巴西模块化联盟组织策略与知识共享关系研究

I. A. Rodriguez, Jorge Muniz, T. Munyon
{"title":"巴西模块化联盟组织策略与知识共享关系研究","authors":"I. A. Rodriguez, Jorge Muniz, T. Munyon","doi":"10.4018/ijkm.2021100104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed to explore the relationship between employees' perceptions of organizational politics (POPS) and their predisposition to involve in knowledge sharing (KS) behaviors at individuals and workgroups level in the Brazilian automotive Modular Consortium. The sample included 144 shop floor employees of Modular Consortium (six connected companies in assembly lines). The POPS-KS relationship was analyzed using different referents, seeking to understand how individuals and groups respond to the presence of organizational politics, and POPS and KS were tested in a Brazilian context, shedding new light on potential cultural influences impacting this relationship. The results evidenced that positive interpersonal communication can contribute to KS, and in turn, KS can counteract the negative impacts of POPS. There was a positive relationship between POPS-KS, indicating that POPS may have functional effects in facilitating KS of individuals and workgroups. Key findings and implications for future research were discussed.","PeriodicalId":196147,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Knowl. Manag.","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Relationship Between Organizational Politic and Knowledge Sharing in Brazilian Modular Consortium\",\"authors\":\"I. A. Rodriguez, Jorge Muniz, T. Munyon\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/ijkm.2021100104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aimed to explore the relationship between employees' perceptions of organizational politics (POPS) and their predisposition to involve in knowledge sharing (KS) behaviors at individuals and workgroups level in the Brazilian automotive Modular Consortium. The sample included 144 shop floor employees of Modular Consortium (six connected companies in assembly lines). The POPS-KS relationship was analyzed using different referents, seeking to understand how individuals and groups respond to the presence of organizational politics, and POPS and KS were tested in a Brazilian context, shedding new light on potential cultural influences impacting this relationship. The results evidenced that positive interpersonal communication can contribute to KS, and in turn, KS can counteract the negative impacts of POPS. There was a positive relationship between POPS-KS, indicating that POPS may have functional effects in facilitating KS of individuals and workgroups. Key findings and implications for future research were discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Knowl. Manag.\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Knowl. Manag.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijkm.2021100104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Knowl. Manag.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijkm.2021100104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究旨在探讨巴西汽车模块化联盟员工对组织政治的感知与他们在个人和工作组层面参与知识共享行为的倾向之间的关系。样本包括模块化联盟(Modular Consortium)的144名车间员工(6家相互关联的装配线公司)。使用不同的参考物分析POPS-KS关系,试图了解个人和群体如何应对组织政治的存在,并在巴西背景下对POPS和KS进行了测试,为影响这种关系的潜在文化影响提供了新的视角。研究结果表明,积极的人际交往可以促进持久性有机污染物的存在,而持久性有机污染物的存在又可以抵消持久性有机污染物的负面影响。POPS-KS之间存在正相关关系,表明POPS在促进个人和工作组的KS方面可能具有功能效应。讨论了主要发现和对未来研究的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the Relationship Between Organizational Politic and Knowledge Sharing in Brazilian Modular Consortium
This research aimed to explore the relationship between employees' perceptions of organizational politics (POPS) and their predisposition to involve in knowledge sharing (KS) behaviors at individuals and workgroups level in the Brazilian automotive Modular Consortium. The sample included 144 shop floor employees of Modular Consortium (six connected companies in assembly lines). The POPS-KS relationship was analyzed using different referents, seeking to understand how individuals and groups respond to the presence of organizational politics, and POPS and KS were tested in a Brazilian context, shedding new light on potential cultural influences impacting this relationship. The results evidenced that positive interpersonal communication can contribute to KS, and in turn, KS can counteract the negative impacts of POPS. There was a positive relationship between POPS-KS, indicating that POPS may have functional effects in facilitating KS of individuals and workgroups. Key findings and implications for future research were discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unrealistic Optimism Regarding Artificial Intelligence Opportunities in Human Resource Management Impact of Inbound Open Innovation on Chinese Advanced Manufacturing Enterprise Performance Corporate Social Responsibility Knowledge Transfer in Interfirm Networks Knowledge Retention Challenges in Information Systems Development Teams: A Revelatory Story From Developers in New Zealand Communication Strategies of Entrepreneurial Organizations in Mobile Apps Industry: Hidden Communication Prior to Product Launch
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1