ace抑制剂与生活质量。

H Herlitz
{"title":"ace抑制剂与生活质量。","authors":"H Herlitz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A review of the literature concerning quality of life aspects on ACE-inhibitors in hypertensive patients is given. In the first part of the eighties two prospective multi-center randomised trials were conducted to determine the effect of captopril in comparison to methyldopa or an unselective beta-blocker on the quality of life in patients with mild to moderate hypertension (Hill et al. and Croog et al.). Both studies revealed slight but significant positive effects on indices of quality of life in captopril treated patients compared to those who had methyldopa or an unselective beta-blocker. Later, another ACE-inhibitor, enalapril, has been compared with a selective beta-blocker (Edmonds et al. and Herrick et al.) with respect to side-effects and the quality of life. The measurements of the quality of life tended to favour enalapril, but the differences were small and the over-all tolerability of the two drugs was similar. In conclusion, comparisons with more long standing forms of antihypertensive therapy suggest a slightly more favourable effect of ACE-inhibitors on the quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":77619,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of primary health care. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ACE-inhibitors and quality of life.\",\"authors\":\"H Herlitz\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A review of the literature concerning quality of life aspects on ACE-inhibitors in hypertensive patients is given. In the first part of the eighties two prospective multi-center randomised trials were conducted to determine the effect of captopril in comparison to methyldopa or an unselective beta-blocker on the quality of life in patients with mild to moderate hypertension (Hill et al. and Croog et al.). Both studies revealed slight but significant positive effects on indices of quality of life in captopril treated patients compared to those who had methyldopa or an unselective beta-blocker. Later, another ACE-inhibitor, enalapril, has been compared with a selective beta-blocker (Edmonds et al. and Herrick et al.) with respect to side-effects and the quality of life. The measurements of the quality of life tended to favour enalapril, but the differences were small and the over-all tolerability of the two drugs was similar. In conclusion, comparisons with more long standing forms of antihypertensive therapy suggest a slightly more favourable effect of ACE-inhibitors on the quality of life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian journal of primary health care. Supplement\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian journal of primary health care. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of primary health care. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文综述了高血压患者使用ace抑制剂对生活质量的影响。在20世纪80年代的第一部分,进行了两项前瞻性多中心随机试验,以确定卡托普利与甲基多巴或非选择性β受体阻滞剂相比对轻中度高血压患者生活质量的影响(Hill等人和Croog等人)。两项研究都显示,与服用甲基多巴或非选择性受体阻滞剂的患者相比,卡托普利治疗对患者的生活质量指标有轻微但显著的积极影响。后来,另一种ace抑制剂依那普利与选择性β受体阻滞剂(Edmonds et al. and Herrick et al.)在副作用和生活质量方面进行了比较。生活质量的测量倾向于依那普利,但差异很小,两种药物的总体耐受性相似。总之,与更长期的降压治疗形式相比,ace抑制剂对生活质量的影响略好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ACE-inhibitors and quality of life.

A review of the literature concerning quality of life aspects on ACE-inhibitors in hypertensive patients is given. In the first part of the eighties two prospective multi-center randomised trials were conducted to determine the effect of captopril in comparison to methyldopa or an unselective beta-blocker on the quality of life in patients with mild to moderate hypertension (Hill et al. and Croog et al.). Both studies revealed slight but significant positive effects on indices of quality of life in captopril treated patients compared to those who had methyldopa or an unselective beta-blocker. Later, another ACE-inhibitor, enalapril, has been compared with a selective beta-blocker (Edmonds et al. and Herrick et al.) with respect to side-effects and the quality of life. The measurements of the quality of life tended to favour enalapril, but the differences were small and the over-all tolerability of the two drugs was similar. In conclusion, comparisons with more long standing forms of antihypertensive therapy suggest a slightly more favourable effect of ACE-inhibitors on the quality of life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Central Research Unit of General Practice: a personal review after 22 years. Research in general practice--achievements in the past and possibilities for the future. Poul A. Pedersen--the first among pioneers. Can general practitioners be randomised? Situational disease: elements of a social theory of disease based on a study of back trouble.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1