ACM和IEEE成员对计算机领域专业精神的看法分析

ACM-SE 20 Pub Date : 1982-04-01 DOI:10.1145/503896.503937
J. D. Longhill
{"title":"ACM和IEEE成员对计算机领域专业精神的看法分析","authors":"J. D. Longhill","doi":"10.1145/503896.503937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As computers become more of an indispensable part of everyday life, there is a growing feeling that those who design, program, build, and manage these machines should be professionals, in the same sense that lawyers, doctors, accountants and architects are professional. One criterion (perhaps the most important) of a true profession is that it be represented by a strong professional society. One reason perhaps why the computer field has not developed to the status of a true profession is that it does not as yet have this prerequisite professional society. The ACM and IEEE are the two largest of the many associations in the computer field that purport to be professional societies. Information from the members of these two organizations concerning their views on professionalism in the computer field should be useful in determining why there is still not the strong professional computer society that is needed. This paper presents preliminary data drawn from an ongoing study of the opinions of ACM and IEEE members concerning aspects of professionalism in the computer field.","PeriodicalId":184493,"journal":{"name":"ACM-SE 20","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of views of ACM and IEEE members concerning professionalism in the computing field\",\"authors\":\"J. D. Longhill\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/503896.503937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As computers become more of an indispensable part of everyday life, there is a growing feeling that those who design, program, build, and manage these machines should be professionals, in the same sense that lawyers, doctors, accountants and architects are professional. One criterion (perhaps the most important) of a true profession is that it be represented by a strong professional society. One reason perhaps why the computer field has not developed to the status of a true profession is that it does not as yet have this prerequisite professional society. The ACM and IEEE are the two largest of the many associations in the computer field that purport to be professional societies. Information from the members of these two organizations concerning their views on professionalism in the computer field should be useful in determining why there is still not the strong professional computer society that is needed. This paper presents preliminary data drawn from an ongoing study of the opinions of ACM and IEEE members concerning aspects of professionalism in the computer field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM-SE 20\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1982-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM-SE 20\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/503896.503937\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM-SE 20","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/503896.503937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着计算机越来越成为日常生活中不可或缺的一部分,人们越来越觉得那些设计、编程、制造和管理这些机器的人应该是专业人士,就像律师、医生、会计师和建筑师是专业人士一样。一个真正的职业的一个标准(也许是最重要的)是它被一个强大的专业团体所代表。计算机领域还没有发展到一个真正的职业地位的一个原因可能是它还没有这个先决条件的专业协会。ACM和IEEE是计算机领域自称为专业协会的众多协会中最大的两个。这两个组织的成员提供的关于他们对计算机领域专业主义的看法的信息,应该有助于确定为什么仍然没有需要的强大的专业计算机协会。本文介绍了一项正在进行的关于ACM和IEEE成员在计算机领域的专业性方面的意见的研究得出的初步数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of views of ACM and IEEE members concerning professionalism in the computing field
As computers become more of an indispensable part of everyday life, there is a growing feeling that those who design, program, build, and manage these machines should be professionals, in the same sense that lawyers, doctors, accountants and architects are professional. One criterion (perhaps the most important) of a true profession is that it be represented by a strong professional society. One reason perhaps why the computer field has not developed to the status of a true profession is that it does not as yet have this prerequisite professional society. The ACM and IEEE are the two largest of the many associations in the computer field that purport to be professional societies. Information from the members of these two organizations concerning their views on professionalism in the computer field should be useful in determining why there is still not the strong professional computer society that is needed. This paper presents preliminary data drawn from an ongoing study of the opinions of ACM and IEEE members concerning aspects of professionalism in the computer field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EPA - HERL/RTP: a DBMS application using word processing Computer graphics animation of the Tellico Reservoir water temperature simulation Realization of a translator for Janus Synthesizing abstract data type specifications An alternate approach to formal parsing methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1