{"title":"改进了STGs的分解","authors":"W. Vogler, Ben Kangsah","doi":"10.1109/ACSD.2005.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Signal transition graphs (STGs) are a version of Petri nets for the specification of asynchronous circuit behaviour. It has been suggested to decompose such a specification as a first step; this leads to a modular implementation, which can support circuit synthesis by possibly avoiding state explosion or allowing the use of library elements. In a previous paper, the original method was extended and shown to be much more generally applicable than known before. But further extensions are necessary, and some are presented here, e.g.: to avoid dynamic auto-conflicts, the previous paper insisted on avoiding structural auto-conflicts, which is too restrictive; we show how to work with the latter type of auto-conflicts. This and another simple extension makes it necessary to restructure presentation and correctness proof of the decomposition algorithm.","PeriodicalId":279517,"journal":{"name":"Fifth International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design (ACSD'05)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved decomposition of STGs\",\"authors\":\"W. Vogler, Ben Kangsah\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACSD.2005.21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Signal transition graphs (STGs) are a version of Petri nets for the specification of asynchronous circuit behaviour. It has been suggested to decompose such a specification as a first step; this leads to a modular implementation, which can support circuit synthesis by possibly avoiding state explosion or allowing the use of library elements. In a previous paper, the original method was extended and shown to be much more generally applicable than known before. But further extensions are necessary, and some are presented here, e.g.: to avoid dynamic auto-conflicts, the previous paper insisted on avoiding structural auto-conflicts, which is too restrictive; we show how to work with the latter type of auto-conflicts. This and another simple extension makes it necessary to restructure presentation and correctness proof of the decomposition algorithm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":279517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fifth International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design (ACSD'05)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fifth International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design (ACSD'05)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSD.2005.21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fifth International Conference on Application of Concurrency to System Design (ACSD'05)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSD.2005.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Signal transition graphs (STGs) are a version of Petri nets for the specification of asynchronous circuit behaviour. It has been suggested to decompose such a specification as a first step; this leads to a modular implementation, which can support circuit synthesis by possibly avoiding state explosion or allowing the use of library elements. In a previous paper, the original method was extended and shown to be much more generally applicable than known before. But further extensions are necessary, and some are presented here, e.g.: to avoid dynamic auto-conflicts, the previous paper insisted on avoiding structural auto-conflicts, which is too restrictive; we show how to work with the latter type of auto-conflicts. This and another simple extension makes it necessary to restructure presentation and correctness proof of the decomposition algorithm.