惯例理论与经济学

Alain Rallet, David Motlow
{"title":"惯例理论与经济学","authors":"Alain Rallet, David Motlow","doi":"10.3406/RESO.1995.3295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary: This article examines the contribution of the economy of conventions to economic analysis. It is part of current research into economic agents' modes of coordination, based on a critique of standard neoclassical theory. Throughout this research, the main aim of the economy of conventions is to establish a dialectic of the individual and the collective within coordination mechanisms. In so doing, it advances theoretical propositions on the nature of individuals and organizations, as well as on the procedure for transitions from one to the other. The argument defended in this article is that such a research programme is incompatible with the postulate of methodological individualism from which the conventionalists claim to draw their inspiration. But is is not compatible with holism either. It thus implies questioning the basis for the opposition between individualism and holism, that is, the division of labour between the social sciences at the end of the last century. It is therefore not clear how the economy of conventions could renew economic analysis without challenging its foundations.","PeriodicalId":213999,"journal":{"name":"Réseaux. The French journal of communication","volume":"51 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Convention Theory and Economics\",\"authors\":\"Alain Rallet, David Motlow\",\"doi\":\"10.3406/RESO.1995.3295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary: This article examines the contribution of the economy of conventions to economic analysis. It is part of current research into economic agents' modes of coordination, based on a critique of standard neoclassical theory. Throughout this research, the main aim of the economy of conventions is to establish a dialectic of the individual and the collective within coordination mechanisms. In so doing, it advances theoretical propositions on the nature of individuals and organizations, as well as on the procedure for transitions from one to the other. The argument defended in this article is that such a research programme is incompatible with the postulate of methodological individualism from which the conventionalists claim to draw their inspiration. But is is not compatible with holism either. It thus implies questioning the basis for the opposition between individualism and holism, that is, the division of labour between the social sciences at the end of the last century. It is therefore not clear how the economy of conventions could renew economic analysis without challenging its foundations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":213999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Réseaux. The French journal of communication\",\"volume\":\"51 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Réseaux. The French journal of communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3406/RESO.1995.3295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Réseaux. The French journal of communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/RESO.1995.3295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:本文考察了公约经济学对经济分析的贡献。它是当前基于对标准新古典主义理论的批判,对经济主体协调模式的研究的一部分。在整个研究过程中,公约经济的主要目的是在协调机制内建立个人与集体的辩证法。在这样做的过程中,它提出了关于个人和组织的性质以及从一个到另一个过渡过程的理论命题。本文所捍卫的论点是,这种研究纲领与传统主义者声称从中汲取灵感的方法论个人主义的假设是不相容的。但它也与整体论不相容。因此,它意味着质疑个人主义和整体主义之间对立的基础,即上世纪末社会科学之间的分工。因此,不清楚公约经济如何能够在不挑战其基础的情况下更新经济分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Convention Theory and Economics
Summary: This article examines the contribution of the economy of conventions to economic analysis. It is part of current research into economic agents' modes of coordination, based on a critique of standard neoclassical theory. Throughout this research, the main aim of the economy of conventions is to establish a dialectic of the individual and the collective within coordination mechanisms. In so doing, it advances theoretical propositions on the nature of individuals and organizations, as well as on the procedure for transitions from one to the other. The argument defended in this article is that such a research programme is incompatible with the postulate of methodological individualism from which the conventionalists claim to draw their inspiration. But is is not compatible with holism either. It thus implies questioning the basis for the opposition between individualism and holism, that is, the division of labour between the social sciences at the end of the last century. It is therefore not clear how the economy of conventions could renew economic analysis without challenging its foundations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pluralisme et infomédiation sociale de l'actualité : le cas de Twitter Creation of value on the Internet Mediation and Social History of Art Accounting for viewing styles: viewers' negotiation with TV as a cultural offering. The intentions of communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1