2016-2021年在奥洛穆茨大学医院耳鼻喉科和头颈外科进行二次语音假体植入的经验

Petra Beláková, Martin Brož, R. Salzman
{"title":"2016-2021年在奥洛穆茨大学医院耳鼻喉科和头颈外科进行二次语音假体植入的经验","authors":"Petra Beláková, Martin Brož, R. Salzman","doi":"10.48095/ccorl202315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Introduction: Total laryngectomy is one of the treatment options for patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. As a result of this procedure, patients lose their capacity to create natural voice. It is associated with a psychological and social stigma. Currently, implantation of a voice prosthesis is the most modern and preferred option for voice restoration. Voice prostheses are either implanted primarily during total laryngectomy or secondarily after the surgery. At our workplace, we started the secondary implantation of voice prostheses in May 2016. Methodology: The retrospective study aims to evaluate the average interval of voice prosthesis replacements, the frequency, and reasons for replacements in patients with a secondarily implanted voice prosthesis at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery at the Olomouc University Hospital from May 2016 to June 2021. Results: We performed a total of 94 exchanges in the group of 17 patients. The average lifespan of a voice prosthesis in our study is 127 days. The most frequent indication for prosthesis replacement was leakage in 52% of all cases. Conclusion: The lifespan of prostheses in our group is longer than the one reported in the literature. Leakage is the most common indication for prosthesis replacement. Key words voice prosthesis – total laryngectomy – laryngeal cancer","PeriodicalId":423943,"journal":{"name":"Otorinolaryngologie a foniatrie","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experience with secondary voice prostheses implantations at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery at the Olomouc University Hospital in 2016–2021\",\"authors\":\"Petra Beláková, Martin Brož, R. Salzman\",\"doi\":\"10.48095/ccorl202315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Introduction: Total laryngectomy is one of the treatment options for patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. As a result of this procedure, patients lose their capacity to create natural voice. It is associated with a psychological and social stigma. Currently, implantation of a voice prosthesis is the most modern and preferred option for voice restoration. Voice prostheses are either implanted primarily during total laryngectomy or secondarily after the surgery. At our workplace, we started the secondary implantation of voice prostheses in May 2016. Methodology: The retrospective study aims to evaluate the average interval of voice prosthesis replacements, the frequency, and reasons for replacements in patients with a secondarily implanted voice prosthesis at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery at the Olomouc University Hospital from May 2016 to June 2021. Results: We performed a total of 94 exchanges in the group of 17 patients. The average lifespan of a voice prosthesis in our study is 127 days. The most frequent indication for prosthesis replacement was leakage in 52% of all cases. Conclusion: The lifespan of prostheses in our group is longer than the one reported in the literature. Leakage is the most common indication for prosthesis replacement. Key words voice prosthesis – total laryngectomy – laryngeal cancer\",\"PeriodicalId\":423943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otorinolaryngologie a foniatrie\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otorinolaryngologie a foniatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48095/ccorl202315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otorinolaryngologie a foniatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/ccorl202315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要简介:全喉切除术是晚期喉癌患者的治疗选择之一。手术的结果是,病人失去了创造自然声音的能力。它与心理和社会耻辱有关。目前,人工植入术是最现代和首选的语音修复方法。在全喉切除术期间或手术后,首先植入语音假体。在我们的工作场所,我们于2016年5月开始了二次植入术。方法:回顾性研究旨在评估2016年5月至2021年6月在奥洛穆茨大学医院耳鼻喉头颈外科进行二次植入术的假体患者的平均置换间隔、频率和置换原因。结果:我们共对17例患者进行了94次交换。在我们的研究中,语音假肢的平均寿命是127天。假体置换最常见的指征是渗漏,占所有病例的52%。结论:本组假体的使用寿命比文献报道的要长。渗漏是假体置换术最常见的指征。关键词假声全喉切除术喉癌
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experience with secondary voice prostheses implantations at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery at the Olomouc University Hospital in 2016–2021
Summary Introduction: Total laryngectomy is one of the treatment options for patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. As a result of this procedure, patients lose their capacity to create natural voice. It is associated with a psychological and social stigma. Currently, implantation of a voice prosthesis is the most modern and preferred option for voice restoration. Voice prostheses are either implanted primarily during total laryngectomy or secondarily after the surgery. At our workplace, we started the secondary implantation of voice prostheses in May 2016. Methodology: The retrospective study aims to evaluate the average interval of voice prosthesis replacements, the frequency, and reasons for replacements in patients with a secondarily implanted voice prosthesis at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery at the Olomouc University Hospital from May 2016 to June 2021. Results: We performed a total of 94 exchanges in the group of 17 patients. The average lifespan of a voice prosthesis in our study is 127 days. The most frequent indication for prosthesis replacement was leakage in 52% of all cases. Conclusion: The lifespan of prostheses in our group is longer than the one reported in the literature. Leakage is the most common indication for prosthesis replacement. Key words voice prosthesis – total laryngectomy – laryngeal cancer
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nontuberculous mycobacterial infections in children Are our investigation methods sensitive enough to hearing damage caused by noise? Intraoperative use of enhanced contact endoscopy for evaluation of laryngeal mucosal lesions, validation of ELS classification First experience with the use of a silicone stent in the treatment of posterior glottic stenosis – a case report PFAPA syndrome in children, our experience with surgical treatment – review article with a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1