软件开发生命周期中的可访问性:系统的文献综述

Mauricio Cruz-Portilla, J. C. Pérez-Arriaga, Jorge Octavio Ocharán-Hernández, Á. Sánchez-García
{"title":"软件开发生命周期中的可访问性:系统的文献综述","authors":"Mauricio Cruz-Portilla, J. C. Pérez-Arriaga, Jorge Octavio Ocharán-Hernández, Á. Sánchez-García","doi":"10.1109/CONISOFT52520.2021.00024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accessibility is an issue that has not been given due importance, since software products developed that lack it continue to be observed. Software developers are not considering the accessibility in the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC), giving a sense that there is not enough information about this topic. This paper presents a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with 40 primary studies comprehended between 2015 and 2021, which addressed accessibility in any of the four main phases of the SDLC: requirements, design, construction, and testing. The results indicated that the design phase is the most considered when discussing accessibility, followed by the requirements and testing phases, leaving the construction phase as the least addressed. This SLR has the purpose of aiming software engineers with the most updated view of activities and artifacts used to address accessibility in the SDLC, including techniques to verify it in a software product.","PeriodicalId":380632,"journal":{"name":"2021 9th International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation (CONISOFT)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accessibility in the Software Development Life Cycle: A Systematic Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"Mauricio Cruz-Portilla, J. C. Pérez-Arriaga, Jorge Octavio Ocharán-Hernández, Á. Sánchez-García\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CONISOFT52520.2021.00024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accessibility is an issue that has not been given due importance, since software products developed that lack it continue to be observed. Software developers are not considering the accessibility in the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC), giving a sense that there is not enough information about this topic. This paper presents a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with 40 primary studies comprehended between 2015 and 2021, which addressed accessibility in any of the four main phases of the SDLC: requirements, design, construction, and testing. The results indicated that the design phase is the most considered when discussing accessibility, followed by the requirements and testing phases, leaving the construction phase as the least addressed. This SLR has the purpose of aiming software engineers with the most updated view of activities and artifacts used to address accessibility in the SDLC, including techniques to verify it in a software product.\",\"PeriodicalId\":380632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 9th International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation (CONISOFT)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 9th International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation (CONISOFT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CONISOFT52520.2021.00024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 9th International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation (CONISOFT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CONISOFT52520.2021.00024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可访问性是一个没有得到应有重视的问题,因为开发的软件产品缺乏可访问性。软件开发人员没有考虑软件开发生命周期(SDLC)中的可访问性,给人一种关于这个主题的信息不够的感觉。本文对2015年至2021年间的40项主要研究进行了系统文献综述(SLR),这些研究涉及SDLC的四个主要阶段中的任何一个阶段:需求、设计、构建和测试。结果表明,在讨论可访问性时,设计阶段是考虑最多的,其次是需求和测试阶段,而构造阶段是最少的。该SLR的目的是为软件工程师提供活动和工件的最新视图,用于处理SDLC中的可访问性,包括在软件产品中验证它的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accessibility in the Software Development Life Cycle: A Systematic Literature Review
Accessibility is an issue that has not been given due importance, since software products developed that lack it continue to be observed. Software developers are not considering the accessibility in the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC), giving a sense that there is not enough information about this topic. This paper presents a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with 40 primary studies comprehended between 2015 and 2021, which addressed accessibility in any of the four main phases of the SDLC: requirements, design, construction, and testing. The results indicated that the design phase is the most considered when discussing accessibility, followed by the requirements and testing phases, leaving the construction phase as the least addressed. This SLR has the purpose of aiming software engineers with the most updated view of activities and artifacts used to address accessibility in the SDLC, including techniques to verify it in a software product.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Scrumlity: An Agile Framework Based on Quality Assurance Information Visualization In Adaptable Dashboards For Smart Cities: A Systematic Review Microservices Deployment: A Systematic Mapping Study Automatic Grading of Programming Assignments in Moodle Software Design and Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Mapping Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1