结合一流的测量测量,提供最精确的井筒位置

Mahmoud ElGizawy, R. Lowdon, D. Aklestad, Paul Strain, Fraser Boyce
{"title":"结合一流的测量测量,提供最精确的井筒位置","authors":"Mahmoud ElGizawy, R. Lowdon, D. Aklestad, Paul Strain, Fraser Boyce","doi":"10.2118/212547-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A survey program is designed for every well drilled to meet the well objective of penetrating the target reservoir and avoiding colliding with other offset wells. The selection of the wellbore survey tools within the survey program is limited in number and accuracy by the current surveying technologies available in the industry. This article demonstrates how a higher level of accuracy can be achieved to meet challenging well objectives when the accuracy of the most accurate wellbore surveying technology individually is not sufficient.\n This highest level of wellbore positioning accuracy to date is achieved by combing two wellbore positions of the same wellbore trajectory. The first wellbore position is calculated using the latest technology of magnetic Measurement-While-Drilling (MWD) Definitive Dynamic Surveys (DDS). The accuracy of the MWD DDS has been enhanced by correcting potential error sources such as misalignment of the survey package from the borehole, drill-string magnetic interference and limited global geomagnetic reference and accelerometer sensor accuracy. Further, the MWD DDS inclination accuracy is improved using an independent inclination measurement from the Rotary Steerable System (RSS). Hence the first position is derived from magnetic MWD DDS after applying In-Field Referencing (IFR), Multi-Station Analysis (MSA), Bottom Hole Assembly (BHA) sag correction (SAG), and Dual-Inclination (DI) corrections. A Second wellbore position is calculated using the latest technology in Gyro-measurement-While-Drilling (GWD).\n The results and comparisons of multiple runs are presented. The highest accuracy of wellbore positioning had been proven in successful case studies by penetrating a very small reservoir target on an extended reach well that was unfeasible using either the most accurate enhanced MWD DDS or the latest GWD technology. The presented case study shows how the wellbore objectives of penetrating the tight target reservoir had been confirmed by Logging-While-Drilling (LWD) images and interpretation of the subsurface team. This gave the highest accuracy of the wellbore position accuracy to date while drilling assured placing the well with higher confidence to maximize reservoir production without colliding with nearby offset wells.\n In reservoir sections, the wellbore survey accuracy limits boreholes' lateral and true vertical depth spacing, constraining reservoir production. In the top and intermediate sections, wellbore survey accuracy limits how close the well can be drilled in the proximity of other offset wells. This directly impacts the complexity of the directional work and the cost per drilled foot. This technique unlocks the potential to improve the wellbore positioning accuracy significantly. It demonstrates the highest wellbore positioning accuracy achieved to date when compared to the latest magnetic MWD surveys after correcting all known errors compared to the GWD.","PeriodicalId":255336,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, March 09, 2023","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining Best-in-Class Surveying Measurements to Provide the Most Accurate Wellbore Position\",\"authors\":\"Mahmoud ElGizawy, R. Lowdon, D. Aklestad, Paul Strain, Fraser Boyce\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/212547-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n A survey program is designed for every well drilled to meet the well objective of penetrating the target reservoir and avoiding colliding with other offset wells. The selection of the wellbore survey tools within the survey program is limited in number and accuracy by the current surveying technologies available in the industry. This article demonstrates how a higher level of accuracy can be achieved to meet challenging well objectives when the accuracy of the most accurate wellbore surveying technology individually is not sufficient.\\n This highest level of wellbore positioning accuracy to date is achieved by combing two wellbore positions of the same wellbore trajectory. The first wellbore position is calculated using the latest technology of magnetic Measurement-While-Drilling (MWD) Definitive Dynamic Surveys (DDS). The accuracy of the MWD DDS has been enhanced by correcting potential error sources such as misalignment of the survey package from the borehole, drill-string magnetic interference and limited global geomagnetic reference and accelerometer sensor accuracy. Further, the MWD DDS inclination accuracy is improved using an independent inclination measurement from the Rotary Steerable System (RSS). Hence the first position is derived from magnetic MWD DDS after applying In-Field Referencing (IFR), Multi-Station Analysis (MSA), Bottom Hole Assembly (BHA) sag correction (SAG), and Dual-Inclination (DI) corrections. A Second wellbore position is calculated using the latest technology in Gyro-measurement-While-Drilling (GWD).\\n The results and comparisons of multiple runs are presented. The highest accuracy of wellbore positioning had been proven in successful case studies by penetrating a very small reservoir target on an extended reach well that was unfeasible using either the most accurate enhanced MWD DDS or the latest GWD technology. The presented case study shows how the wellbore objectives of penetrating the tight target reservoir had been confirmed by Logging-While-Drilling (LWD) images and interpretation of the subsurface team. This gave the highest accuracy of the wellbore position accuracy to date while drilling assured placing the well with higher confidence to maximize reservoir production without colliding with nearby offset wells.\\n In reservoir sections, the wellbore survey accuracy limits boreholes' lateral and true vertical depth spacing, constraining reservoir production. In the top and intermediate sections, wellbore survey accuracy limits how close the well can be drilled in the proximity of other offset wells. This directly impacts the complexity of the directional work and the cost per drilled foot. This technique unlocks the potential to improve the wellbore positioning accuracy significantly. It demonstrates the highest wellbore positioning accuracy achieved to date when compared to the latest magnetic MWD surveys after correcting all known errors compared to the GWD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":255336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Thu, March 09, 2023\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Thu, March 09, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/212547-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, March 09, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212547-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

每口井都设计了一套测量方案,以满足穿透目标储层和避免与其他邻井发生碰撞的井目标。由于目前行业中可用的测量技术,在测量程序中,井眼测量工具的选择在数量和精度上都受到限制。本文演示了当最精确的井眼测量技术的精度不够时,如何实现更高的精度,以满足具有挑战性的井眼目标。迄今为止,这种最高水平的井眼定位精度是通过结合相同井眼轨迹的两个井眼位置来实现的。第一个井眼位置是使用最新的随钻磁测量(MWD)确定动态测量(DDS)技术计算的。通过校正潜在的误差源,如测量包与井眼的不对准、钻柱的磁干扰以及有限的全球地磁参考和加速度计传感器精度,MWD DDS的精度得到了提高。此外,利用来自旋转导向系统(RSS)的独立倾角测量,MWD DDS的倾角精度得到了提高。因此,在应用现场参考(IFR)、多站分析(MSA)、底部钻具组合(BHA)下陷校正(sag)和双倾角校正(DI)后,通过磁性随钻DDS获得第一个位置。第二个井眼位置是使用最新的随钻陀螺仪测量(GWD)技术计算的。给出了多次运行的结果和比较。在成功的案例研究中,通过在大位移井中穿透非常小的储层目标,证明了最高的井眼定位精度,而使用最精确的增强型MWD DDS或最新的GWD技术都是不可行的。该案例研究展示了如何通过随钻测井(LWD)图像和地下团队的解释来确定穿透致密目标储层的井眼目标。该系统提供了迄今为止最高的井眼定位精度,同时确保了钻井的置信度,从而最大限度地提高了油藏产量,而不会与附近的邻井发生碰撞。在油藏段,井眼测量精度限制了井眼的横向和垂直深度间距,限制了油藏的产量。在顶部和中间段,井眼测量精度限制了该井与其他邻井之间的钻进距离。这直接影响了定向工作的复杂性和每钻英尺的成本。该技术可以显著提高井眼定位精度。在修正了与GWD相比的所有已知误差后,与最新的磁随钻测量相比,它展示了迄今为止最高的井眼定位精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Combining Best-in-Class Surveying Measurements to Provide the Most Accurate Wellbore Position
A survey program is designed for every well drilled to meet the well objective of penetrating the target reservoir and avoiding colliding with other offset wells. The selection of the wellbore survey tools within the survey program is limited in number and accuracy by the current surveying technologies available in the industry. This article demonstrates how a higher level of accuracy can be achieved to meet challenging well objectives when the accuracy of the most accurate wellbore surveying technology individually is not sufficient. This highest level of wellbore positioning accuracy to date is achieved by combing two wellbore positions of the same wellbore trajectory. The first wellbore position is calculated using the latest technology of magnetic Measurement-While-Drilling (MWD) Definitive Dynamic Surveys (DDS). The accuracy of the MWD DDS has been enhanced by correcting potential error sources such as misalignment of the survey package from the borehole, drill-string magnetic interference and limited global geomagnetic reference and accelerometer sensor accuracy. Further, the MWD DDS inclination accuracy is improved using an independent inclination measurement from the Rotary Steerable System (RSS). Hence the first position is derived from magnetic MWD DDS after applying In-Field Referencing (IFR), Multi-Station Analysis (MSA), Bottom Hole Assembly (BHA) sag correction (SAG), and Dual-Inclination (DI) corrections. A Second wellbore position is calculated using the latest technology in Gyro-measurement-While-Drilling (GWD). The results and comparisons of multiple runs are presented. The highest accuracy of wellbore positioning had been proven in successful case studies by penetrating a very small reservoir target on an extended reach well that was unfeasible using either the most accurate enhanced MWD DDS or the latest GWD technology. The presented case study shows how the wellbore objectives of penetrating the tight target reservoir had been confirmed by Logging-While-Drilling (LWD) images and interpretation of the subsurface team. This gave the highest accuracy of the wellbore position accuracy to date while drilling assured placing the well with higher confidence to maximize reservoir production without colliding with nearby offset wells. In reservoir sections, the wellbore survey accuracy limits boreholes' lateral and true vertical depth spacing, constraining reservoir production. In the top and intermediate sections, wellbore survey accuracy limits how close the well can be drilled in the proximity of other offset wells. This directly impacts the complexity of the directional work and the cost per drilled foot. This technique unlocks the potential to improve the wellbore positioning accuracy significantly. It demonstrates the highest wellbore positioning accuracy achieved to date when compared to the latest magnetic MWD surveys after correcting all known errors compared to the GWD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geothermal Drilling – Collaborative and Holistic Applications Specific Solutions Drive Consistent Improvements in Drilling Efficiency and Operational Costs Downhole Trajectory Automation of RSS Tools: Autonomous Drilling Becomes Reality While-Drilling Pore Pressure Surveillance Using Machine Learning Drilling Three-Mile Laterals Tighter and Safer with a New Magnetic Reference Technique Continuous or Stacked Cement Bond Logs – Does It Matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1