南南方共同市场和南部非洲发展共同体的新区域主义:比较和区域间视角

Philani Mthembu
{"title":"南南方共同市场和南部非洲发展共同体的新区域主义:比较和区域间视角","authors":"Philani Mthembu","doi":"10.25159/0256-6060/654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author identifies gaps and a particular bias in research focused on regionalism, noting that research is Eurocentric in terms of conceptual development and empirical data. Research also tends to focus on single regions, making it difficult to speak of a theory on regionalism. Instead, most theories are adapted to the EU case study or even developed out of the EU as a case study, contributing to an EU bias. The author also identifies a lack of comparative analysis as a weakness in the research; where it has been done, the EU is used as a prototype and benchmark for other regions, irrespective of their own logics for creating regional projects. This contributes to the perception that other regions are less successful compared with the EU.","PeriodicalId":442570,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Report","volume":"408 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NEW REGIONALISM IN THE SOUTH - MERCOSUR AND SADC IN A COMPARATIVE AND INTERREGIONAL PERSPECTIVE\",\"authors\":\"Philani Mthembu\",\"doi\":\"10.25159/0256-6060/654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author identifies gaps and a particular bias in research focused on regionalism, noting that research is Eurocentric in terms of conceptual development and empirical data. Research also tends to focus on single regions, making it difficult to speak of a theory on regionalism. Instead, most theories are adapted to the EU case study or even developed out of the EU as a case study, contributing to an EU bias. The author also identifies a lack of comparative analysis as a weakness in the research; where it has been done, the EU is used as a prototype and benchmark for other regions, irrespective of their own logics for creating regional projects. This contributes to the perception that other regions are less successful compared with the EU.\",\"PeriodicalId\":442570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin American Report\",\"volume\":\"408 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin American Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25159/0256-6060/654\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/0256-6060/654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

作者指出了区域主义研究的差距和特别的偏见,指出研究在概念发展和经验数据方面是以欧洲为中心的。研究也倾向于集中在单一地区,这使得很难谈论关于地区主义的理论。相反,大多数理论都适用于欧盟案例研究,甚至是在欧盟案例研究之外发展起来的,这导致了欧盟偏见。作者还指出,缺乏比较分析是研究的一个弱点;在已经完成的地方,欧盟被用作其他地区的原型和基准,而不管他们自己创建区域项目的逻辑如何。这导致人们认为,与欧盟相比,其他地区没有那么成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NEW REGIONALISM IN THE SOUTH - MERCOSUR AND SADC IN A COMPARATIVE AND INTERREGIONAL PERSPECTIVE
The author identifies gaps and a particular bias in research focused on regionalism, noting that research is Eurocentric in terms of conceptual development and empirical data. Research also tends to focus on single regions, making it difficult to speak of a theory on regionalism. Instead, most theories are adapted to the EU case study or even developed out of the EU as a case study, contributing to an EU bias. The author also identifies a lack of comparative analysis as a weakness in the research; where it has been done, the EU is used as a prototype and benchmark for other regions, irrespective of their own logics for creating regional projects. This contributes to the perception that other regions are less successful compared with the EU.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Underlying Drivers of Transnational Terrorism in Africa’s Sahel Region and Counter-terrorism Policy Interventions Echoes from the Global South: Reflections on the Student Public Intellectual, Hashtags and Neoliberal Themes in the #FeesMustFall Student Protests in South Africa (2015–2016) Geopolitical Conflict around the Climate Emergency: The Case of Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon Latin America and the Caribbean: Trends Outlook for Quarter 1, 2020 Can ASEAN Play a Leading Role in Resolving Myanmar’s Crisis?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1