安全的工具和方法:激发哲学思考的技能

I. Kavathatzopoulos, Ryoko Asai, Mikael Laaksoharju
{"title":"安全的工具和方法:激发哲学思考的技能","authors":"I. Kavathatzopoulos, Ryoko Asai, Mikael Laaksoharju","doi":"10.1109/EISIC.2013.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Finding optimal solutions to security issues is very difficult or impossible. Conflicting interests and values decide what has to be done. Every thinkable answer contains both risks and possibilities. I our effort to find solutions we have always to negotiate and make compromises. A dialectic process is necessary in security in order to identify significant interests and values, and to formulate principles and policies. Handling security issues and working for secure IT systems demand continuous adjustment to relevant values as well as the necessary personal skills and suitable group processes. Focusing on the method and making sure that the right way of proceeding has been adopted is the way to get satisfactory answers to the problems of IT security. The philosophical method of deliberative thinking seems to be the basis of such methods.","PeriodicalId":229195,"journal":{"name":"2013 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference","volume":"46 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tools and Methods for Security: Stimulating the Skill to Philosophize\",\"authors\":\"I. Kavathatzopoulos, Ryoko Asai, Mikael Laaksoharju\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EISIC.2013.36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Finding optimal solutions to security issues is very difficult or impossible. Conflicting interests and values decide what has to be done. Every thinkable answer contains both risks and possibilities. I our effort to find solutions we have always to negotiate and make compromises. A dialectic process is necessary in security in order to identify significant interests and values, and to formulate principles and policies. Handling security issues and working for secure IT systems demand continuous adjustment to relevant values as well as the necessary personal skills and suitable group processes. Focusing on the method and making sure that the right way of proceeding has been adopted is the way to get satisfactory answers to the problems of IT security. The philosophical method of deliberative thinking seems to be the basis of such methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":229195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference\",\"volume\":\"46 10\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EISIC.2013.36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EISIC.2013.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

找到安全问题的最佳解决方案非常困难,甚至是不可能的。相互冲突的利益和价值观决定了该做什么。每个可以想到的答案都包含风险和可能性。在我们努力寻找解决办法的过程中,我们总是要进行谈判并作出妥协。安全需要辩证的过程,以确定重大利益和价值,并制定原则和政策。处理安全问题和为安全的IT系统工作需要不断调整相关的价值观,以及必要的个人技能和合适的团队流程。关注方法,确保采用正确的处理方式,是对IT安全问题得到满意答案的方法。深思熟虑的哲学方法似乎是这些方法的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tools and Methods for Security: Stimulating the Skill to Philosophize
Finding optimal solutions to security issues is very difficult or impossible. Conflicting interests and values decide what has to be done. Every thinkable answer contains both risks and possibilities. I our effort to find solutions we have always to negotiate and make compromises. A dialectic process is necessary in security in order to identify significant interests and values, and to formulate principles and policies. Handling security issues and working for secure IT systems demand continuous adjustment to relevant values as well as the necessary personal skills and suitable group processes. Focusing on the method and making sure that the right way of proceeding has been adopted is the way to get satisfactory answers to the problems of IT security. The philosophical method of deliberative thinking seems to be the basis of such methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Tool for Visualizing and Analyzing Users on Discussion Boards Cross Domain Assessment of Document to HTML Conversion Tools to Quantify Text and Structural Loss during Document Analysis The CriLiM Methodology: Crime Linkage with a Fuzzy MCDM Approach Radiated Emission from Handheld Devices with Touch-Screen LCDs A Pilot Study of Using Honeypots as Cyber Intelligence Sources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1