GTP-U和SRv6无状态翻译的性能评价

Chunghan Lee, Kentaro Ebisawa, H. Kuwata, M. Kohno, S. Matsushima
{"title":"GTP-U和SRv6无状态翻译的性能评价","authors":"Chunghan Lee, Kentaro Ebisawa, H. Kuwata, M. Kohno, S. Matsushima","doi":"10.23919/CNSM46954.2019.9012725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The GPRS Tunneling Protocol User Plane (GTP-U) has long been deployed for GSM, UMTS and 4G LTE. Now for 5G, IPv6 Segment Routing (SRv6) has been proposed as an alternative user plane protocol to GTP-U in both 3GPP and IETF. SRv6 based on source routing has many advantages: stateless traffic steering, network programming and so on. Despite the advantages, it is hard to expect to replace GTP-U by SRv6 all at once, even in a 5G deployment because of a lot of dependencies between 3GPP nodes. Therefore, stateless translation and coexistence with GTP-U have been proposed in IETF. However there are no suitable measurement platform and performance evaluation results between GTP-U and SRv6. In particular, it is hard to measure latency on commercial traffic generators when a receiving packet type is different from a sending packet type. In this paper, we focus on the performance evaluation between GTP-U and SRv6 stateless translation. We designed an SRv6 measurement platform using a programmable switch, and measured GTP-U and SRv6 functions with pre-defined scenarios on a local environment. Well-known performance metrics, such as throughput and packets per second (PPS), are measured by the traffic generator while the latency at the functions was measured using telemetry on our SRv6 platform. In our evaluation, we cannot find the abrupt performance drop of well-known metrics at SRv6 stateless translation. Moreover, the latency of SRv6 stateless translation is similar to GTP-U and their performance degradation is negligible. Through the evaluation results, it is obvious that the SRv6 stateless translation is acceptable to the 5G user plane.","PeriodicalId":273818,"journal":{"name":"2019 15th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Evaluation of GTP-U and SRv6 Stateless Translation\",\"authors\":\"Chunghan Lee, Kentaro Ebisawa, H. Kuwata, M. Kohno, S. Matsushima\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/CNSM46954.2019.9012725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The GPRS Tunneling Protocol User Plane (GTP-U) has long been deployed for GSM, UMTS and 4G LTE. Now for 5G, IPv6 Segment Routing (SRv6) has been proposed as an alternative user plane protocol to GTP-U in both 3GPP and IETF. SRv6 based on source routing has many advantages: stateless traffic steering, network programming and so on. Despite the advantages, it is hard to expect to replace GTP-U by SRv6 all at once, even in a 5G deployment because of a lot of dependencies between 3GPP nodes. Therefore, stateless translation and coexistence with GTP-U have been proposed in IETF. However there are no suitable measurement platform and performance evaluation results between GTP-U and SRv6. In particular, it is hard to measure latency on commercial traffic generators when a receiving packet type is different from a sending packet type. In this paper, we focus on the performance evaluation between GTP-U and SRv6 stateless translation. We designed an SRv6 measurement platform using a programmable switch, and measured GTP-U and SRv6 functions with pre-defined scenarios on a local environment. Well-known performance metrics, such as throughput and packets per second (PPS), are measured by the traffic generator while the latency at the functions was measured using telemetry on our SRv6 platform. In our evaluation, we cannot find the abrupt performance drop of well-known metrics at SRv6 stateless translation. Moreover, the latency of SRv6 stateless translation is similar to GTP-U and their performance degradation is negligible. Through the evaluation results, it is obvious that the SRv6 stateless translation is acceptable to the 5G user plane.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 15th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM)\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 15th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/CNSM46954.2019.9012725\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 15th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/CNSM46954.2019.9012725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

GPRS隧道协议用户平面(GTP-U)在GSM、UMTS和4G LTE中早已部署。现在对于5G, IPv6段路由(SRv6)已被提议作为3GPP和IETF中GTP-U的替代用户平面协议。基于源路由的SRv6具有无状态流量引导、网络编程等优点。尽管有这些优势,但即使在5G部署中,由于3GPP节点之间存在大量依赖关系,也很难期望一次性用SRv6取代GTP-U。因此,在IETF中提出了无状态翻译和与GTP-U共存。然而,GTP-U与SRv6之间没有合适的测量平台和性能评价结果。特别是,当接收数据包类型与发送数据包类型不同时,很难测量商业流量生成器的延迟。本文主要研究了GTP-U和SRv6无状态翻译之间的性能评价。我们设计了一个使用可编程开关的SRv6测量平台,并在本地环境中使用预定义的场景测量了GTP-U和SRv6功能。众所周知的性能指标,如吞吐量和每秒包数(PPS),是由流量生成器测量的,而函数的延迟是使用我们的SRv6平台上的遥测技术测量的。在我们的评估中,我们没有发现SRv6无状态翻译中众所周知的指标的性能突然下降。此外,SRv6无状态转换的延迟与GTP-U相似,性能下降可以忽略不计。通过评估结果可以明显看出,SRv6无状态转换在5G用户平面上是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance Evaluation of GTP-U and SRv6 Stateless Translation
The GPRS Tunneling Protocol User Plane (GTP-U) has long been deployed for GSM, UMTS and 4G LTE. Now for 5G, IPv6 Segment Routing (SRv6) has been proposed as an alternative user plane protocol to GTP-U in both 3GPP and IETF. SRv6 based on source routing has many advantages: stateless traffic steering, network programming and so on. Despite the advantages, it is hard to expect to replace GTP-U by SRv6 all at once, even in a 5G deployment because of a lot of dependencies between 3GPP nodes. Therefore, stateless translation and coexistence with GTP-U have been proposed in IETF. However there are no suitable measurement platform and performance evaluation results between GTP-U and SRv6. In particular, it is hard to measure latency on commercial traffic generators when a receiving packet type is different from a sending packet type. In this paper, we focus on the performance evaluation between GTP-U and SRv6 stateless translation. We designed an SRv6 measurement platform using a programmable switch, and measured GTP-U and SRv6 functions with pre-defined scenarios on a local environment. Well-known performance metrics, such as throughput and packets per second (PPS), are measured by the traffic generator while the latency at the functions was measured using telemetry on our SRv6 platform. In our evaluation, we cannot find the abrupt performance drop of well-known metrics at SRv6 stateless translation. Moreover, the latency of SRv6 stateless translation is similar to GTP-U and their performance degradation is negligible. Through the evaluation results, it is obvious that the SRv6 stateless translation is acceptable to the 5G user plane.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flow-based Throughput Prediction using Deep Learning and Real-World Network Traffic Learning From Evolving Network Data for Dependable Botnet Detection Exploring NAT Detection and Host Identification Using Machine Learning Lumped Markovian Estimation for Wi-Fi Channel Utilization Prediction An Access Control Implementation Targeting Resource-constrained Environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1