甲骨文很难实现,也很难理解:软件测试研究人员的自白

W. Chan, T. Tse
{"title":"甲骨文很难实现,也很难理解:软件测试研究人员的自白","authors":"W. Chan, T. Tse","doi":"10.1109/QSIC.2013.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In software testing, a test oracle refers to the mechanism for determining whether the results of the software under test agree with the expected outcomes. To achieve this, we need a means to determine the expected outcomes, a means to gauge the actual results, and a means to decide whether the actual results agree with the expected outcomes. In real-life situations, however, a test oracle may not exist owing to a missing link in any of these aspects. In this paper, we summarize our research for the last 15 years on selected issues related to each of these aspects. We present the use of metamorphic testing, pattern classification, and formal object equivalence and nonequivalence to alleviate the problems.","PeriodicalId":404921,"journal":{"name":"2013 13th International Conference on Quality Software","volume":"130 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oracles Are Hardly Attain'd, and Hardly Understood: Confessions of Software Testing Researchers\",\"authors\":\"W. Chan, T. Tse\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QSIC.2013.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In software testing, a test oracle refers to the mechanism for determining whether the results of the software under test agree with the expected outcomes. To achieve this, we need a means to determine the expected outcomes, a means to gauge the actual results, and a means to decide whether the actual results agree with the expected outcomes. In real-life situations, however, a test oracle may not exist owing to a missing link in any of these aspects. In this paper, we summarize our research for the last 15 years on selected issues related to each of these aspects. We present the use of metamorphic testing, pattern classification, and formal object equivalence and nonequivalence to alleviate the problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 13th International Conference on Quality Software\",\"volume\":\"130 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 13th International Conference on Quality Software\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QSIC.2013.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 13th International Conference on Quality Software","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QSIC.2013.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在软件测试中,测试oracle指的是确定被测软件的结果是否与预期结果一致的机制。为了实现这一点,我们需要一种方法来确定预期结果,一种方法来衡量实际结果,以及一种方法来决定实际结果是否与预期结果一致。然而,在实际情况中,测试oracle可能不存在,因为这些方面中的任何一个环节都缺失了。在本文中,我们总结了我们的研究在过去15年有关这些方面的选择问题。我们提出使用变质检验、模式分类、形式对象等价和非等价来缓解这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Oracles Are Hardly Attain'd, and Hardly Understood: Confessions of Software Testing Researchers
In software testing, a test oracle refers to the mechanism for determining whether the results of the software under test agree with the expected outcomes. To achieve this, we need a means to determine the expected outcomes, a means to gauge the actual results, and a means to decide whether the actual results agree with the expected outcomes. In real-life situations, however, a test oracle may not exist owing to a missing link in any of these aspects. In this paper, we summarize our research for the last 15 years on selected issues related to each of these aspects. We present the use of metamorphic testing, pattern classification, and formal object equivalence and nonequivalence to alleviate the problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adaptive Combinatorial Testing Considerations in Designing Human-Computer Interfaces for Elderly People The ART of Divide and Conquer: An Innovative Approach to Improving the Efficiency of Adaptive Random Testing An Empirical Study of Adoption of Software Testing in Open Source Projects Supporting Reliability Modeling and Analysis for Component-Based Software Architecture: An XML-Based Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1