proceedings in specific civil cases. One of the factors for this problem is a lack of clarity and consistent legal regulation. Many procedural norms, related to the implementation of preparatory procedures, are set out in the framework of other institutions (proof, filing a claim). Within the law norms on preparation constitute underdeveloped complexes that represent a large degree of discretion to the court; the institution of preparation is not structured. The author proposes both a normative adjustment of the rules for preparing a case and the improvement of this institution through the law-interpretation activity of the judicial authorities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abuse of Law in the Area of Insolvency (Bankruptcy) On the Need for the Unification of Provisions of the Institution of Parties to a Case in Procedural Branches of Russian Law Aims of the Civil Procedure in Russia and France: Common Features and Differences Problems of the Counter Claim Institution in an Arbitral Procedure Collective litigation in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1