因2019冠状病毒病非自然灾害而签订的债务偿还义务暂停协议的重组

H. A. Labibah
{"title":"因2019冠状病毒病非自然灾害而签订的债务偿还义务暂停协议的重组","authors":"H. A. Labibah","doi":"10.30631/alrisalah.v22i1.1229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The quick spread of the Covid-19 pandemic weakened the economy and led to the non-performance of debtors’ obligations because their business did not run smoothly during the period. Several business actors with homologated PKPU peace were hindered or prevented from achieving their aims including the force majeure qualifications associated with the Covid-19 pandemic. Therefore, this normative legal research conducted through statutory, conceptual, and case approaches was used to assess this situation. The findings showed that a debtor can request to restructure the homologation implementation based on the force majeure of the Covid-19 pandemic but the request needs to be based on the agreement between the debtor and creditor using Article 1338 paragraph (1) of the Civil Code as the premise. It was discovered from the PT Berlian Tenker case that the agreement was conducted without requiring further re-homologation in the court because the UUK-PKPU is not applicable in the matter due to the fact that the Covid-19 pandemic is a national disaster classified as a relative force majeure.","PeriodicalId":366373,"journal":{"name":"Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restructuring of Debt Payment Obligation Suspension Agreements Homologated Due to Covid-19 Non-Natural Disasters\",\"authors\":\"H. A. Labibah\",\"doi\":\"10.30631/alrisalah.v22i1.1229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The quick spread of the Covid-19 pandemic weakened the economy and led to the non-performance of debtors’ obligations because their business did not run smoothly during the period. Several business actors with homologated PKPU peace were hindered or prevented from achieving their aims including the force majeure qualifications associated with the Covid-19 pandemic. Therefore, this normative legal research conducted through statutory, conceptual, and case approaches was used to assess this situation. The findings showed that a debtor can request to restructure the homologation implementation based on the force majeure of the Covid-19 pandemic but the request needs to be based on the agreement between the debtor and creditor using Article 1338 paragraph (1) of the Civil Code as the premise. It was discovered from the PT Berlian Tenker case that the agreement was conducted without requiring further re-homologation in the court because the UUK-PKPU is not applicable in the matter due to the fact that the Covid-19 pandemic is a national disaster classified as a relative force majeure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":366373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v22i1.1229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v22i1.1229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新冠肺炎疫情的迅速蔓延削弱了经济,并导致债务人无法履行债务,因为他们的业务在此期间运行不顺利。一些拥有认可的PKPU和平的商业行为者受到阻碍或阻止,无法实现其目标,包括与Covid-19大流行相关的不可抗力资格。因此,通过法定、概念和案例方法进行的规范性法律研究被用来评估这种情况。结果表明,债务人可以以新冠肺炎大流行的不可抗力为由请求重组认可实施,但这一请求需要以《民法典》第1338条第(1)款为前提,以债务人和债权人之间的协议为基础。从PT Berlian Tenker案中发现,由于新冠肺炎疫情属于相对不可抗力的国家灾难,因此不适用英国- pkpu,因此不需要在法院进行进一步的重新认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Restructuring of Debt Payment Obligation Suspension Agreements Homologated Due to Covid-19 Non-Natural Disasters
The quick spread of the Covid-19 pandemic weakened the economy and led to the non-performance of debtors’ obligations because their business did not run smoothly during the period. Several business actors with homologated PKPU peace were hindered or prevented from achieving their aims including the force majeure qualifications associated with the Covid-19 pandemic. Therefore, this normative legal research conducted through statutory, conceptual, and case approaches was used to assess this situation. The findings showed that a debtor can request to restructure the homologation implementation based on the force majeure of the Covid-19 pandemic but the request needs to be based on the agreement between the debtor and creditor using Article 1338 paragraph (1) of the Civil Code as the premise. It was discovered from the PT Berlian Tenker case that the agreement was conducted without requiring further re-homologation in the court because the UUK-PKPU is not applicable in the matter due to the fact that the Covid-19 pandemic is a national disaster classified as a relative force majeure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Freedom of Speech Without a Direction: Criticism of Promotion of Freedom of Speech in Indonesia Restorative Justice for Settlement of Minor Maltreatment in the Legal Area of the Merangin Police, Jambi Province The Ambiguity of Using the Statement of Absolute Responsibility Based on Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 109 of 2019: Study in Dharmasraya Regency, West Sumatra Province, Indonesia Sharia Banking Disputes Settlement: Analysis of Religious Court Decisions in Indonesia The Solving Indonesian Intellectual Property Rights Transfer Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1