人类世的概念为民主改革敲响了警钟

Jörg Tremmel
{"title":"人类世的概念为民主改革敲响了警钟","authors":"Jörg Tremmel","doi":"10.4324/9781351174121-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human activity has reshaped all parts of the Earth system. For this reason, a vast majority of geologists at the 35 International Geological Congress in Cape Town (September 2016) spoke out in favor of changing the classification of geological epochs and of declaring a new world age – the Anthropocene. This chapter points at implications that the proclamation of the Anthropocene should have for the currently relevant concept of democracy. In particular, it is argued that the transition into a new phase of geology also necessitates a further advancement of our form of government. Democracy, as it has been conceived of and practiced until now, has to a large extent ignored the problem of ‘presentism’. This chapter suggests an extension of the 300-years-old separation of powers between the legislative, executive and judicial branch. It is argued that in order to make our political system more future-oriented, there is a need for a new (fourth) branch which ensures that the interests of future generations be taken into account within today's decision-making process. Newly-established embodiments of the proposed future branch, such as offices for future generations (OFGs), could have the right to introduce legislation, integrating the competences of this new institution with those of parliament. The chapter concludes with a discussion about the legitimacy of the proposed change of the institutional architecture of democracies. Note: An abridged version of this text (without photos) will be published in: The Anthropocene Debate and Political Science. Edited by T. Hickmann / L. Partzsch / P. Pattberg / S. Weiland. Routledge Environmental Research Series. London: Routledge. Forthcoming Oct 2018.","PeriodicalId":428156,"journal":{"name":"The Anthropocene Debate and Political Science","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Anthropocene concept as a wake-up call for reforming democracy\",\"authors\":\"Jörg Tremmel\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781351174121-13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Human activity has reshaped all parts of the Earth system. For this reason, a vast majority of geologists at the 35 International Geological Congress in Cape Town (September 2016) spoke out in favor of changing the classification of geological epochs and of declaring a new world age – the Anthropocene. This chapter points at implications that the proclamation of the Anthropocene should have for the currently relevant concept of democracy. In particular, it is argued that the transition into a new phase of geology also necessitates a further advancement of our form of government. Democracy, as it has been conceived of and practiced until now, has to a large extent ignored the problem of ‘presentism’. This chapter suggests an extension of the 300-years-old separation of powers between the legislative, executive and judicial branch. It is argued that in order to make our political system more future-oriented, there is a need for a new (fourth) branch which ensures that the interests of future generations be taken into account within today's decision-making process. Newly-established embodiments of the proposed future branch, such as offices for future generations (OFGs), could have the right to introduce legislation, integrating the competences of this new institution with those of parliament. The chapter concludes with a discussion about the legitimacy of the proposed change of the institutional architecture of democracies. Note: An abridged version of this text (without photos) will be published in: The Anthropocene Debate and Political Science. Edited by T. Hickmann / L. Partzsch / P. Pattberg / S. Weiland. Routledge Environmental Research Series. London: Routledge. Forthcoming Oct 2018.\",\"PeriodicalId\":428156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Anthropocene Debate and Political Science\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Anthropocene Debate and Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351174121-13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Anthropocene Debate and Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351174121-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

人类活动重塑了地球系统的各个部分。因此,在开普敦(2016年9月)举行的第35届国际地质大会上,绝大多数地质学家都赞成改变地质时代的分类,并宣布一个新的世界时代——人类世。本章指出人类世的宣告对当前相关的民主概念应具有的影响。特别是,有人认为,过渡到一个新的地质阶段,也需要进一步推进我们的政府形式。迄今为止,人们对民主的构想和实践,在很大程度上忽略了“现在主义”的问题。这一章提出了延续了300年的立法、行政和司法三权分立的建议。有人认为,为了使我们的政治制度更加面向未来,需要一个新的(第四)部门,以确保在今天的决策过程中考虑到后代的利益。新成立的未来分支机构的具体体现,如未来世代办公室(ofg),可以有权提出立法,将这个新机构的权限与议会的权限相结合。本章最后讨论了民主国家制度架构变革的合法性。注:本文的删节版(不含照片)将发表在《人类世辩论与政治学》上。编辑:T.希克曼/ L.帕特奇/ P.帕特伯格/ S.韦兰。劳特利奇环境研究系列。伦敦:劳特利奇。即将于2018年10月发布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Anthropocene concept as a wake-up call for reforming democracy
Human activity has reshaped all parts of the Earth system. For this reason, a vast majority of geologists at the 35 International Geological Congress in Cape Town (September 2016) spoke out in favor of changing the classification of geological epochs and of declaring a new world age – the Anthropocene. This chapter points at implications that the proclamation of the Anthropocene should have for the currently relevant concept of democracy. In particular, it is argued that the transition into a new phase of geology also necessitates a further advancement of our form of government. Democracy, as it has been conceived of and practiced until now, has to a large extent ignored the problem of ‘presentism’. This chapter suggests an extension of the 300-years-old separation of powers between the legislative, executive and judicial branch. It is argued that in order to make our political system more future-oriented, there is a need for a new (fourth) branch which ensures that the interests of future generations be taken into account within today's decision-making process. Newly-established embodiments of the proposed future branch, such as offices for future generations (OFGs), could have the right to introduce legislation, integrating the competences of this new institution with those of parliament. The chapter concludes with a discussion about the legitimacy of the proposed change of the institutional architecture of democracies. Note: An abridged version of this text (without photos) will be published in: The Anthropocene Debate and Political Science. Edited by T. Hickmann / L. Partzsch / P. Pattberg / S. Weiland. Routledge Environmental Research Series. London: Routledge. Forthcoming Oct 2018.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The nuclear legacy in the Anthropocene Security studies and the discourse on the Anthropocene Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes in the Anthropocene Worlds apart? Disentangling descriptions of and responses to the Anthropocene
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1