厄瓜多尔为自然而保护自然权利的成果

G. Rivas, K. Swing, Esteban Suárez, A. Encalada, Alexander Hearn, Luis Sempértegui, Stella de la Torre, Jaime Chaves
{"title":"厄瓜多尔为自然而保护自然权利的成果","authors":"G. Rivas, K. Swing, Esteban Suárez, A. Encalada, Alexander Hearn, Luis Sempértegui, Stella de la Torre, Jaime Chaves","doi":"10.21926/aeer.2203035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rights of nature have been widely discussed at a philosophical level for a long time, but examples of its practical application are quite rare. Ecuador is the first country to incorporate this concept into its constitutional foundation and put the theory into practice. However, implementing entirely justifiable rights of nature is hindered by factors, such as economic considerations, legal interpretations, cultural norms, political will, and disproportionate perspectives of “the greater good”. After getting opportunities for more than a decade to convert theoretical concepts into tangible results for nature, many doubts remain concerning the applied practicality of this ideology.","PeriodicalId":198785,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Environmental and Engineering Research","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Ecuador’s Rights of Nature for Nature’s Sake\",\"authors\":\"G. Rivas, K. Swing, Esteban Suárez, A. Encalada, Alexander Hearn, Luis Sempértegui, Stella de la Torre, Jaime Chaves\",\"doi\":\"10.21926/aeer.2203035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rights of nature have been widely discussed at a philosophical level for a long time, but examples of its practical application are quite rare. Ecuador is the first country to incorporate this concept into its constitutional foundation and put the theory into practice. However, implementing entirely justifiable rights of nature is hindered by factors, such as economic considerations, legal interpretations, cultural norms, political will, and disproportionate perspectives of “the greater good”. After getting opportunities for more than a decade to convert theoretical concepts into tangible results for nature, many doubts remain concerning the applied practicality of this ideology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Environmental and Engineering Research\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Environmental and Engineering Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21926/aeer.2203035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Environmental and Engineering Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21926/aeer.2203035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,自然权利在哲学层面上被广泛讨论,但其实际应用的例子却很少。厄瓜多尔是第一个将这一理念纳入宪法基础并付诸实践的国家。然而,实施完全合理的自然权利受到各种因素的阻碍,例如经济考虑、法律解释、文化规范、政治意愿和不成比例的“更大利益”观点。十多年来,人们一直有机会将理论概念转化为实际的自然成果,但关于这一思想的应用实用性,仍然存在许多疑问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes of Ecuador’s Rights of Nature for Nature’s Sake
The rights of nature have been widely discussed at a philosophical level for a long time, but examples of its practical application are quite rare. Ecuador is the first country to incorporate this concept into its constitutional foundation and put the theory into practice. However, implementing entirely justifiable rights of nature is hindered by factors, such as economic considerations, legal interpretations, cultural norms, political will, and disproportionate perspectives of “the greater good”. After getting opportunities for more than a decade to convert theoretical concepts into tangible results for nature, many doubts remain concerning the applied practicality of this ideology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cultural Eutrophication Impacts on New River in Northern Belize: A Community Capitals Assessment Phytoremediation: A Sustainable Approach to Combat Soil Salinity Human Health Impact of Municipal Solid Waste Mismanagement: A Review Application of Simulation-Based Metrics to Improve the Daylight Performance of a Secondary School, An Approach for Green Building Designers and Architects Estimating Inhaled Nitrogen Dioxide from the Human Biometric Response
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1