公共资源滥用中的腐败:心灵基因组学制图

Camilla Habsburg-Lothringen, Penina Deital, Robert Sherman
{"title":"公共资源滥用中的腐败:心灵基因组学制图","authors":"Camilla Habsburg-Lothringen, Penina Deital, Robert Sherman","doi":"10.31038/asmhs.2020412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a cartography of how people respond to statements about corruption in the use of public funds, using the procedures of Mind Genomics. Respondents read and rated short vignettes about corruption, systematically varied in four aspects, specifically who is IN CHARGE, FOR WHAT is the public money used, WHAT HAPPENED, and what were the EFFECTS, respectively. The data suggest that different elements drive ‘Makes me Angry,’ versus ‘Drives me to do Something’ versus ‘Engages my Attention.’ Mind Genomics further reveals mind-sets, showing different criteria that respondents used to evaluate the individual messages. The paper then shows how to assess the interactions between who is IN CHARGE and the other attributes, and how to measure the degree to which the ‘right person’ can reduce the seriousness of the corrupt act.","PeriodicalId":243213,"journal":{"name":"Ageing Science & Mental Health Studies","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corruption of in the Misuse of Public Resources: A Mind Genomics Cartography\",\"authors\":\"Camilla Habsburg-Lothringen, Penina Deital, Robert Sherman\",\"doi\":\"10.31038/asmhs.2020412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present a cartography of how people respond to statements about corruption in the use of public funds, using the procedures of Mind Genomics. Respondents read and rated short vignettes about corruption, systematically varied in four aspects, specifically who is IN CHARGE, FOR WHAT is the public money used, WHAT HAPPENED, and what were the EFFECTS, respectively. The data suggest that different elements drive ‘Makes me Angry,’ versus ‘Drives me to do Something’ versus ‘Engages my Attention.’ Mind Genomics further reveals mind-sets, showing different criteria that respondents used to evaluate the individual messages. The paper then shows how to assess the interactions between who is IN CHARGE and the other attributes, and how to measure the degree to which the ‘right person’ can reduce the seriousness of the corrupt act.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ageing Science & Mental Health Studies\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ageing Science & Mental Health Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31038/asmhs.2020412\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing Science & Mental Health Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31038/asmhs.2020412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们使用Mind Genomics的程序,展示了人们如何回应有关公共资金使用腐败的声明。受访者阅读并评价有关腐败的小短文,系统地从四个方面进行分类,分别是谁负责,公款用在哪里,发生了什么,以及产生了什么影响。数据表明,“让我生气”、“驱使我做某事”和“吸引我的注意力”是不同的因素。“思维基因组学”进一步揭示了思维模式,显示了受访者用来评估个别信息的不同标准。然后,本文展示了如何评估谁是负责人和其他属性之间的相互作用,以及如何衡量“合适的人”可以减少腐败行为严重性的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Corruption of in the Misuse of Public Resources: A Mind Genomics Cartography
We present a cartography of how people respond to statements about corruption in the use of public funds, using the procedures of Mind Genomics. Respondents read and rated short vignettes about corruption, systematically varied in four aspects, specifically who is IN CHARGE, FOR WHAT is the public money used, WHAT HAPPENED, and what were the EFFECTS, respectively. The data suggest that different elements drive ‘Makes me Angry,’ versus ‘Drives me to do Something’ versus ‘Engages my Attention.’ Mind Genomics further reveals mind-sets, showing different criteria that respondents used to evaluate the individual messages. The paper then shows how to assess the interactions between who is IN CHARGE and the other attributes, and how to measure the degree to which the ‘right person’ can reduce the seriousness of the corrupt act.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Depression among Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 Attending a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Oman Late Life Depression: Review of Perception, Assessment and Management in Community Dwellers A Sociology of Alzheimer’s Disease: Questioning the Etiology Path Analysis of the Impact of COVID-19-related Stress Response on Phobia and Anxiety Experienced by College Students Methods and Technologies of Internal Speech Recognition by Non-Invasive Neurointerfaces
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1