目击证人对助理证人

I. Anane
{"title":"目击证人对助理证人","authors":"I. Anane","doi":"10.47577/10.1234/arsaequi.12.1.219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the current legislation in Romania, the witness is a procedural subject. The criminal procedural law in Romania does not distinguish between the eyewitness and the assistant witness, in the Code of Criminal Procedure only the quality of the witness is debated. Instead, the legislation in force also debates the notions of threatened witness, protected witness and vulnerable witness. Although there is no legislative delimitation between the notions of eyewitness and assistant witness, in specialized literature and in judicial practice the two notions are very good. In the legislation in force, as a rule, for the notion of assistant witness, the phrase present person is used and for the eye witness, the phrase witness, although the procedure of hearing and taking the oath is the same in both cases.","PeriodicalId":410800,"journal":{"name":"Ars Aequi","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eyewitnesses versus assistant witnesses\",\"authors\":\"I. Anane\",\"doi\":\"10.47577/10.1234/arsaequi.12.1.219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to the current legislation in Romania, the witness is a procedural subject. The criminal procedural law in Romania does not distinguish between the eyewitness and the assistant witness, in the Code of Criminal Procedure only the quality of the witness is debated. Instead, the legislation in force also debates the notions of threatened witness, protected witness and vulnerable witness. Although there is no legislative delimitation between the notions of eyewitness and assistant witness, in specialized literature and in judicial practice the two notions are very good. In the legislation in force, as a rule, for the notion of assistant witness, the phrase present person is used and for the eye witness, the phrase witness, although the procedure of hearing and taking the oath is the same in both cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":410800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ars Aequi\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ars Aequi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47577/10.1234/arsaequi.12.1.219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ars Aequi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47577/10.1234/arsaequi.12.1.219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据罗马尼亚现行立法,证人是一个程序性主体。罗马尼亚的刑事诉讼法没有区分目击证人和辅助证人,《刑事诉讼法》只对证人的素质进行了辩论。相反,现行立法还对受威胁证人、受保护证人和脆弱证人的概念进行了辩论。证人与辅助证人的概念虽然在立法上没有明确的界限,但在专业文献和司法实践中,这两个概念都是很好的。在现行立法中,通常对辅助证人的概念使用“在场人”一词,对目击证人使用“证人”一词,尽管在这两种情况下,听证和宣誓的程序是相同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Eyewitnesses versus assistant witnesses
According to the current legislation in Romania, the witness is a procedural subject. The criminal procedural law in Romania does not distinguish between the eyewitness and the assistant witness, in the Code of Criminal Procedure only the quality of the witness is debated. Instead, the legislation in force also debates the notions of threatened witness, protected witness and vulnerable witness. Although there is no legislative delimitation between the notions of eyewitness and assistant witness, in specialized literature and in judicial practice the two notions are very good. In the legislation in force, as a rule, for the notion of assistant witness, the phrase present person is used and for the eye witness, the phrase witness, although the procedure of hearing and taking the oath is the same in both cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Field investigation tactical rules Some Theoretical and Practical Aspects Concerning the Fiduciary Property in the Civil Code of Romania Institutional communication models and strategies adapted to New Media Considerations regarding legal liability in the matter of insolvency Protection of the rights of the consumer of medical services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1