主动光学植物冠层传感器中两种测距方法的比较

M. Schaefer, D. Lamb, Ronald C. Bradbury
{"title":"主动光学植物冠层传感器中两种测距方法的比较","authors":"M. Schaefer, D. Lamb, Ronald C. Bradbury","doi":"10.1109/SAS.2014.6798956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Active optical sensors that contain their own modulated light sources are becoming popular for “sensing” photosynthetically-active biomass in crops and pastures. These sensors detect optical reflectance to derive spectral vegetation indices, such as the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI), and are subsequently calibrated to measure plant parameters e.g. biomass. However, research has demonstrated the accuracy of the derived measurements can often be improved by including both a spectral index and a corresponding measure of plant height. This paper describes an active, optical sensor that integrates modulated reflectance sensing with the ability to measure (range) the distance between the source and a target surface. Two ranging techniques are evaluated; one based on the inverse square law (ISL) of reflected radiation and another based on a position-sensitive detector (PSD). Both ranging methods proved capable of reliably delineating target distances out to 4.0 m from the source. Over this range, the PSD detector exhibited a distance-invariant RMSE of ± 2.6 cm whilst the ISL method exhibited an almost linear increase in error of ± 25 % of the measured distance to a spectralon target. Application to a vegetative target (Kikuyu grass), demonstrated the ISL ranging method to yield an average RMSE of ± 3.0 cm in the range of 0.60-1.40 m, while the average RMSE of the PSD over a range of 0.50-1.10 m was observed to be ± 10.0 cm. Despite superior accuracy, target reflectance variations may prove problematic in the use of a PSD ranging sensor and requires further investigation.","PeriodicalId":125872,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of two ranging approaches in an active, optical plant canopy sensor\",\"authors\":\"M. Schaefer, D. Lamb, Ronald C. Bradbury\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SAS.2014.6798956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Active optical sensors that contain their own modulated light sources are becoming popular for “sensing” photosynthetically-active biomass in crops and pastures. These sensors detect optical reflectance to derive spectral vegetation indices, such as the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI), and are subsequently calibrated to measure plant parameters e.g. biomass. However, research has demonstrated the accuracy of the derived measurements can often be improved by including both a spectral index and a corresponding measure of plant height. This paper describes an active, optical sensor that integrates modulated reflectance sensing with the ability to measure (range) the distance between the source and a target surface. Two ranging techniques are evaluated; one based on the inverse square law (ISL) of reflected radiation and another based on a position-sensitive detector (PSD). Both ranging methods proved capable of reliably delineating target distances out to 4.0 m from the source. Over this range, the PSD detector exhibited a distance-invariant RMSE of ± 2.6 cm whilst the ISL method exhibited an almost linear increase in error of ± 25 % of the measured distance to a spectralon target. Application to a vegetative target (Kikuyu grass), demonstrated the ISL ranging method to yield an average RMSE of ± 3.0 cm in the range of 0.60-1.40 m, while the average RMSE of the PSD over a range of 0.50-1.10 m was observed to be ± 10.0 cm. Despite superior accuracy, target reflectance variations may prove problematic in the use of a PSD ranging sensor and requires further investigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":125872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SAS.2014.6798956\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SAS.2014.6798956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

含有自身调制光源的主动光学传感器在“感知”作物和牧场的光合活性生物量方面正变得越来越流行。这些传感器检测光学反射率,从而得出光谱植被指数,如归一化植被指数(NDVI),并随后进行校准以测量植物参数,如生物量。然而,研究表明,通常可以通过同时包括光谱指数和相应的植物高度测量来提高衍生测量的准确性。本文描述了一种有源光学传感器,它集成了调制反射传感和测量源和目标表面之间距离的能力。评估了两种测距技术;一种基于反射辐射的平方反比定律(ISL),另一种基于位置敏感探测器(PSD)。事实证明,这两种测距方法都能够可靠地描绘出距离震源4.0米以内的目标距离。在此范围内,PSD检测器显示出距离不变的RMSE为±2.6 cm,而ISL方法显示出与光谱目标测量距离的误差几乎线性增加±25%。应用于植物目标(基库尤草),证明了ISL测距方法在0.60-1.40 m范围内的平均RMSE为±3.0 cm,而PSD在0.50-1.10 m范围内的平均RMSE为±10.0 cm。尽管精度高,但目标反射率变化在PSD测距传感器的使用中可能会出现问题,需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of two ranging approaches in an active, optical plant canopy sensor
Active optical sensors that contain their own modulated light sources are becoming popular for “sensing” photosynthetically-active biomass in crops and pastures. These sensors detect optical reflectance to derive spectral vegetation indices, such as the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI), and are subsequently calibrated to measure plant parameters e.g. biomass. However, research has demonstrated the accuracy of the derived measurements can often be improved by including both a spectral index and a corresponding measure of plant height. This paper describes an active, optical sensor that integrates modulated reflectance sensing with the ability to measure (range) the distance between the source and a target surface. Two ranging techniques are evaluated; one based on the inverse square law (ISL) of reflected radiation and another based on a position-sensitive detector (PSD). Both ranging methods proved capable of reliably delineating target distances out to 4.0 m from the source. Over this range, the PSD detector exhibited a distance-invariant RMSE of ± 2.6 cm whilst the ISL method exhibited an almost linear increase in error of ± 25 % of the measured distance to a spectralon target. Application to a vegetative target (Kikuyu grass), demonstrated the ISL ranging method to yield an average RMSE of ± 3.0 cm in the range of 0.60-1.40 m, while the average RMSE of the PSD over a range of 0.50-1.10 m was observed to be ± 10.0 cm. Despite superior accuracy, target reflectance variations may prove problematic in the use of a PSD ranging sensor and requires further investigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Low-power wireless interface for handheld smart metering devices PointsBug versus TangentBug algorithm, a performance comparison in unknown static environment RFID coordinate registration for agricultural process sensing Standard Uncertainty estimation on polynomial regression models Design and simulation of a Micro Hotplate for MEMS based integrated gas sensing system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1