巴西左派和右派的道德、行动主义和激进主义

M. G. Filho, J. Modesto
{"title":"巴西左派和右派的道德、行动主义和激进主义","authors":"M. G. Filho, J. Modesto","doi":"10.9788/tp2019.3-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last few years, there has been a rising tension in Brazilian politics between individuals who identify as left-wing and those who identity as right-wing. Sometimes those tensions have resulted in radical behavior from people who identify with either side of the political spectrum. This paper has two main goals: (a) to investigate (using the Moral Foundations Theory as a basis) the moral matrices of participants who identify as being left, center-left, center-right, and right; and (b) to compare the indices of activism and radicalism between participants with diff erent political orientations. There were 226 participants in the study, most of which were from the Federal District (64.16%). The participants answered an online survey composed of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire, the Activism and Radicalism Intention Scale, and informed demographic data (including their polit ical preference). Diff erences were found in the moral matrices of participants with diff erent political positions. Higher indices of activism and radicalism were found among participants who self-declared as being left and center-left. Based on the fi eld’s literature, the perception of unfairness held by individuals who identify as left in the current political context may help to understand these fi ndings.","PeriodicalId":142063,"journal":{"name":"Temas em Psicologia","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Morality, Activism and Radicalism in the Brazilian Left and the Brazilian Right\",\"authors\":\"M. G. Filho, J. Modesto\",\"doi\":\"10.9788/tp2019.3-12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the last few years, there has been a rising tension in Brazilian politics between individuals who identify as left-wing and those who identity as right-wing. Sometimes those tensions have resulted in radical behavior from people who identify with either side of the political spectrum. This paper has two main goals: (a) to investigate (using the Moral Foundations Theory as a basis) the moral matrices of participants who identify as being left, center-left, center-right, and right; and (b) to compare the indices of activism and radicalism between participants with diff erent political orientations. There were 226 participants in the study, most of which were from the Federal District (64.16%). The participants answered an online survey composed of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire, the Activism and Radicalism Intention Scale, and informed demographic data (including their polit ical preference). Diff erences were found in the moral matrices of participants with diff erent political positions. Higher indices of activism and radicalism were found among participants who self-declared as being left and center-left. Based on the fi eld’s literature, the perception of unfairness held by individuals who identify as left in the current political context may help to understand these fi ndings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Temas em Psicologia\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Temas em Psicologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9788/tp2019.3-12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Temas em Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9788/tp2019.3-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在过去的几年里,巴西政治中左翼人士和右翼人士之间的关系日益紧张。有时,这种紧张关系会导致认同政治光谱任何一方的人做出激进的行为。本文的主要目的有两个:(a)以道德基础理论为基础,调查认同为左派、中左派、中右派和右派的参与者的道德矩阵;(b)比较不同政治取向的参与者的行动主义和激进主义指数。该研究共有226名参与者,其中大部分来自联邦区(64.16%)。参与者回答了一项在线调查,包括道德基础问卷、行动主义和激进主义意向量表,以及知情的人口统计数据(包括他们的政治偏好)。不同政治立场的参与者的道德矩阵存在差异。在自称为左派和中左派的参与者中,激进主义和激进主义的指数更高。根据该领域的文献,在当前政治背景下被认为是左翼的个人对不公平的看法可能有助于理解这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Morality, Activism and Radicalism in the Brazilian Left and the Brazilian Right
In the last few years, there has been a rising tension in Brazilian politics between individuals who identify as left-wing and those who identity as right-wing. Sometimes those tensions have resulted in radical behavior from people who identify with either side of the political spectrum. This paper has two main goals: (a) to investigate (using the Moral Foundations Theory as a basis) the moral matrices of participants who identify as being left, center-left, center-right, and right; and (b) to compare the indices of activism and radicalism between participants with diff erent political orientations. There were 226 participants in the study, most of which were from the Federal District (64.16%). The participants answered an online survey composed of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire, the Activism and Radicalism Intention Scale, and informed demographic data (including their polit ical preference). Diff erences were found in the moral matrices of participants with diff erent political positions. Higher indices of activism and radicalism were found among participants who self-declared as being left and center-left. Based on the fi eld’s literature, the perception of unfairness held by individuals who identify as left in the current political context may help to understand these fi ndings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health Professionals Men tal Health A oo at their Su erin Peers as Agents of Dating Violence Prevention: Feasibility Analysis of an Intervention Community Resilience: A Case Study of a Community of Fortaleza, CE Representational Structure of Vitiligo: Non-Restrictive Skin Marks Cannabis Legalization: Perceptions of Psychiatrists and Recovering Users
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1