Nenad Stošić, J. Popović, Marija Andjelkovic-Apostolovic, A. Mitić, Radomir Barac, Marija Nikolić, M. Igić
{"title":"ProTaper Universal和ProTaper Next旋转仪器的抗循环疲劳分析","authors":"Nenad Stošić, J. Popović, Marija Andjelkovic-Apostolovic, A. Mitić, Radomir Barac, Marija Nikolić, M. Igić","doi":"10.2298/sgs2203109s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Root canal preparation is one of the most important active\n phases in the treatment of infected and noninfected teeth. Nickel-titanium\n (NiTi) instruments are increasingly used in endodontic therapy due to their\n superior properties compared to those made of stainless steel. The aim of\n this research was to perform an analysis and comparison of cyclic fatigue in\n ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary NiTi instruments in full\n rotation in simulated canals. Material and methods. Twelve ProTaper Next and\n twelve ProTaper Universal instruments were analyzed in the study. The\n instruments were tested in an artificial canal stuffed in a metal block at\n an angle of 45? and a corner radius of 5 mm. The operating time of each\n instrument until fracture was measured and the number of cycles to fracture\n (NCF) calculated. Results. ProTaper Next instruments showed greater\n resistance to cyclic fatigue compared to ProTaper Universal. The NCF value\n was significantly higher in ProTaper Next (1,296.83?20.2) instruments\n (p<0.001). The average length of fractured fragments was statistically\n significantly higher in ProTaper Universal (4.52?0.33) instruments compared\n to ProTaper Next (3.82?0.27) (p<0.001). Conclusion. It was concluded that\n the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Next instruments was higher\n compared to ProTaper Universal instruments.","PeriodicalId":180624,"journal":{"name":"Serbian Dental Journal","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary instruments\",\"authors\":\"Nenad Stošić, J. Popović, Marija Andjelkovic-Apostolovic, A. Mitić, Radomir Barac, Marija Nikolić, M. Igić\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/sgs2203109s\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Root canal preparation is one of the most important active\\n phases in the treatment of infected and noninfected teeth. Nickel-titanium\\n (NiTi) instruments are increasingly used in endodontic therapy due to their\\n superior properties compared to those made of stainless steel. The aim of\\n this research was to perform an analysis and comparison of cyclic fatigue in\\n ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary NiTi instruments in full\\n rotation in simulated canals. Material and methods. Twelve ProTaper Next and\\n twelve ProTaper Universal instruments were analyzed in the study. The\\n instruments were tested in an artificial canal stuffed in a metal block at\\n an angle of 45? and a corner radius of 5 mm. The operating time of each\\n instrument until fracture was measured and the number of cycles to fracture\\n (NCF) calculated. Results. ProTaper Next instruments showed greater\\n resistance to cyclic fatigue compared to ProTaper Universal. The NCF value\\n was significantly higher in ProTaper Next (1,296.83?20.2) instruments\\n (p<0.001). The average length of fractured fragments was statistically\\n significantly higher in ProTaper Universal (4.52?0.33) instruments compared\\n to ProTaper Next (3.82?0.27) (p<0.001). Conclusion. It was concluded that\\n the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Next instruments was higher\\n compared to ProTaper Universal instruments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":180624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Serbian Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Serbian Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/sgs2203109s\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serbian Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/sgs2203109s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary instruments
Introduction. Root canal preparation is one of the most important active
phases in the treatment of infected and noninfected teeth. Nickel-titanium
(NiTi) instruments are increasingly used in endodontic therapy due to their
superior properties compared to those made of stainless steel. The aim of
this research was to perform an analysis and comparison of cyclic fatigue in
ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary NiTi instruments in full
rotation in simulated canals. Material and methods. Twelve ProTaper Next and
twelve ProTaper Universal instruments were analyzed in the study. The
instruments were tested in an artificial canal stuffed in a metal block at
an angle of 45? and a corner radius of 5 mm. The operating time of each
instrument until fracture was measured and the number of cycles to fracture
(NCF) calculated. Results. ProTaper Next instruments showed greater
resistance to cyclic fatigue compared to ProTaper Universal. The NCF value
was significantly higher in ProTaper Next (1,296.83?20.2) instruments
(p<0.001). The average length of fractured fragments was statistically
significantly higher in ProTaper Universal (4.52?0.33) instruments compared
to ProTaper Next (3.82?0.27) (p<0.001). Conclusion. It was concluded that
the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Next instruments was higher
compared to ProTaper Universal instruments.