不可能,美国!:与古巴缺乏遣返协议及其对美国移民政策的影响

Annasofia A. Roig
{"title":"不可能,美国!:与古巴缺乏遣返协议及其对美国移民政策的影响","authors":"Annasofia A. Roig","doi":"10.25148/LAWREV.13.4.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cuba and the United States have had a tumultuous relationship for over five decades now. Since the Revolution in Cuba, Cuban citizens have been immigrating to the United States in large numbers, including through two Cuban government-sponsored mass exoduses in 1980 and 1994. Throughout that time, the Cuban government refused to negotiate with the United States for the return of its citizens. Because of the lack of diplomatic relations, the two nations did not have a repatriation agreement in place and no agreedupon mechanism existed by which the United States could return Cuban citizens to the island nation. As such, the United States was left with no alternative but to implement the wet foot-dry foot policy in 1995. Following the reestablishment of relations between Cuba and the United States, President Obama repealed wet foot-dry foot as a condition of the newlyestablished repatriation agreement. Finally, Cuba agreed to take back its citizens who either attempted to enter the United States illegally or were deportable from the United States for some other reason. After his election in 2016, President Trump took a harsh stance on Cuban policy and reversed some of President Obama’s changes. This led to a strong response from the Cuban government and created an uncertain future for the newly-established repatriation agreement.","PeriodicalId":300333,"journal":{"name":"FIU Law Review","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No Way, Usa!: The Lack of a Repatriation Agreement with Cuba and Its Effects on U.S. Immigration Policies\",\"authors\":\"Annasofia A. Roig\",\"doi\":\"10.25148/LAWREV.13.4.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cuba and the United States have had a tumultuous relationship for over five decades now. Since the Revolution in Cuba, Cuban citizens have been immigrating to the United States in large numbers, including through two Cuban government-sponsored mass exoduses in 1980 and 1994. Throughout that time, the Cuban government refused to negotiate with the United States for the return of its citizens. Because of the lack of diplomatic relations, the two nations did not have a repatriation agreement in place and no agreedupon mechanism existed by which the United States could return Cuban citizens to the island nation. As such, the United States was left with no alternative but to implement the wet foot-dry foot policy in 1995. Following the reestablishment of relations between Cuba and the United States, President Obama repealed wet foot-dry foot as a condition of the newlyestablished repatriation agreement. Finally, Cuba agreed to take back its citizens who either attempted to enter the United States illegally or were deportable from the United States for some other reason. After his election in 2016, President Trump took a harsh stance on Cuban policy and reversed some of President Obama’s changes. This led to a strong response from the Cuban government and created an uncertain future for the newly-established repatriation agreement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FIU Law Review\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FIU Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25148/LAWREV.13.4.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FIU Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25148/LAWREV.13.4.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

古巴和美国的关系已经动荡了50多年。自古巴革命以来,古巴公民大量移民到美国,包括1980年和1994年两次古巴政府支持的大规模移民。在此期间,古巴政府拒绝与美国就其公民的返回进行谈判。由于缺乏外交关系,两国没有制定遣返协议,也没有就美国可以将古巴公民送回这个岛国的机制达成一致。因此,美国别无选择,只能在1995年实施“湿脚干脚”政策。随着古巴和美国关系的重建,奥巴马总统废除了将“干脚湿脚”作为新建立的遣返协议的条件。最后,古巴同意收回试图非法进入美国或因其他原因被驱逐出美国的古巴公民。2016年当选后,特朗普总统对古巴政策采取了强硬立场,并推翻了奥巴马总统的一些改革。这引起了古巴政府的强烈反应,并为新建立的遣返协议创造了不确定的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
No Way, Usa!: The Lack of a Repatriation Agreement with Cuba and Its Effects on U.S. Immigration Policies
Cuba and the United States have had a tumultuous relationship for over five decades now. Since the Revolution in Cuba, Cuban citizens have been immigrating to the United States in large numbers, including through two Cuban government-sponsored mass exoduses in 1980 and 1994. Throughout that time, the Cuban government refused to negotiate with the United States for the return of its citizens. Because of the lack of diplomatic relations, the two nations did not have a repatriation agreement in place and no agreedupon mechanism existed by which the United States could return Cuban citizens to the island nation. As such, the United States was left with no alternative but to implement the wet foot-dry foot policy in 1995. Following the reestablishment of relations between Cuba and the United States, President Obama repealed wet foot-dry foot as a condition of the newlyestablished repatriation agreement. Finally, Cuba agreed to take back its citizens who either attempted to enter the United States illegally or were deportable from the United States for some other reason. After his election in 2016, President Trump took a harsh stance on Cuban policy and reversed some of President Obama’s changes. This led to a strong response from the Cuban government and created an uncertain future for the newly-established repatriation agreement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Against Imperial Arbitrators: The Brilliance of Canada's New Model Investment Treaty "COVID-19 Was the Publicist for Homeschooling" and States Need to Finally Take Homeschooling Regulations Seriously Post-Pandemic Second Annual Report to The Editor-In-Chief Gender Inequality in Contracts Casebooks: Representations of Women in the Contracts Curriculum You'll Grow Into It: How Federal and State Courts Have Erred in Excluding Persons Under Twenty-One from 'the people' Protected by the Second Amendment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1