“你说什么就是什么”:tiktok禁忌语分析

Jurnal KATA Pub Date : 2021-10-29 DOI:10.22216/kata.v5i2.438
Salsabil Suha, Emy Sudarwati
{"title":"“你说什么就是什么”:tiktok禁忌语分析","authors":"Salsabil Suha, Emy Sudarwati","doi":"10.22216/kata.v5i2.438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to reveal the use of taboo words in the modernized communication application named TikTok. A total of 67 samples were found, classified into 9 types of taboo words proposed by Jay (2009). The dominant type of taboo word found in TikTok is psychological, physical, social deviation insults, with a quantity of 31,3%. This major category was followed by the second largest type, sexual references by 18%, and at the third level, ethnic-racial-gender slur, which counted as much as 16,4%. Hereinafter, the researchers found offensive slang as much as 14.9%, profane and blasphemy as much as 8.9%, scatological reference & disgusting objects as much as 6%, and animal names as much as 4.5%. During the analysis regarding taboo words in TikTok, the categories of ancestral allusion and substandard vulgar terms have not been found. These types of taboo words are then classified based on the motive for their use, namely to signify various emotions, to obtain certain outcomes, and to express the speaker’s anger and frustration.","PeriodicalId":159474,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal KATA","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WHAT YOU ARE IS WHAT YOU SAY’: AN ANALYSIS OF TABOO WORDS ON TIKTOK\",\"authors\":\"Salsabil Suha, Emy Sudarwati\",\"doi\":\"10.22216/kata.v5i2.438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to reveal the use of taboo words in the modernized communication application named TikTok. A total of 67 samples were found, classified into 9 types of taboo words proposed by Jay (2009). The dominant type of taboo word found in TikTok is psychological, physical, social deviation insults, with a quantity of 31,3%. This major category was followed by the second largest type, sexual references by 18%, and at the third level, ethnic-racial-gender slur, which counted as much as 16,4%. Hereinafter, the researchers found offensive slang as much as 14.9%, profane and blasphemy as much as 8.9%, scatological reference & disgusting objects as much as 6%, and animal names as much as 4.5%. During the analysis regarding taboo words in TikTok, the categories of ancestral allusion and substandard vulgar terms have not been found. These types of taboo words are then classified based on the motive for their use, namely to signify various emotions, to obtain certain outcomes, and to express the speaker’s anger and frustration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":159474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal KATA\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal KATA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22216/kata.v5i2.438\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal KATA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22216/kata.v5i2.438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在揭示现代通信应用TikTok中禁忌语的使用。共发现67个样本,将其分为Jay(2009)提出的9类禁忌语。在抖音中发现的禁忌语类型主要是心理、身体、社会偏差的侮辱,数量为31.3%。紧随这一主要类别之后的是第二大类型,性暗示占18%,第三个级别是种族-种族-性别诽谤,占16.4%。在此之后,研究人员发现攻击性俚语高达14.9%,亵渎和亵渎高达8.9%,淫秽和恶心物品高达6%,动物名字高达4.5%。在对抖音禁忌语的分析中,没有发现祖先典故和不合标准的粗俗词汇的类别。然后根据使用禁忌语的动机对这些禁忌语进行分类,即表示各种情绪,获得某种结果,表达说话人的愤怒和沮丧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
WHAT YOU ARE IS WHAT YOU SAY’: AN ANALYSIS OF TABOO WORDS ON TIKTOK
This study aims to reveal the use of taboo words in the modernized communication application named TikTok. A total of 67 samples were found, classified into 9 types of taboo words proposed by Jay (2009). The dominant type of taboo word found in TikTok is psychological, physical, social deviation insults, with a quantity of 31,3%. This major category was followed by the second largest type, sexual references by 18%, and at the third level, ethnic-racial-gender slur, which counted as much as 16,4%. Hereinafter, the researchers found offensive slang as much as 14.9%, profane and blasphemy as much as 8.9%, scatological reference & disgusting objects as much as 6%, and animal names as much as 4.5%. During the analysis regarding taboo words in TikTok, the categories of ancestral allusion and substandard vulgar terms have not been found. These types of taboo words are then classified based on the motive for their use, namely to signify various emotions, to obtain certain outcomes, and to express the speaker’s anger and frustration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ERROR ANALYSIS OF KOREAN PARTICLE-PREDICATE COLLOCATION BY INDONESIAN SPEAKERS TEMPORARY WORKER ALIENATION IN HIROKO OYAMADA’S NOVEL KOUJOU TOUR GUIDE ATTITUDE AND TOURIST RESPONSE IN VIRTUAL TOUR: APPRAISAL ANALYSIS THE MEANING OF ADVICE SIGNS IN DIWAN ALI BIN ABI THALIB THE STUDY OF PRAGMATIC SEMIOTICS MAPPING METAPHORIC AND NATURALISTIC ECOLINGUISTIC DIMENSIONS IN LEARNING THE INDONESIAN LANGUAGE AT THE UNIVERSITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1