分析及影响

J. Entwistle, Filippo Cavassini
{"title":"分析及影响","authors":"J. Entwistle, Filippo Cavassini","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvcj2vv6.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Country ownership is widely seen as crucial to the success of national development strategies, but a robust operational framework to assess it has been elusive. The Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRS) initiative underpinned by the Comprehensive Development Framework (CDF) principles, introduced in 1999, take the question of country ownership to a new level by ensuring an opportunity for a country to take the initiative in defining its own strategy, and take charge of its development. This study offers a common operational approach to assessing country ownership of PRSs. It builds on the findings of the Bank's 2003 CDF Progress Report, which reviewed experience in 48 countries, on PRS reviews prepared by other organizations, and other units within the Bank, and on detailed case studies of the PRS process carried out for the purposes of this study in four countries that have made strong progress in developing nationally, owned development strategies: Bolivia, Ghana, the Kyrgyz Republic, and Senegal. Experience in the case study countries shows that to develop country ownership of PRSs, it is essential to integrate PRS formulation, and implementation into a country's broader decision making processes and systems. The indicators point to increasing institutionalization of the PRS process: to the extent that these elements are in place, country ownership of the PRS is stronger. However, all indicators are unlikely to be equally important in all countries. Countries with weaker governance and institutions like Low-Income Countries Under Stress (LICUS) face considerable challenges in fostering country ownership of the PRS, and are likely to make slower progress than those with stronger institutions.","PeriodicalId":388861,"journal":{"name":"Menachem Begin and the Israel-Egypt Peace Process","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"59","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis and Implications\",\"authors\":\"J. Entwistle, Filippo Cavassini\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctvcj2vv6.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Country ownership is widely seen as crucial to the success of national development strategies, but a robust operational framework to assess it has been elusive. The Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRS) initiative underpinned by the Comprehensive Development Framework (CDF) principles, introduced in 1999, take the question of country ownership to a new level by ensuring an opportunity for a country to take the initiative in defining its own strategy, and take charge of its development. This study offers a common operational approach to assessing country ownership of PRSs. It builds on the findings of the Bank's 2003 CDF Progress Report, which reviewed experience in 48 countries, on PRS reviews prepared by other organizations, and other units within the Bank, and on detailed case studies of the PRS process carried out for the purposes of this study in four countries that have made strong progress in developing nationally, owned development strategies: Bolivia, Ghana, the Kyrgyz Republic, and Senegal. Experience in the case study countries shows that to develop country ownership of PRSs, it is essential to integrate PRS formulation, and implementation into a country's broader decision making processes and systems. The indicators point to increasing institutionalization of the PRS process: to the extent that these elements are in place, country ownership of the PRS is stronger. However, all indicators are unlikely to be equally important in all countries. Countries with weaker governance and institutions like Low-Income Countries Under Stress (LICUS) face considerable challenges in fostering country ownership of the PRS, and are likely to make slower progress than those with stronger institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Menachem Begin and the Israel-Egypt Peace Process\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"59\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Menachem Begin and the Israel-Egypt Peace Process\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcj2vv6.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Menachem Begin and the Israel-Egypt Peace Process","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcj2vv6.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

摘要

人们普遍认为,国家所有权对国家发展战略的成功至关重要,但一直没有一个强有力的业务框架来评估国家所有权。1999年推出的以全面发展框架(CDF)原则为基础的减贫战略(PRS)倡议,通过确保各国有机会主动制定自己的战略并负责自己的发展,将国家所有权问题提升到一个新的水平。这项研究为评估国家对减贫战略的所有权提供了一种共同的操作方法。该报告以世行2003年《可持续发展基金进展报告》的结论为基础,该报告审查了48个国家的经验,参考了世行其他组织和其他部门编写的减贫战略审查报告,以及为本研究目的在玻利维亚、加纳、吉尔吉斯共和国和塞内加尔这四个在制定自主发展战略方面取得重大进展的国家开展的减贫进程详细案例研究。案例研究国家的经验表明,为了发展国家对减贫战略的所有权,必须将减贫战略的制定和实施纳入一个国家更广泛的决策过程和系统。各项指标表明减贫战略进程日益制度化:只要这些要素到位,国家对减贫战略的自主权就更强。然而,所有指标不可能在所有国家都同样重要。治理较弱的国家和机构(如压力下的低收入国家)在促进国家拥有减贫战略方面面临相当大的挑战,并且可能比那些机构较强的国家取得更慢的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis and Implications
Country ownership is widely seen as crucial to the success of national development strategies, but a robust operational framework to assess it has been elusive. The Poverty Reduction Strategy (PRS) initiative underpinned by the Comprehensive Development Framework (CDF) principles, introduced in 1999, take the question of country ownership to a new level by ensuring an opportunity for a country to take the initiative in defining its own strategy, and take charge of its development. This study offers a common operational approach to assessing country ownership of PRSs. It builds on the findings of the Bank's 2003 CDF Progress Report, which reviewed experience in 48 countries, on PRS reviews prepared by other organizations, and other units within the Bank, and on detailed case studies of the PRS process carried out for the purposes of this study in four countries that have made strong progress in developing nationally, owned development strategies: Bolivia, Ghana, the Kyrgyz Republic, and Senegal. Experience in the case study countries shows that to develop country ownership of PRSs, it is essential to integrate PRS formulation, and implementation into a country's broader decision making processes and systems. The indicators point to increasing institutionalization of the PRS process: to the extent that these elements are in place, country ownership of the PRS is stronger. However, all indicators are unlikely to be equally important in all countries. Countries with weaker governance and institutions like Low-Income Countries Under Stress (LICUS) face considerable challenges in fostering country ownership of the PRS, and are likely to make slower progress than those with stronger institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Domestic Political Struggle over the Camp David Accords: Camp David—Between Psychology and Political Realism: Acknowledgments Return to Opposition: From Jerusalem to Camp David:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1