{"title":"基于dct的隐写方法的图形比较研究","authors":"Koksheik Wong, K. Tanaka, Xiaojun Qi","doi":"10.1109/ISPACS.2006.364783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a graphical comparative study of steganographic methods in the DCT domain. This graphical representation allows at-one-glance comparison among steganographic methods, showing the relative performance of each method with respect to the ideal methods for the metrics considered. Six representative DCT-based steganographic methods are selected and fairly compared in terms of six significant evaluation criteria. From the comparison results, we found some trends in recent evolution of steganographic methods and possible future development directions.","PeriodicalId":178644,"journal":{"name":"2006 International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communications","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Graphical Comparative Study on DCT-based Steganographic Methods\",\"authors\":\"Koksheik Wong, K. Tanaka, Xiaojun Qi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISPACS.2006.364783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a graphical comparative study of steganographic methods in the DCT domain. This graphical representation allows at-one-glance comparison among steganographic methods, showing the relative performance of each method with respect to the ideal methods for the metrics considered. Six representative DCT-based steganographic methods are selected and fairly compared in terms of six significant evaluation criteria. From the comparison results, we found some trends in recent evolution of steganographic methods and possible future development directions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communications\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPACS.2006.364783\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPACS.2006.364783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Graphical Comparative Study on DCT-based Steganographic Methods
This paper presents a graphical comparative study of steganographic methods in the DCT domain. This graphical representation allows at-one-glance comparison among steganographic methods, showing the relative performance of each method with respect to the ideal methods for the metrics considered. Six representative DCT-based steganographic methods are selected and fairly compared in terms of six significant evaluation criteria. From the comparison results, we found some trends in recent evolution of steganographic methods and possible future development directions.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
