政治权力、集体记忆与美国中心城市:保守精英对城市的反记忆话语

A. J. Jacobs
{"title":"政治权力、集体记忆与美国中心城市:保守精英对城市的反记忆话语","authors":"A. J. Jacobs","doi":"10.2174/1874942900801010025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the social construction of collective memory regarding American cities. Inspired by postmodern theory, both critical and urban, it argues that, in its efforts to expand its political power, the Conservative Elite has successfully waged a thirty year “mnemonic war” over the public memory of America’s central cities. It describes how in their attack, the Conservatives strategically utilized four vehicles of public discourse: political rhetoric, mass media depictions, think tank scholarship, and spatial semiosis. In doing so, the Conservatives have crafted a false consciousness or counter-memory of the city, a depiction which has served to diminish the social and economic value of U.S. central cities, and ultimately, characterized them as Foucaultian heterotopias of deviance (anti-utopias). By recasting the collective memory of the city, the Conservatives have harnessed and defused its historical and present power, squashed any related dissent, and expanded their influence across the metropolitan, national, and international landscapes.","PeriodicalId":106409,"journal":{"name":"The Open Urban Studies Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political Power, Collective Memory, and American Central Cities: The Discourses of the Conservative Elite’s Counter-Memory of the City\",\"authors\":\"A. J. Jacobs\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874942900801010025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines the social construction of collective memory regarding American cities. Inspired by postmodern theory, both critical and urban, it argues that, in its efforts to expand its political power, the Conservative Elite has successfully waged a thirty year “mnemonic war” over the public memory of America’s central cities. It describes how in their attack, the Conservatives strategically utilized four vehicles of public discourse: political rhetoric, mass media depictions, think tank scholarship, and spatial semiosis. In doing so, the Conservatives have crafted a false consciousness or counter-memory of the city, a depiction which has served to diminish the social and economic value of U.S. central cities, and ultimately, characterized them as Foucaultian heterotopias of deviance (anti-utopias). By recasting the collective memory of the city, the Conservatives have harnessed and defused its historical and present power, squashed any related dissent, and expanded their influence across the metropolitan, national, and international landscapes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Urban Studies Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Urban Studies Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874942900801010025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Urban Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874942900801010025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究考察了美国城市集体记忆的社会建构。受后现代批判和城市理论的启发,该书认为,在努力扩大其政治权力的过程中,保守派精英成功地对美国中心城市的公众记忆发动了一场长达30年的“记忆战争”。它描述了在他们的攻击中,保守党如何战略性地利用了四种公共话语工具:政治修辞、大众媒体描述、智库奖学金和空间符号学。在这样做的过程中,保守党制造了一种错误的意识或对城市的反记忆,这种描述削弱了美国中心城市的社会和经济价值,并最终将它们描述为福柯式的越界异托邦(反乌托邦)。通过重塑城市的集体记忆,保守党利用并化解了其历史和现在的力量,压制了任何相关的异议,并在大都市、全国乃至国际范围内扩大了他们的影响力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Political Power, Collective Memory, and American Central Cities: The Discourses of the Conservative Elite’s Counter-Memory of the City
This study examines the social construction of collective memory regarding American cities. Inspired by postmodern theory, both critical and urban, it argues that, in its efforts to expand its political power, the Conservative Elite has successfully waged a thirty year “mnemonic war” over the public memory of America’s central cities. It describes how in their attack, the Conservatives strategically utilized four vehicles of public discourse: political rhetoric, mass media depictions, think tank scholarship, and spatial semiosis. In doing so, the Conservatives have crafted a false consciousness or counter-memory of the city, a depiction which has served to diminish the social and economic value of U.S. central cities, and ultimately, characterized them as Foucaultian heterotopias of deviance (anti-utopias). By recasting the collective memory of the city, the Conservatives have harnessed and defused its historical and present power, squashed any related dissent, and expanded their influence across the metropolitan, national, and international landscapes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learning to Use ‘Public Space’: Urban Space in Post-Soviet St. Petersburg Intercultural climate and belonging in the globalizing multi-ethnic neighborhoods of Los Angeles Paradoxes of studentification: social mix versus gentrification in a disadvantaged neighborhood in Amsterdam East ‘Being’ in Al-Azhar Park: Public Spaces in Cairo Rethink Your Public Space: Community Events in Gentrified Brooklyn
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1