在复杂的项目系统中促进公正和关怀:一项实证研究

Francesco Di Maddaloni, Roya Derakhshanalavijeh, R. Turner
{"title":"在复杂的项目系统中促进公正和关怀:一项实证研究","authors":"Francesco Di Maddaloni, Roya Derakhshanalavijeh, R. Turner","doi":"10.56889/nsev1595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While projects are becoming increasingly more complex in their organizational, technological, and environmental dimensions; complex systems are deemed by being unjust by nature. Previous research has suggested that heedful interconnection among the actors of the system can enhance organization’s capability in ethical coping with complexity. However, project-based organizations tend to cope with complexity through developing adaptive capacity within the borders of the organization and marginalizing the demands and concerns of some stakeholders. By investigating the controversial project of Rome Metro Line C and drawing on ethics of care and ethics of justice, this article suggests that coping with complexity is attainable by extending the organization’s border to include all stakeholders of the network. The empirical study proposes that by fostering the interrelation of a broader range of stakeholders with the organization through a decentralized decision making will improve the extended organization’s capability in identifying and absorbing complexity.","PeriodicalId":106417,"journal":{"name":"Value co-creation in the project society","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FOSTERING JUSTICE AND CARE IN COMPLEX PROJECT SYSTEMS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Di Maddaloni, Roya Derakhshanalavijeh, R. Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.56889/nsev1595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While projects are becoming increasingly more complex in their organizational, technological, and environmental dimensions; complex systems are deemed by being unjust by nature. Previous research has suggested that heedful interconnection among the actors of the system can enhance organization’s capability in ethical coping with complexity. However, project-based organizations tend to cope with complexity through developing adaptive capacity within the borders of the organization and marginalizing the demands and concerns of some stakeholders. By investigating the controversial project of Rome Metro Line C and drawing on ethics of care and ethics of justice, this article suggests that coping with complexity is attainable by extending the organization’s border to include all stakeholders of the network. The empirical study proposes that by fostering the interrelation of a broader range of stakeholders with the organization through a decentralized decision making will improve the extended organization’s capability in identifying and absorbing complexity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value co-creation in the project society\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value co-creation in the project society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56889/nsev1595\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value co-creation in the project society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56889/nsev1595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然项目在组织、技术和环境方面变得越来越复杂;复杂的系统被认为是不公正的。以往的研究表明,系统参与者之间的密切联系可以提高组织应对复杂性的道德能力。然而,基于项目的组织倾向于通过在组织边界内发展适应能力和边缘化一些利益相关者的需求和关注来应对复杂性。通过调查有争议的罗马地铁C线项目,并借鉴关怀伦理和正义伦理,本文建议通过扩展组织的边界,包括网络的所有利益相关者,来应对复杂性。实证研究表明,通过分散决策促进更广泛的利益相关者与组织的相互关系,将提高扩展后的组织识别和吸收复杂性的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FOSTERING JUSTICE AND CARE IN COMPLEX PROJECT SYSTEMS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY
While projects are becoming increasingly more complex in their organizational, technological, and environmental dimensions; complex systems are deemed by being unjust by nature. Previous research has suggested that heedful interconnection among the actors of the system can enhance organization’s capability in ethical coping with complexity. However, project-based organizations tend to cope with complexity through developing adaptive capacity within the borders of the organization and marginalizing the demands and concerns of some stakeholders. By investigating the controversial project of Rome Metro Line C and drawing on ethics of care and ethics of justice, this article suggests that coping with complexity is attainable by extending the organization’s border to include all stakeholders of the network. The empirical study proposes that by fostering the interrelation of a broader range of stakeholders with the organization through a decentralized decision making will improve the extended organization’s capability in identifying and absorbing complexity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ENHANCING POST-DISASTER RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGEMENT TRAINING THROUGH SCENARIO-BASED LEARNING STOP BUREAUCRACY REFORMS — CASE STUDY IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN SLOVAKIA KEY DETERMINANTS EXPLAINING DIFFERENCE IN CROSS-COUNTRY PROJECTS PERFORMANCES AMONG IMPLEMENTATION COUNTRIES IN AFRICAN CONTEXT SMART CITY CONCEPT: DIGITAL PLATFORM OF INVESTMENT LOCATIONS PEOPLE SKILLS, ORGANISATIONAL SKILLS, OR TECHNICAL SKILLS? WHICH COMPETENCIES ARE MORE IMPORTANT FOR PROJECT SUCCESS?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1