检视大学辅导与学生产出的关系:NACADA期刊内容分析

A. R. Alvarado, Avery Olson
{"title":"检视大学辅导与学生产出的关系:NACADA期刊内容分析","authors":"A. R. Alvarado, Avery Olson","doi":"10.12930/nacada-19-33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an effort to promote the advancement of the advising profession, this study examines trends related to current knowledge of academic advising and the relationships between various forms of postsecondary advising practices and student outputs. Using content analysis techniques, we analyzed research articles published in NACADA Journal between 2004 and 2018 to identify trends in the ways academic advising has been studied. Major findings include the small number of studies (n = 18) over a 15-year period that relate advising to outputs and the lack of research focusing on underrepresented student populations despite the continued significant growth of these diverse groups. Recommendations highlight characteristics of academic advising that may benefit from further scholarly inquiry.","PeriodicalId":158925,"journal":{"name":"NACADA Journal","volume":"310 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Relationship Between College Advising and Student Outputs: A Content Analysis of the NACADA Journal\",\"authors\":\"A. R. Alvarado, Avery Olson\",\"doi\":\"10.12930/nacada-19-33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In an effort to promote the advancement of the advising profession, this study examines trends related to current knowledge of academic advising and the relationships between various forms of postsecondary advising practices and student outputs. Using content analysis techniques, we analyzed research articles published in NACADA Journal between 2004 and 2018 to identify trends in the ways academic advising has been studied. Major findings include the small number of studies (n = 18) over a 15-year period that relate advising to outputs and the lack of research focusing on underrepresented student populations despite the continued significant growth of these diverse groups. Recommendations highlight characteristics of academic advising that may benefit from further scholarly inquiry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NACADA Journal\",\"volume\":\"310 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NACADA Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12930/nacada-19-33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NACADA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12930/nacada-19-33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

为了促进咨询行业的发展,本研究考察了与当前学术咨询知识相关的趋势,以及各种形式的高等教育咨询实践与学生产出之间的关系。利用内容分析技术,我们分析了2004年至2018年间发表在NACADA期刊上的研究文章,以确定学术咨询研究方式的趋势。主要发现包括15年期间的少量研究(n = 18)涉及对产出的建议,以及缺乏关注代表性不足的学生群体的研究,尽管这些不同群体的人数持续显著增长。建议强调学术建议的特点,可以从进一步的学术调查中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining the Relationship Between College Advising and Student Outputs: A Content Analysis of the NACADA Journal
In an effort to promote the advancement of the advising profession, this study examines trends related to current knowledge of academic advising and the relationships between various forms of postsecondary advising practices and student outputs. Using content analysis techniques, we analyzed research articles published in NACADA Journal between 2004 and 2018 to identify trends in the ways academic advising has been studied. Major findings include the small number of studies (n = 18) over a 15-year period that relate advising to outputs and the lack of research focusing on underrepresented student populations despite the continued significant growth of these diverse groups. Recommendations highlight characteristics of academic advising that may benefit from further scholarly inquiry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tensions: A Grounded Theory of Ethical Practice Understanding the Career Management of Female Primary-Role Advisors Messaging Matters: The Impact of Advising Micromessages on Student Affect and Behavior across Diverse University Campuses Attitudes about Cybersecurity Articulation Agreements and Transfer Students: A Statewide Survey of Faculty Members and Advisors Online Graduate Career Changers: Motivations and Use of Academic and Career Advising Services and Resources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1