分布式共享内存的时间旅行相干算法

Xiangyao Yu, S. Devadas
{"title":"分布式共享内存的时间旅行相干算法","authors":"Xiangyao Yu, S. Devadas","doi":"10.1109/PACT.2015.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A new memory coherence protocol, Tardis, is proposed. Tardis uses timestamp counters representing logical time as well as physical time to order memory operations and enforce sequential consistency in any type of shared memory system. Tardis is unique in that as compared to the widely-adopted directory coherence protocol, and its variants, it completely avoids multicasting and only requires O(log N) storage per cache block for an N-core system rather than O(N) sharer information. Tardis is simpler and easier to reason about, yet achieves similar performance to directory protocols on a wide range of benchmarks run on 16, 64 and 256 cores.","PeriodicalId":385398,"journal":{"name":"2015 International Conference on Parallel Architecture and Compilation (PACT)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tardis: Time Traveling Coherence Algorithm for Distributed Shared Memory\",\"authors\":\"Xiangyao Yu, S. Devadas\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PACT.2015.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A new memory coherence protocol, Tardis, is proposed. Tardis uses timestamp counters representing logical time as well as physical time to order memory operations and enforce sequential consistency in any type of shared memory system. Tardis is unique in that as compared to the widely-adopted directory coherence protocol, and its variants, it completely avoids multicasting and only requires O(log N) storage per cache block for an N-core system rather than O(N) sharer information. Tardis is simpler and easier to reason about, yet achieves similar performance to directory protocols on a wide range of benchmarks run on 16, 64 and 256 cores.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 International Conference on Parallel Architecture and Compilation (PACT)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 International Conference on Parallel Architecture and Compilation (PACT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PACT.2015.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 International Conference on Parallel Architecture and Compilation (PACT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PACT.2015.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

提出了一种新的内存一致性协议Tardis。Tardis使用时间戳计数器来表示逻辑时间和物理时间,以便在任何类型的共享内存系统中对内存操作进行排序并强制执行顺序一致性。与广泛采用的目录一致性协议及其变体相比,Tardis的独特之处在于,它完全避免了多播,并且对于N核系统,每个缓存块只需要O(log N)存储空间,而不是O(N)共享信息。Tardis更简单,更容易理解,但在16、64和256核上运行的广泛基准测试中,它的性能与目录协议相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tardis: Time Traveling Coherence Algorithm for Distributed Shared Memory
A new memory coherence protocol, Tardis, is proposed. Tardis uses timestamp counters representing logical time as well as physical time to order memory operations and enforce sequential consistency in any type of shared memory system. Tardis is unique in that as compared to the widely-adopted directory coherence protocol, and its variants, it completely avoids multicasting and only requires O(log N) storage per cache block for an N-core system rather than O(N) sharer information. Tardis is simpler and easier to reason about, yet achieves similar performance to directory protocols on a wide range of benchmarks run on 16, 64 and 256 cores.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Storage Consolidation on SSDs: Not Always a Panacea, but Can We Ease the Pain? AREP: Adaptive Resource Efficient Prefetching for Maximizing Multicore Performance NVMMU: A Non-volatile Memory Management Unit for Heterogeneous GPU-SSD Architectures Scalable Task Scheduling and Synchronization Using Hierarchical Effects Scalable SIMD-Efficient Graph Processing on GPUs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1