Usha Martin Limited诉Eastern gas Limited

Sonam Kumari
{"title":"Usha Martin Limited诉Eastern gas Limited","authors":"Sonam Kumari","doi":"10.59126/v2i4a14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Usha Martin Limited (hereinafter referred to as the \"petitioner/award debtor\" or \"Applicant\") has filed this application (hereinafter referred to as AP 486/2017) with this Court pursuant to Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, asking for the annulment of an arbitration award dated February 3, 2017, issued by the West Bengal State Micro Small Enterprises Facilitation Council ('WBSMSEFC' or 'Council'), in favor The award holder has petitioned this Court for the execution of the aforementioned arbitral award by filing an execution application (EC 330/2017) in accordance with Section 36 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996. The parties have filed many interlocutory applications in both cases.","PeriodicalId":424180,"journal":{"name":"THE JOURNAL OF UNIQUE LAWS AND STUDENTS","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usha Martin Limited vs. Eastern Gases Limited\",\"authors\":\"Sonam Kumari\",\"doi\":\"10.59126/v2i4a14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Usha Martin Limited (hereinafter referred to as the \\\"petitioner/award debtor\\\" or \\\"Applicant\\\") has filed this application (hereinafter referred to as AP 486/2017) with this Court pursuant to Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, asking for the annulment of an arbitration award dated February 3, 2017, issued by the West Bengal State Micro Small Enterprises Facilitation Council ('WBSMSEFC' or 'Council'), in favor The award holder has petitioned this Court for the execution of the aforementioned arbitral award by filing an execution application (EC 330/2017) in accordance with Section 36 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996. The parties have filed many interlocutory applications in both cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THE JOURNAL OF UNIQUE LAWS AND STUDENTS\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THE JOURNAL OF UNIQUE LAWS AND STUDENTS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59126/v2i4a14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE JOURNAL OF UNIQUE LAWS AND STUDENTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59126/v2i4a14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Usha Martin Limited(以下简称“请愿人/裁决债务人”或“申请人”)已根据1996年“仲裁与调解法”第34条向本法院提交本申请(以下简称AP 486/2017),要求撤销西孟加拉邦微型小企业促进委员会(“WBSMSEFC”或“委员会”)于2017年2月3日发布的仲裁裁决。裁决持有人已根据1996年《仲裁与调解法》第36条提交执行申请(EC 330/2017),请求本院执行上述仲裁裁决。双方在这两起案件中都提出了许多中间申请。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Usha Martin Limited vs. Eastern Gases Limited
Usha Martin Limited (hereinafter referred to as the "petitioner/award debtor" or "Applicant") has filed this application (hereinafter referred to as AP 486/2017) with this Court pursuant to Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, asking for the annulment of an arbitration award dated February 3, 2017, issued by the West Bengal State Micro Small Enterprises Facilitation Council ('WBSMSEFC' or 'Council'), in favor The award holder has petitioned this Court for the execution of the aforementioned arbitral award by filing an execution application (EC 330/2017) in accordance with Section 36 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996. The parties have filed many interlocutory applications in both cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN INDIA: CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS AND IMPLICATIONS ON MODERN ISSUES JUDICIAL REVIEW: EXPLORING THE ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATIONS DUE PROCESS: EVALUATING ITS APPLICATION IN CRIMINAL AND CIVIL PROCEEDINGS FUTURE OF BLOCKCHAIN GOVERNANCE: EXPLORING DECENTRALIZED DEMOCRACY DATA PROTECTION AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: THE INTERSECTION OF PRIVACY AND INFORMATION SECURITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1