司法审查:管辖权问题和适当论坛

David Welsh
{"title":"司法审查:管辖权问题和适当论坛","authors":"David Welsh","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2022.2135336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2. This article considers the various factors that inform the forum within which proceedings for judicial review can or ought to be brought. It primarily considers matters of jurisdiction between the courts of England & Wales on the one hand and the courts of Scotland on the other. This article is not concerned with proceedings for judicial review that are heard in the Upper Tribunal and nor is it concerned with the provisions of CPR r 7.1A and 7.1B in relation to claims against Welsh public bodies having to be issued and heard in Wales.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judicial Review: Questions of Jurisdiction and Appropriate Forum\",\"authors\":\"David Welsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2022.2135336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"2. This article considers the various factors that inform the forum within which proceedings for judicial review can or ought to be brought. It primarily considers matters of jurisdiction between the courts of England & Wales on the one hand and the courts of Scotland on the other. This article is not concerned with proceedings for judicial review that are heard in the Upper Tribunal and nor is it concerned with the provisions of CPR r 7.1A and 7.1B in relation to claims against Welsh public bodies having to be issued and heard in Wales.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2135336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2135336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2. 本文考虑了司法审查程序可以或应该在哪个法院提起的各种因素。它主要考虑英格兰和威尔士法院与苏格兰法院之间的管辖权问题。本条不涉及在高级法庭审理的司法审查程序,也不涉及《公民权利法》第7.1A和7.1B条关于必须在威尔士提出和审理对威尔士公共机构的索赔的规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Judicial Review: Questions of Jurisdiction and Appropriate Forum
2. This article considers the various factors that inform the forum within which proceedings for judicial review can or ought to be brought. It primarily considers matters of jurisdiction between the courts of England & Wales on the one hand and the courts of Scotland on the other. This article is not concerned with proceedings for judicial review that are heard in the Upper Tribunal and nor is it concerned with the provisions of CPR r 7.1A and 7.1B in relation to claims against Welsh public bodies having to be issued and heard in Wales.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Article 2 and Standards of Proof in Inquests: Unintelligible, Unclear, and Unpredictable? Of Codes and Common Law: The Approach to Apparent Bias in Local Government Committees Competing ‘Clear and Unambiguous’ Constructions: Darwall v Dartmoor National Park Authority [2023] EWCA Civ 927 and the Interpretation of Private Acts of Parliament The Curious Case of Boris’ Bishop: Did the First Catholic Prime Minister Fall Foul of s 18 of the Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829? Information Law and Automated Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1