道德困境中的道德虚伪

Lin Zhumei, Zhu Liqi
{"title":"道德困境中的道德虚伪","authors":"Lin Zhumei, Zhu Liqi","doi":"10.1109/ICIST.2014.6920331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Moral hypocrisy is a phenomenon in which individuals evaluating other people's moral transgressions differ from their evaluations of the same transgressions enacted by themselves. The present study examined whether there is a moral hypocrisy when participants take different roles in moral dilemma. We found that although participants' decisions were no different when they taking different roles in moral dilemmas, the participants in the role of a protagonist took more time to make a decision. These results demonstrated that there may be an implicit moral hypocrisy in moral dilemmas and supported the view that it is the volitionally-guided justifications that results i n hypocrisy.","PeriodicalId":306383,"journal":{"name":"2014 4th IEEE International Conference on Information Science and Technology","volume":"155 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral hypocrisy in moral dilemma\",\"authors\":\"Lin Zhumei, Zhu Liqi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIST.2014.6920331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Moral hypocrisy is a phenomenon in which individuals evaluating other people's moral transgressions differ from their evaluations of the same transgressions enacted by themselves. The present study examined whether there is a moral hypocrisy when participants take different roles in moral dilemma. We found that although participants' decisions were no different when they taking different roles in moral dilemmas, the participants in the role of a protagonist took more time to make a decision. These results demonstrated that there may be an implicit moral hypocrisy in moral dilemmas and supported the view that it is the volitionally-guided justifications that results i n hypocrisy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 4th IEEE International Conference on Information Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"155 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 4th IEEE International Conference on Information Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIST.2014.6920331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 4th IEEE International Conference on Information Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIST.2014.6920331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

道德伪善是个体对他人道德越轨行为的评价与对自身道德越轨行为的评价不同的一种现象。本研究考察了当参与者在道德困境中扮演不同角色时是否存在道德伪善。我们发现,尽管在道德困境中扮演不同角色的参与者的决定没有什么不同,但扮演主角的参与者需要更多的时间来做出决定。这些结果表明,在道德困境中可能存在一种隐含的道德伪善,并支持了这一观点,即是意志引导的辩护导致了伪善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Moral hypocrisy in moral dilemma
Moral hypocrisy is a phenomenon in which individuals evaluating other people's moral transgressions differ from their evaluations of the same transgressions enacted by themselves. The present study examined whether there is a moral hypocrisy when participants take different roles in moral dilemma. We found that although participants' decisions were no different when they taking different roles in moral dilemmas, the participants in the role of a protagonist took more time to make a decision. These results demonstrated that there may be an implicit moral hypocrisy in moral dilemmas and supported the view that it is the volitionally-guided justifications that results i n hypocrisy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combined selective mapping and extended hamming codes for PAPR reduction in OFDM systems Outage analysis of two-way AF relaying systems with imperfect CSI and multiple interferers over Nakagami-m fading channels An empirical study of filter-based feature selection algorithms using noisy training data Using DTW to measure trajectory distance in grid space Parameter optimization for hyperspectral image compression algorithm of maximum error controllable
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1