产品责任和产品安全:现在和未来

C. Amato
{"title":"产品责任和产品安全:现在和未来","authors":"C. Amato","doi":"10.5771/9783845294797-77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to Art 6 para 1 Directive 1985/374/EC (‘PLD’), an unsafe product is a defective product that may result into producer’s liability. In the European legislator’s intent, Art 6 seems to implement the following syllogism: defect is an objective notion that refers to safety, not to utility;1 the identification and qualification of the properties of a product depend on what the public at large expects. Consequently, it is up to the courts to determine the legitimate safety expectations of the public at large. The le‐ gitimate expectations of a person concerning safety represent an objective standard, assessed on the public’s expectations but not on the injured. It is, therefore, a normative standard, not a factual one.2 The nobile officium of I.","PeriodicalId":273775,"journal":{"name":"Liability for Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Things","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Product Liability and Product Security: Present and Future\",\"authors\":\"C. Amato\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/9783845294797-77\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to Art 6 para 1 Directive 1985/374/EC (‘PLD’), an unsafe product is a defective product that may result into producer’s liability. In the European legislator’s intent, Art 6 seems to implement the following syllogism: defect is an objective notion that refers to safety, not to utility;1 the identification and qualification of the properties of a product depend on what the public at large expects. Consequently, it is up to the courts to determine the legitimate safety expectations of the public at large. The le‐ gitimate expectations of a person concerning safety represent an objective standard, assessed on the public’s expectations but not on the injured. It is, therefore, a normative standard, not a factual one.2 The nobile officium of I.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liability for Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Things\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liability for Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Things\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845294797-77\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liability for Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Things","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845294797-77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

根据1985/374/EC指令(PLD)第6条第1款,不安全产品是可能导致生产商责任的缺陷产品。在欧洲立法者的意图中,第6条似乎实施了以下三段论:缺陷是一个涉及安全性的客观概念,而不是效用;1产品特性的识别和鉴定取决于公众的普遍期望。因此,由法院来决定公众对安全的合理期望。一个人对安全的合法期望是一种客观的标准,是根据公众的期望而不是根据伤者的期望来评估的。因此,它是一种规范性标准,而不是事实标准我的贵族官场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Product Liability and Product Security: Present and Future
According to Art 6 para 1 Directive 1985/374/EC (‘PLD’), an unsafe product is a defective product that may result into producer’s liability. In the European legislator’s intent, Art 6 seems to implement the following syllogism: defect is an objective notion that refers to safety, not to utility;1 the identification and qualification of the properties of a product depend on what the public at large expects. Consequently, it is up to the courts to determine the legitimate safety expectations of the public at large. The le‐ gitimate expectations of a person concerning safety represent an objective standard, assessed on the public’s expectations but not on the injured. It is, therefore, a normative standard, not a factual one.2 The nobile officium of I.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Liability for Autonomous Systems: Tackling Specific Risks of Modern IT Causation and Scope of Liability in the Internet of Things (IoT) Contributors Product Liability 2.0 – Mere Update or New Version? How can Artificial Intelligence be Defective?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1