为什么我们需要一个不同的软件架构视图

Jason Baragry, K. Reed
{"title":"为什么我们需要一个不同的软件架构视图","authors":"Jason Baragry, K. Reed","doi":"10.1109/WICSA.2001.948419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The definition and understanding of software architectures and architecture views still shows considerable disagreement in the software engineering community. The paper argues that the problems we face exist because our understanding is based on specious analogies with traditionally engineered artefacts. A review of the history of ideas shows the evolution of this understanding. A detailed examination is then presented of the differences that exist between the nature of the systems, the content of their large-scale representations, and how they are used in practice in the respective disciplines. These differences seriously undermine the analogies used to develop our understanding and this is discussed in terms of software engineering as a whole.","PeriodicalId":339670,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why we need a different view of software architecture\",\"authors\":\"Jason Baragry, K. Reed\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WICSA.2001.948419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The definition and understanding of software architectures and architecture views still shows considerable disagreement in the software engineering community. The paper argues that the problems we face exist because our understanding is based on specious analogies with traditionally engineered artefacts. A review of the history of ideas shows the evolution of this understanding. A detailed examination is then presented of the differences that exist between the nature of the systems, the content of their large-scale representations, and how they are used in practice in the respective disciplines. These differences seriously undermine the analogies used to develop our understanding and this is discussed in terms of software engineering as a whole.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2001.948419\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2001.948419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

软件架构和架构视图的定义和理解在软件工程社区中仍然显示出相当大的分歧。本文认为,我们面临的问题之所以存在,是因为我们的理解是基于与传统工程人工制品似是而非的类比。对思想史的回顾显示了这种理解的演变。然后详细检查了系统的性质、它们的大规模表示的内容以及它们如何在各自学科的实践中使用之间存在的差异。这些差异严重地破坏了用来发展我们的理解的类比,这是在作为一个整体的软件工程方面讨论的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why we need a different view of software architecture
The definition and understanding of software architectures and architecture views still shows considerable disagreement in the software engineering community. The paper argues that the problems we face exist because our understanding is based on specious analogies with traditionally engineered artefacts. A review of the history of ideas shows the evolution of this understanding. A detailed examination is then presented of the differences that exist between the nature of the systems, the content of their large-scale representations, and how they are used in practice in the respective disciplines. These differences seriously undermine the analogies used to develop our understanding and this is discussed in terms of software engineering as a whole.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MAP - mining architectures for product line evaluations On the notion of variability in software product lines An architecture for distributing the computation of software clustering algorithms Is architecture a product that can be packaged and sold? SPIN-ning software architectures: a method for exploring complex systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1